Re: [Dri-devel] Final new code in texmem-0-0-1 branch (take 2)

2003-03-14 Thread Jens Owen
Ian, Looks like you've been busy. Here are some comments from the 10,000' level. Keep in mind I haven't looked at your branch, yet. So feel free to point me at the code if my comments are way off base. Ian Romanick wrote: Most of the changes that were in my previous Final new code in

Re: [Dri-devel] Final new code in texmem-0-0-1 branch (take 2)

2003-03-14 Thread Brian Paul
Jens Owen wrote: Ian, Looks like you've been busy. Here are some comments from the 10,000' level. Keep in mind I haven't looked at your branch, yet. So feel free to point me at the code if my comments are way off base. Ian Romanick wrote: Most of the changes that were in my previous Final

Re: [Dri-devel] Final new code in texmem-0-0-1 branch (take 2)

2003-03-14 Thread Ian Romanick
Jens Owen wrote: How would you cope with Applications that query a capability, but force indirect rendering? Wouldn't they be misguided into thinking GLX_NV_vertex_array_range was present in the server, when it's probably not available? I believe the DRI is the first project where HW