[Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?

2003-10-30 Thread Ronny V. Vindenes
Something in the last week or two broke the r200 driver. After I cvs update'ed and recompiled yesterday, I get this error: (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020 (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting engine... (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP reset -1020 (EE)

Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?

2003-10-30 Thread Keith Whitwell
Ronny V. Vindenes wrote: Something in the last week or two broke the r200 driver. After I cvs update'ed and recompiled yesterday, I get this error: (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020 (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting engine... (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP

Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?

2003-10-30 Thread Ronny V. Vindenes
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 12:03, Keith Whitwell wrote: Ronny V. Vindenes wrote: Something in the last week or two broke the r200 driver. After I cvs update'ed and recompiled yesterday, I get this error: (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020 (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed

Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?

2003-10-30 Thread Stefan Lange
Ronny V. Vindenes wrote: Something in the last week or two broke the r200 driver. After I cvs update'ed and recompiled yesterday, I get this error: [...] Card is 9000/128mb under linux 2.6.0-test9 (athlon64 running in pure 32bit mode) with an lcd connected to dvi. just wanted to let you know that

[Dri-devel] Re: new 2048 limit code...

2003-10-30 Thread Alex Deucher
Hopefully I'll have some time this weekend to look into this, what files in the r200 client driver should I be looking at? Having looked at the code I'm guessing r200_state. Scissor and cliprect stuff. Although thinking about it more, there are probably more changes required since I guess

Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?

2003-10-30 Thread Chris Ison
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 20:43, Ronny V. Vindenes wrote: Card is 9000/128mb under linux 2.6.0-test9 (athlon64 running in pure 32bit mode) with an lcd connected to dvi. Just checked latest DRI CVS with my radeon 9000 PCI, no errors. I know it doesn't help but it might give you a better idea of

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI sw only mode

2003-10-30 Thread Chris Ison
ok, should of mentioned, its with the r200 driver, and confirmed again with the the cvs as of 30 mins ago. glXSwapBuffers segs GL applications if DRI is NOT enabled. Confirmed by recompiling glxgears with debugging and ran through gdb (see previous emails)

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI sw only mode

2003-10-30 Thread Felix Kühling
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:42:34 +1000 Chris Ison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, should of mentioned, its with the r200 driver, and confirmed again with the the cvs as of 30 mins ago. glXSwapBuffers segs GL applications if DRI is NOT enabled. Confirmed by recompiling glxgears with debugging and

[Dri-devel] [Bug 704] Display freeze with Java3D and Radeon 9000

2003-10-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-10 18:08 --- No. Sorry, I don't

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI sw only mode

2003-10-30 Thread Chris Ison
Hmm, I can't reproduce this with my Radeon7500 and DRI disabled by not loading module dri in XF86Config-4. Seeing a backtrace after the segfault would be extremely helpful in locating the exact problem. Just type bt at the gdb prompt after the segfault. Regards, Felix bt just returns

Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?

2003-10-30 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Ronny V. Vindenes wrote: Something in the last week or two broke the r200 driver. After I cvs update'ed and recompiled yesterday, I get this error: (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020 (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting engine... (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI sw only mode

2003-10-30 Thread Ian Romanick
Chris Ison wrote: On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 17:08, Chris Ison wrote: I'm wondering what happened to the full sw mode for 3d you could use before when DRI wasn't enabled. Now GL apps just seg (including glxgears) where a few months ago you could still run them without DRI although very slow. Further

Re: [Dri-devel] r200 in cvs broken?

2003-10-30 Thread Ronny V. Vindenes
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 00:43, Roland Scheidegger wrote: Ronny V. Vindenes wrote: Something in the last week or two broke the r200 driver. After I cvs update'ed and recompiled yesterday, I get this error: (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020 (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer

[Dri-devel] Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alex Deucher
I'll take a look at fixing this in the radeon driver. What needs to be done to play nice with the DRI? Alex --- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:47:06AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote: Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Well, if someone else has a chip, or

[Dri-devel] Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alan Hourihane
I've actually already done it, but I'll probably leave it till after XFree86 4.4.0. Once 4.4.0 is out, I'll merge that into the DRI CVS and create a branch for this work I've been doing on the radeon with regard to dynamic allocation the DRI. Alan. On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:36:42AM -0800,

[Dri-devel] Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:59:41AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote: Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I've actually already done it, but I'll probably leave it till after XFree86 4.4.0. Regarding bug 830, does this mean my users can expect to sometimes hit these situations where XVIDEO

[Dri-devel] Re: [XFree86] DRI weirdnesses for RADEON 9200

2003-10-30 Thread Ian Romanick
manu wrote: Hi all, before I open a bug for that I would like to sort out things a bit. Here is the story : I installed a MDK 9.2, the agpgart module seems to be OK with my mobo (which has a nForce2 Ultra chipset), so I went on and try to make 3D accel work for my Radeon 9200. Whereas all

[Dri-devel] Re: [XFree86] Re: DRI weirdnesses for RADEON 9200

2003-10-30 Thread Ian Romanick
manu wrote: Le 30.10.2003 17:07:54, manu a écrit : So I ran glxinfo see below which told me that Direct Rendering is not enabled! This is crazy as you can check in the XFree log (file attached). Hope someone can tell me more about this, be it to file this directly as a bug on bugzilla ;-)

[Dri-devel] Re: Linear Allocator (Was Re: Alan H's new linear allocator and Neomagic Xv)

2003-10-30 Thread Billy Biggs
Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I've actually already done it, but I'll probably leave it till after XFree86 4.4.0. Regarding bug 830, does this mean my users can expect to sometimes hit these situations where XVIDEO apps can't run until they shut down a large application like their web