[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Problem with latest trunk and i810?

2003-05-29 Thread Jens Owen
My apologies for sending my first reply to dri-devel. This is really a dri-users configuration issue. However, there is one aspect to this posting that may be very relevant to dri-devel. Jens Owen wrote: I remember a recent change to support a 32 bit depth buffer and I wonder if that's on by

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Problem with latest trunk and i810?

2003-05-29 Thread Keith Whitwell
Jens Owen wrote: My apologies for sending my first reply to dri-devel. This is really a dri-users configuration issue. However, there is one aspect to this posting that may be very relevant to dri-devel. Jens Owen wrote: I remember a recent change to support a 32 bit depth buffer and I

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Problem with latest trunk and i810?

2003-05-29 Thread Jens Owen
R Deepak wrote: Hi, I use RedHat 9 with a custom compiled 2.4.21-rc4 and the latest DRI (checked out two hours back :). But DIR doesn't seem to work with my i810 chipset. I'm attaching my 'dmesg' and 'XFree86.0.log'. Any help would be nice. :) (logs compressed because of the 40kb limit!) glxinfo

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Problem with latest trunk and i810?

2003-05-29 Thread Keith Whitwell
Jens Owen wrote: Keith Whitwell wrote: Jens Owen wrote: My apologies for sending my first reply to dri-devel. This is really a dri-users configuration issue. However, there is one aspect to this posting that may be very relevant to dri-devel. Jens Owen wrote: I remember a recent change to

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Problem with latest trunk and i810?

2003-05-29 Thread Jens Owen
Keith Whitwell wrote: Jens Owen wrote: Keith Whitwell wrote: Jens Owen wrote: My apologies for sending my first reply to dri-devel. This is really a dri-users configuration issue. However, there is one aspect to this posting that may be very relevant to dri-devel. Jens Owen wrote: I

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Problem with latest trunk and i810?

2003-05-29 Thread Jens Owen
Keith Whitwell wrote: Jens Owen wrote: My apologies for sending my first reply to dri-devel. This is really a dri-users configuration issue. However, there is one aspect to this posting that may be very relevant to dri-devel. Jens Owen wrote: I remember a recent change to support a 32 bit