Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 03:23 ---
Hey Everyone,
I have
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote:
Thomas Emmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and this message means that the CVS-server is full.
I think this was mentioned before two days ago.
Some days before I had the problem that the download hangs in
xc/xc/util/patch infinitely. Now I
Larry McVoy wrote:
From: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sourceforge CVS, was Re: [Dri-devel] radeon error
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:
Having used CVS and BitKeeper, BitKeeper is way better.
I will just add a big Amen, Brother! to that.
Thomas Emmel wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote:
Thomas Emmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and this message means that the CVS-server is full.
I think this was mentioned before two days ago.
Some days before I had the problem that the download hangs in
xc/xc/util/patch
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Thomas Emmel wrote:
Thanks a lot for your help. I have already loaded it via rsync from
jose's mirror. Approx. 10 times faster than CVS...
rsync from jose has made it at least _possible_ to follow DRI development.
However... It's really a sucky thing to use. It means
Back to my problem...
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:24, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Is it correct that your application is using 1-dimensional textures and vertex
arrays? This is a little-exercised aspect of the driver, but it shouldn't too
hard to fix up. I'll try and rig up something here that
Hello
I'm not sure that you will be too interested in this problem, but here goes...
I am running xfree86 4.3.0 with the ATI 128 drivers from 2nd Sept. I am trying to run
Medal of Honor Allied Assault with the Spearhead expansion pack under the August wine
drop. If I disable hardware opengl
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:53, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 16:42, Mike A. Harris wrote:
dri.freedesktop.org sound good?
I love the idea of moving to freedesktop.org right now to deal with the
anonymous cvs issue, provide cvsup, and probably a more responsive set
of admins.
Hi,
I'm not sure freedesktop.org can host anoncvs, though it's possible we
could for DRI. I know GNOME, KDE, Mozilla, and other huge projects'
anoncvs would require more load than freedesktop.org server can
handle. DRI anoncvs traffic may be smaller.
However, we do plan to have anoncvs mirrors
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
-- Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
I know bk is the best version control system in the universe
feature-wise, no need to say it again. And again. And again. (And
Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
I'm running a quite up-to-date mirror in Germany - currently without public
access, but we could change this. Though this mirror suffers from absence of
the SF server too
What sort of a mirror, Martin?
I did a daily CVS
Thomas Emmel wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:12, Thomas Emmel wrote:
Back to my problem...
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:24, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Is it correct that your application is using 1-dimensional textures and vertex
arrays? This is a little-exercised aspect of the driver, but it
Thomas Emmel wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:12, Thomas Emmel wrote:
Back to my problem...
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:24, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Is it correct that your application is using 1-dimensional textures and vertex
arrays? This is a little-exercised aspect of the driver, but it
dri.freedesktop.org sound good?
I love the idea of moving to freedesktop.org right now to deal with the
anonymous cvs issue, provide cvsup, and probably a more responsive set
of admins. Is there consensus on this?
I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
I'm with
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:57:30PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable,
anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't even
think about using non-anon pserver but I don't think DRI will ever need
such a
Thomas Emmel wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Hmm, after looking at your screenshots, this seems like a seperate, unrelated
problem.
What happens if you set the following environment variables:
R200_NO_VTXFMT=t
R200_NO_TCL=t
Keith
R200_NO_VTXFMT=t
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:06:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:57:30PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable,
anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't
On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 11:15, Michel Dnzer wrote:
I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
If need be I think linux.org.uk can field a secondary rsync'd
anonymous CVS. It might need the 80Gb disks to be upped to 160/240Gb
but that needs to happen soon anyway
I did not meant to replace everything via rsync. I use it for
several purposes, mostly backup and it is a great tool but not
really able to handle a repository. The point is only the speed
Ditto. I use rsync for all the big pulls and sync ups. Since I rsync
from a CVS checkout all the cvs
Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2003 15:11 schrieb Thomas Emmel:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Hmm, after looking at your screenshots, this seems like a seperate,
unrelated problem.
What happens if you set the following environment variables:
R200_NO_VTXFMT=t
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 15:31, Dieter Nützel wrote:
I can second that.
Have you tried demos/stex3d e.g. move the window to the right side of your
desktop?
