G33 graphics broken after 2.6.23-rc6

2007-10-06 Thread Matthew Reppert
I've got a new-ish system that I've been trying to get working that's very close; the only things left are networking (which the latest e1000 driver from sf.net might fix) and graphics. The system is a DG33TL micro ATX motherboard with a 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo processor and 2GB RAM. The graphics

Re: Revert intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33

2007-10-06 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote: I guess, this will break my graphics, no? http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/20/447 Can you try it? We do have a rule about no regressions, so I think we'll have to do the revert, but it would be nice to hear what the consequences for the revert is for the

Re: Revert intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33

2007-10-06 Thread Keith Packard
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 08:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: We do have a rule about no regressions, so I think we'll have to do the revert, but it would be nice to hear what the consequences for the revert is for the affected hardware and new X.org.. No regressions is more important than

[Bug 10191] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in viaGetLock()

2007-10-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10191 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 10191] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in viaGetLock()

2007-10-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10191 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://bugs.edge.launchpad.|https://bugs.launchpad.net/b