I've built DRI CVS along with Mesa CVS to get test my IGP340M on the 2.6.1
kernel. I'd like to report success. Note: this chipset has no TCL.
glinfo (I cut GL_EXTENSIONS from here):
disabling TCL support
GL_VERSION: 1.2 Mesa 6.1
GL_RENDERER: Mesa DRI Radeon 20030328 AGP 4x x86/MMX/SSE2 NO-TCL
If anyone complains of getting the following errors at startx:
mtrr: 0xf800,0x200 overlaps existing 0xf800,0x100
mtrr: 0xf800,0x200 overlaps existing 0xf800,0x100
[drm:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_cp_init called without lock held
[drm:radeon_unlock]
How should this affect DRI 3d drivers? According to the documenation:
http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/DRIintro.html
it says Most DRI 3D drivers today are based on Mesa. How so?
Is it that the 3d drivers (_dri.so's) use the Mesa Library to to
catch OpenGL calls and map them onto hardware events? I
This sounds like a great idea indeed. There are many questions, I'm sure.
One that comes to mind is:
*Who* would be able to vote?
Luis
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Alex Deucher wrote:
This proposal comes up periodically on this and other xfree lists, but
never really goes anywhere. Why not
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-06 18:33 ---
Hi Christopher,
The problem isn't that 3D isn't supported by DRI, but rather that the Linux
kernel does not yet support agpgart on Radeon IGP chipsets, and without working
agpgart, you have no DRI. Theoretically