Yes I have now and it looks really similar. The ring is broken on
several positions. But the object I see in my application is
always
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 19:42, Jon Smirl wrote:
There are 31 people with write access to dri.sf.net. The simplest solution
would be for those 31 to switch to BitKeeper.
If thos 31 are OK with that then it's easy, we can do a BK to CVS
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
-- Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
I know bk is the best version control system in the universe
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:11, Larry McVoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
-- Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
I know
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Hello. In the future, please try to include line-breaks in your
messages. It makes them *much* easier to read. Thanks. :)
I am running xfree86 4.3.0 with the ATI 128 drivers from 2nd Sept. I am trying to run Medal of Honor Allied Assault with the Spearhead
Larry McVoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
-- Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
I know bk is the best version control system in the
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:21:04PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:11, Larry McVoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
-- Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:29:12PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
I'm not sure that anyone is asking you to use it. What's wrong with the
people who want to use BK use BK and the people who want to use CVS use
CVS?
Primarily the difficulty of creating an automated two-way bridge between
Larry McVoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 19:42, Jon Smirl wrote:
There are 31 people with write access to dri.sf.net. The simplest solution
would be for those 31 to switch to BitKeeper.
If thos 31 are OK with that
Ian Romanick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Hello. In the future, please try to include line-breaks in your
messages. It makes them *much* easier to read. Thanks. :)
I am running xfree86 4.3.0 with the ATI 128 drivers from 2nd Sept. I
am trying to run Medal of Honor Allied Assault
Larry McVoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:29:12PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
I'm not sure that anyone is asking you to use it. What's wrong with the
people who want to use BK use BK and the people who want to use CVS use
CVS?
Primarily the difficulty of creating an automated two-way
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Who is building the binary snapshots these days? We need to start
(and should have started a long time ago) including libGL.so in the
snapshots.
Hmm, we've tried to ensure up until now that the drivers would work with
existing libGL.so's. What has
Ian Romanick wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Who is building the binary snapshots these days? We need to start
(and should have started a long time ago) including libGL.so in the
snapshots.
Hmm, we've tried to ensure up until now that the drivers would work
with existing
Larry McVoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People claim that our license is a problem but the only real problem is
the people making the noise. [...]
Things are getting ridiculous when you start to superimpose your attitude
towards ethics on others - especially when you are obviously lacking the
Can we please end this discussion about the BK license now? Or at least
take it off list?
As for BitKeeper vs CVS (for the DRI), this is what it breaks down to:
1) The BK license possibly forbids at least one DRI developer from using
the free version of BK.
2) Other DRI developers have moral
Over the years, the core linux team has changes from fanatical hobbyists
to a coding production team with deadlines. A fair chunk of the team
seem to be from redhat who has a finacial interest in linux.
Because of this the core of the linux team appear to be more concerned
about getting the job
Over the years, the core linux team has changes from fanatical hobbyists
to a coding production team with deadlines. A fair chunk of the team
seem to be from redhat who has a finacial interest in linux.
Because of this the core of the linux team appear to be more concerned
about getting the job
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
Since I rsync from a CVS checkout all the cvs commands still work but go
back off to the CVS server saving a ton of bandwidth and cpu
This only works if the CVS server itself is working well _anyway_.
So yes, rsync in that sense can be used to (somewhat
Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2003 18:00 schrieb Matt Sealey:
Nothing whatsoever. But IMHO there's something wrong with people who
keep trying to shove non-free tools down everyone else's throats.
The problem with that statement is that it implies that you speak for
everyone, in particular
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Chris Ison wrote:
Because of this the core of the linux team appear to be more concerned
about getting the job done due to the fact that some big money is
supporting and using linux. Although linux is FREE, its pholisiphy has
changed from one of Screw you Billy Goat, I'm
--- Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we please end this discussion about the BK license now? Or at least
take it off list?
As for BitKeeper vs CVS (for the DRI), this is what it breaks down to:
1) The BK license possibly forbids at least one DRI developer from using
the
What exactly is the problem with Sourceforge anonymous CVS
anyway? I heard that the problems were a temporary measure
before they got new hardware to reduce the strain, but I
never saw any updates or new news about it after that.
