David D. Hagood wrote:
Having recently upgraded to an SMP system, I was wondering if any of the
work done on PMesa was slated to be ported to the mainline DRI code - it
would be nice to allow applications to use both CPUs to do the setup work.
There are no plans to do so. The PMesa project
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote:
But maybe it is related to my 2.5.42-mm1 kernel. It do not include the latest
DRI CVS DRM code and DRI CVS DRM do not compile with this kernel.
Actually, you should be able to just use the in-kernel DRM code, since it
is actually up-to-date wrt
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Actually, you should be able to just use the in-kernel DRM code, since it
is actually up-to-date wrt the CVS tree apart from some minor MGA DMA
updates and an added pci_enable_device() - which should be a non-issue
Is it at DRM 1.6.0 release? I was looking at running
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 21:09 schrieb David D. Hagood:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Actually, you should be able to just use the in-kernel DRM code, since it
is actually up-to-date wrt the CVS tree apart from some minor MGA DMA
updates and an added pci_enable_device() - which should be a
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 20:49 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote:
But maybe it is related to my 2.5.42-mm1 kernel. It do not include the
latest DRI CVS DRM code and DRI CVS DRM do not compile with this kernel.
Actually, you should be able to just use the
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, David D. Hagood wrote:
Is it at DRM 1.6.0 release?
It's up-to-date wrt all the drivers in CVS, and yes, for radeon the
current version is 1.6.0.
I was looking at running 2.5.x, since that
would seem to be a better fit to an SMP machine than 2.4.19,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote:
But I didn't get this with 2.4.19/2.4.20-preX plus DRI CVS DRM module.
Hmm.. I'm looking at the diff beween DRI CVS and the kernel tree, and all
of it is purely semantic or due to the workqueue stuff in 2.5.x (which is
also the reason why DRI CVS
Having recently upgraded to an SMP system, I was wondering if any of the
work done on PMesa was slated to be ported to the mainline DRI code - it
would be nice to allow applications to use both CPUs to do the setup work.
---
This sf.net
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 18:13 schrieb David D. Hagood:
Having recently upgraded to an SMP system, I was wondering if any of the
work done on PMesa was slated to be ported to the mainline DRI code - it
would be nice to allow applications to use both CPUs to do the setup work.
Not that I
Dieter Nützel wrote:
Not that I know. Help is very welcome.
Which gfk do you own? ATI r100/r200?
Then please do some testing with multiple OpenGL context on your system.
There are some problems/bugs left.
Regards,
Dieter
I have an ATI 7500 DW, so I'd be glad to test. What sorts of tests
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 18:47 schrieb David D. Hagood:
Dieter Nützel wrote:
Not that I know. Help is very welcome.
Which gfk do you own? ATI r100/r200?
Then please do some testing with multiple OpenGL context on your
system. There are some problems/bugs left.
Regards,
11 matches
Mail list logo