Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-14 Thread Brian Paul
David D. Hagood wrote: Having recently upgraded to an SMP system, I was wondering if any of the work done on PMesa was slated to be ported to the mainline DRI code - it would be nice to allow applications to use both CPUs to do the setup work. There are no plans to do so. The PMesa project

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: But maybe it is related to my 2.5.42-mm1 kernel. It do not include the latest DRI CVS DRM code and DRI CVS DRM do not compile with this kernel. Actually, you should be able to just use the in-kernel DRM code, since it is actually up-to-date wrt

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread David D. Hagood
Linus Torvalds wrote: Actually, you should be able to just use the in-kernel DRM code, since it is actually up-to-date wrt the CVS tree apart from some minor MGA DMA updates and an added pci_enable_device() - which should be a non-issue Is it at DRM 1.6.0 release? I was looking at running

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 21:09 schrieb David D. Hagood: Linus Torvalds wrote: Actually, you should be able to just use the in-kernel DRM code, since it is actually up-to-date wrt the CVS tree apart from some minor MGA DMA updates and an added pci_enable_device() - which should be a

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 20:49 schrieb Linus Torvalds: On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: But maybe it is related to my 2.5.42-mm1 kernel. It do not include the latest DRI CVS DRM code and DRI CVS DRM do not compile with this kernel. Actually, you should be able to just use the

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, David D. Hagood wrote: Is it at DRM 1.6.0 release? It's up-to-date wrt all the drivers in CVS, and yes, for radeon the current version is 1.6.0. I was looking at running 2.5.x, since that would seem to be a better fit to an SMP machine than 2.4.19,

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: But I didn't get this with 2.4.19/2.4.20-preX plus DRI CVS DRM module. Hmm.. I'm looking at the diff beween DRI CVS and the kernel tree, and all of it is purely semantic or due to the workqueue stuff in 2.5.x (which is also the reason why DRI CVS

[Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread David D. Hagood
Having recently upgraded to an SMP system, I was wondering if any of the work done on PMesa was slated to be ported to the mainline DRI code - it would be nice to allow applications to use both CPUs to do the setup work. --- This sf.net

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 18:13 schrieb David D. Hagood: Having recently upgraded to an SMP system, I was wondering if any of the work done on PMesa was slated to be ported to the mainline DRI code - it would be nice to allow applications to use both CPUs to do the setup work. Not that I

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread David D. Hagood
Dieter Nützel wrote: Not that I know. Help is very welcome. Which gfk do you own? ATI r100/r200? Then please do some testing with multiple OpenGL context on your system. There are some problems/bugs left. Regards, Dieter I have an ATI 7500 DW, so I'd be glad to test. What sorts of tests

Re: [Dri-devel] PMesa and DRI

2002-10-13 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2002 18:47 schrieb David D. Hagood: Dieter Nützel wrote: Not that I know. Help is very welcome. Which gfk do you own? ATI r100/r200? Then please do some testing with multiple OpenGL context on your system. There are some problems/bugs left. Regards,