One thing I was thinking. Couldn't a developer with CVS SSH
Matt Sealey wrote:
What exactly is the problem with Sourceforge anonymous CVS
anyway? I heard that the problems were a temporary measure
before they got new hardware to reduce the strain, but I
never saw any updates or new news about it after that.
From the 8/29 SourceForge newsletter:
[...]
I
--- Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Primarily the difficulty of creating an automated two-way bridge between
them.
As I understood it, the BK-CVS gateway you've talked about is a one-way
affair, right?
Larry has offered to import DRI CVS into BK and then setup a BK to CVS bridge
On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 20:02, Brian Paul wrote:
With any luck, the CVS performance problems will soon be mitigated.
and the disk space
and the response time ?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:14:48PM -0700, Jon Smirl wrote:
Larry has offered to import DRI CVS into BK and then setup a BK to CVS bridge
at bkbits.net. This would mean that CVS is served from bkbits.net. He asks that
everyone give it a try and not just ignore it if he is going to go through the
Am Donnerstag, 4. September 2003 05:27 schrieb Chris Ison:
Over the years, the core linux team has changes from fanatical hobbyists
to a coding production team with deadlines. A fair chunk of the team
seem to be from redhat who has a finacial interest in linux.
Do not exaggerate.
ODSL, Europe
On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 11:15, Michel D=C3=A4nzer wrote:
I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
If need be I think linux.org.uk can field a secondary rsync'd=20
anonymous CVS. It might need the 80Gb disks to be upped to 160/240Gb
but that needs to happen soon anyway
Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2003 20:35 schrieb Matt Sealey:
--
Matt Sealey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dieter Nützel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 September 2003 18:45
To: Matt Sealey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [OT] Sourceforge CVS
Am
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
Isn't there some sort of delay involved here? I remember seeing something
about the kernel BK-CVS lagging by several days. If so moving to BK could
make the problem worse...
The main delay we've seen is when the central BK places have gone down due
Well, earlier today (after about 5 days of absolutely *no* luck with the
sourceforge CVS servers), I managed to pull the entire source tree for the
Syllable operating system.
When I tried to pull the DRI CVS, though, I kept hitting locked files...
I made three attempts, over the period of about
Chris Ison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DRI is still quite young and alot of people still have the Screw you
Billy Goat attitude, [...]
Please remember that DRI is not Linux,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Keith Packard wrote:
Around 9 o'clock on Sep 3, Keith Whitwell wrote:
It seems like anon cvs is something that causes project-hosting sites some
discomfort... freedesktop.org doesn't have it in place right now, for instance.
Freedesktop doesn't have any real CVS running at the moment; we
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably better asked on dri-devel (cc:ed).
--- Cheshire Cat Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am investigating supporting DRI and OpenGL for the Silicon Motion
driver.
I'm new to both of those, so some
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 19:28 ---
Created an attachment
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 19:33 ---
Created an attachment
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 19:54, Jon Smirl wrote:
I also wish Michel D would give BK a try before dismissing it on religious
grounds.
My motivations aren't religious, in fact they're very pragmatic, and
anyone who thinks he knows my motivations better than I do is sadly
mistaken.
--
Earthling
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:40, Larry McVoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:21:04PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:11, Larry McVoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
-- Michel
I don't speak for anyone but myself.
Which part of 'CVS isn't the problem' is so hard for you guys to
understand?
Message received, I've unsubscribed from the list and won't bother you again.
If you change your mind and decide we can help, let us know, happy to do so.
If not, no worries,
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:46, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Thomas Emmel wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote:
Thomas Emmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and this message means that the CVS-server is full.
I think this was mentioned before two days ago.
Some days before I had the
--- Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 18:27, Mike Mestnik wrote:
--- Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 18:43, Mike Mestnik wrote:
I have something to add to this. Recently I tested gatos drivers going
from dri to gatos was
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Eric Anholt wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt:
My current diff is at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff
It's against DRI CVS.
This is probably better asked on dri-devel (cc:ed).
--- Cheshire Cat Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am investigating supporting DRI and OpenGL for the Silicon Motion
driver.
I'm new to both of those, so some of these may be newbie sounding
questions.
1) I have the OpenGL code from the
64 matches
Mail list logo
