On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:50:41PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 02:15:41 + (GMT)
Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915:
implement new pm ops for i915), among other
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23993
Juhana Uuttu juhana.uu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
---
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Which is functionally equivalent to my patch, because
i915_suspend/resume() won't be
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23993
--- Comment #6 from Rafał Mużyło galtge...@o2.pl 2010-01-09 06:08:53 PST ---
I think there's some inefficiency in a way r300_dri.so
frees memory, compared to swrast_dri.so.
--
Configure bugmail:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:50:41PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Linus, can we ever drop those old paths? Maybe after the new bits have
been around for awhile? Users of really old userspace stacks would
lose 3D support, but they'd still have 2D,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:50:41PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Linus, can we ever drop those old paths? Maybe after the new bits have
been around for awhile?
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Which is functionally
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14535
Torsten Landschoff tors...@debian.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tors...@debian.org
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25953
--- Comment #2 from Yury u...@mail.ru 2010-01-09 15:14:24 PST ---
Thank you. It works.
I wonder why radeon_drm.h file is absent in Mesa distribution.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25953
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2010-01-09 15:18:03 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Thank you. It works.
I wonder why radeon_drm.h file is absent in Mesa distribution.
It's not provided by mesa. It's provided by
I've been noticing for a while that i've been getting general
protection faults in ttm_to_swapout, this time i was printk'ing the
virtual addresses.
In case it's not obvious, the result of kmap_atomic() is wrong.
This is nouveau/linux-2.6 which is somewhere after 2.6.32. I was
wondering if
12 matches
Mail list logo
