[Dri-devel] soft locks with radeon 9100

2004-01-01 Thread MichaelM
I tried installing the new ati binary drivers, and every game, except Enemy Territory hard locks on start-up. I can, however, alt-ctrl-backspace back to the console, so it's not the end of the world. I initially though it was an issue with the ati drivers, but when I reverted to the DRI

Re: [Dri-devel] soft locks with radeon 9100

2004-01-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 20:07, MichaelM wrote: I tried installing the new ati binary drivers, and every game, except Enemy Territory hard locks on start-up. I can, however, alt-ctrl-backspace back to the console, so it's not the end of the world. Nor is it a hard lock. :) Can you also log in

Re: [Dri-devel] soft locks with radeon 9100

2004-01-01 Thread MichaelM
On Thursday 01 January 2004 08:41, Michel Dnzer wrote: Nor is it a hard lock. :) Can you also log in remotely and kill the game? What about glxgears, does it also lock up? Can you close the window? ... I haven't tried to log in remotely, but I can alt-ctrl-f2 to a console and kill the

Re: [Dri-devel] soft locks with radeon 9100

2004-01-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 21:21, MichaelM wrote: On Thursday 01 January 2004 08:41, Michel Dnzer wrote: Nor is it a hard lock. :) Can you also log in remotely and kill the game? What about glxgears, does it also lock up? Can you close the window? ... I haven't tried to log in remotely, but I

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 19:21, Jon Smirl wrote: The headers for nopageXX calls just changed. struct page * (*nopage)(struct vm_area_struct * area, unsigned long address, int unused); changed to: struct page * (*nopage)(struct vm_area_struct * area, unsigned long address, int *type); The

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 13:03, Michel Dnzer wrote: How does this patch look? ugly. I find using #defines for function arguments ugly beyond belief and makes it really hard to look through code. I 10x rather have an ifdef in the function prototype (which then for the mainstream kernel drm can be

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 13:10, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 13:03, Michel Dnzer wrote: How does this patch look? ugly. I find using #defines for function arguments ugly beyond belief and makes it really hard to look through code. I 10x rather have an ifdef in the

Re: [Dri-devel] soft locks with radeon 9100

2004-01-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
Following up to the list as Michael's ISP doesn't seem to accept mail from me, without giving a reason... On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 22:49, MichaelM wrote: Thanks. I don't see any obvious problems; does setting the R200_NO_IRQS environment variable make a difference? Nup, that made no

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 01:03:38PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: No, this is Linux specific. How does this patch look? Okay, you did something weird with nopage args, but I thought I did the equivalent of this in the original patch? -- wli

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 01:23:40PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: How does this patch look? ugly. I find using #defines for function arguments ugly beyond belief and makes it really hard to look through code. I 10x rather have an ifdef in the function prototype (which then for the

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 14:33, William Lee Irwin III wrote: On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 01:03:38PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: No, this is Linux specific. How does this patch look? Okay, you did something weird with nopage args, but I thought I did the equivalent of this in the original patch?

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 14:33, William Lee Irwin III wrote: Okay, you did something weird with nopage args, but I thought I did the equivalent of this in the original patch? On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:50:30PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: This is about the canonical DRM code in the DRI tree. I'm

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 13:28, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 01:23:40PM +0100, Michel Dnzer wrote: I find using #defines for function arguments ugly beyond belief and makes it really hard to look through code. I 10x rather have an ifdef in the function prototype

Re: [Dri-devel] Status update - VIA CLE266

2004-01-01 Thread Felix Kühling
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 02:01:27 + Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I played tuxracer using XFree 4.3.0 and my test code last might. Depth buffering in some cases is shot, there is a lot of fallback stuff occuring for clipped polygons that isnt working and things are a peculiar brown colour

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 03:27:59PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: Does this look better? Maybe a macro (or a typedef?) for the type of the last argument would still be a good idea? Or is there yet a better way? I'm going to regret suggesting this, but how about: (a) a typedef for the arg itself

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread Alan Cox
On Iau, 2004-01-01 at 13:50, Michel Dnzer wrote: Okay, you did something weird with nopage args, but I thought I did the equivalent of this in the original patch? This is about the canonical DRM code in the DRI tree. 99.9% of people run the DRM code in the kernel tree, so definitions of

[Dri-devel] [Bug 1038] DRI doesn't work on 1st gen iMac (mach64)

2004-01-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1038 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Michel Dänzer wrote: well the advantage is that the ifdefs can just go away in kernel trees of specific versions... (eg unifdef it) Does this look better? Maybe a macro (or a typedef?) for the type of the last argument would still be a good idea? Or is there yet a

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread Nigel Cunningham
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 09:19, Linus Torvalds wrote: In contrast, full-file interfaces for different kernel versions are a _lot_ easier to merge and keep track of. They may look like duplication, but the advantages are legion. You don't mix different OS's and different versions together, and

[Dri-devel] [Bug 1038] DRI doesn't work on 1st gen iMac (mach64)

2004-01-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1038 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-01 17:46 --- I think you

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage

2004-01-01 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Nigel Cunningham wrote: Of course there are also advantages to _not_ using the file-per-kernel version scheme. No there isn't. The thing is, you should keep those file-per-OS files as small as possible, and only contain the things that are literally different.

[Dri-devel] CLE266 status update

2004-01-01 Thread Alan Cox
- 3D now works with 2D acceleration enabled - Chromium BSU runs entirely - Window overlapping now works - Tuxracer works except that the initial screen has a pale brown not a pale blue background (any ideas anyone ?) - Most screensavers run - morph3d and pipes crash - Several screensavers (but

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon vtxfmt code path is not working

2004-01-01 Thread Felix Kühling
I managed to get the vtxfmt path enabled and fixed a small problem that didn't show up when vtxfmt wasn't enabled. Flightgear performance increased only marginally since it draws most of its geometry using vertex arrays which is a vtxfmt fallback. I was able improve the situation by not installing

Re: [Dri-devel] CLE266 status update

2004-01-01 Thread Alex Deucher
Does the via driver support 3D with dualhead? It seems to. I noticed the following code in via_context.c: GLboolean saam; int count = 0, fbSize; saam = XineramaIsActive(vmesa-display); if (saam vmesa-viaScreen-drixinerama) { vmesa-xsi =