Re: [Dri-devel] driver comparison

2003-10-17 Thread Keith Whitwell
Roland Scheidegger wrote: Keith Whitwell wrote: And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why the dri driver is quite a bit slower (up to 50% in some subtests) in SpecViewPerf compared to the cvs version of july? Could this be related to the changes with

Re: [Dri-devel] weird corruption with r200

2003-10-17 Thread Keith Whitwell
Alex Deucher wrote: Before I go grepping through the tree, where would I find this code (in the DRM, DRI, or 2D)? Also is it for r100 or r200 or both? is there a r200_cp_dispatch_clear()? It's in the drm module. The r200 shares the radeon kernel code. Keith

[Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-10-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 04:41, Alex Deucher wrote: Log message: *Re-wrote MergedFB validate mode function from scratch based on crt1 validation rather than the old clone validation code. So does it work more or less like the old clone mode by default now? :) *Fixed mode validation on

[Dri-devel] compilation failure in sis_alloc.c

2003-10-17 Thread Keith Whitwell
Anyone seeing this? I'm pretty sure this isn't just something local to my environment. I'll probably take 'sis' out of the build in the meantime. Keith gcc -c -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-10-17 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Michel D�nzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 04:41, Alex Deucher wrote: Log message: *Re-wrote MergedFB validate mode function from scratch based on crt1 validation rather than the old clone validation code. So does it work more or less like the old clone

[Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-10-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 05:14, Eric Anholt wrote: Log message: - Converted Linux drivers to initialize DRM instances based on PCI IDs, not just a single instance. Moved the PCI ID lists from card_drv.c in BSD to card.h. The PCI ID lists include a driver private field, which may be used

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-10-17 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 04:41, Alex Deucher wrote: Log message: *Re-wrote MergedFB validate mode function from scratch based on crt1 validation rather than the old clone validation code. So does it work more or less like the old

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-10-17 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Michel D�nzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 05:14, Eric Anholt wrote: Log message: - Converted Linux drivers to initialize DRM instances based on PCI IDs, not just a single instance. Moved the PCI ID lists from card_drv.c in BSD to card.h. The PCI ID

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-10-17 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 17:41, Alex Deucher wrote: --- Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The case I was concerned about was multiple Radeon cards, that used to fail rather spectacularly. I thought that had something to do with rom loading on secondary cards, although you may be

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI + Radeon + LCD has framerate cap

2003-10-17 Thread Alex Deucher
you need to change the DRI config settings: http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ConfigurationInfrastructure perhaps we shouldn't make sync to refresh the default. Alex --- Paul Zaremba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have a Radeon 8500 LE with an LCD attached to the CRT output.

Re: [Dri-devel] driver comparison, cp vs rm; cp.

2003-10-17 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:36, Roland Scheidegger wrote: Keith Whitwell wrote: Alex Deucher wrote: As I recall KDE preloads libGL for some reason. that might have something to do with it. If you make sure that the old driver.so file

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI + Radeon + LCD has framerate cap

2003-10-17 Thread Paul Zaremba
On Friday 17 October 2003 03:10 pm, Alex Deucher wrote: you need to change the DRI config settings: http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ConfigurationInfrastructure perhaps we shouldn't make sync to refresh the default. Alex Thank you Alex, I'll download driconf and give it a shot.

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI + Radeon + LCD has framerate cap

2003-10-17 Thread Felix Kühling
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you need to change the DRI config settings: http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ConfigurationInfrastructure perhaps we shouldn't make sync to refresh the default. IIRC there was a similar discussion

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI + Radeon + LCD has framerate cap

2003-10-17 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you need to change the DRI config settings: http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ConfigurationInfrastructure perhaps we shouldn't make sync to refresh

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI + Radeon + LCD has framerate cap

2003-10-17 Thread Alex Deucher
plus there is a certain machismo element to the number of FPS your card can render... --- Mike Mestnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you need to change the DRI config

[Dri-devel] new 2048 limit code...

2003-10-17 Thread Alex Deucher
I've had several mergedfb users complain about the 2048 DRI limit put in yesterday: else if ( pScrn-virtualX 2048 || pScrn-virtualY 2048 ) { info-directRenderingEnabled = FALSE; xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_WARNING, Direct

[Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-10-17 Thread Keith Whitwell
Felix Kuehling wrote: CVSROOT:/cvs/dri Module name:xc Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/sis/ Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/10/17 06:26:08 Log message: Fixed linking of DRI drivers with common object files. Now each driver only links with those common objects

Re: [Dri-devel] new 2048 limit code...

2003-10-17 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 17:27, Alex Deucher wrote: I've had several mergedfb users complain about the 2048 DRI limit put in yesterday: else if ( pScrn-virtualX 2048 || pScrn-virtualY 2048 ) { info-directRenderingEnabled = FALSE; xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex,

Re: [Dri-devel] driver comparison, cp vs rm; cp.

2003-10-17 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:36, Roland Scheidegger wrote: Keith Whitwell wrote: Well, I've never tried to install the whole XFree86 when it's running, but I'm often lazy and just compile the mesa/src/drv/r200 if only small changes happen and copy

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-17-10 22:37 --- I've been having a