On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:10:06AM +, Simon Cahuk wrote:
Hi,
Alan, is the Glide3-FreeBSD tag the new branch or is there a newer one?
There are currently four branches on Glide3.
Glide3 - x86 architecture Linux
Glide3-64bit - Alpha architecture Linux
Glide3-FreeBSD - x86/Alpha FreeBSD
Hello
It would be great if there is a feature list on the dri website.
That tells the progress of the driver, in other words what features
of the Chip ist are allready supported and what features are not support.
In the moment the Driver status page only tells you if the chip works
or doesn't
Hello
I made some Benchmark comparisons with my Video card under WinME and Linux,
here are the resulst:
Perhaps using the new tdfx driver branch 3.1, DRI inbuild Mesa 3.5 and Kernel 2.4
could be a little
bit faster.
Linux vs. WindowsME
Hello
i want to update my Linux Kernel 2.2.18 to 2.2.19 can this
brake my working DRI driver modules?
So that i have to recompile the dri tree again?
Best Regards
Oliver C.
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I read at http://dri.sourceforge.net/faq/faq_display.phtml?id=12
that Gareth and others are working on a DRI Developers Guide.
Is there a timeline?
How far has the project progressed?
What is done until now?
When will this Guide be available for download?
What has still to get done?
Ok
Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
gears.
I get 125.623 frames/s.
The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march.
The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram.
gears was startet under KDE2.1
Is the benchmark value good or bad?
In other words,
