The DRI snapshots can be used with the Xorg packages in Debian
experimental. I've edited the wiki to reflect this. Hope that's OK!
I've got the r200 snapshot working happily[1].
cheers, Phil
[1] PageFlip seems broken however -- rendering errors with Quake4[2] at
least, which go away when
The DRI snapshots can be used with the Xorg packages in Debian
experimental. I've edited the wiki to reflect this. Hope that's OK!
I've got the r200 snapshot working happily[1].
cheers, Phil
[1] PageFlip seems broken however -- rendering errors with Quake4[2] at
least, which go away when
Hi,
snapshots are broken due to a missing texutil.h:
gcc-3.3 -c -O2 -gstabs+ -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wundef
-pipe -g -I../../../../../../exports/include/X11
Just to let everybody know that all snapshots are failing ATM.
I get the following error on all logs:
gcc -m32 -o xf86cfg -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -pedantic
-Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 00:37, Jos Fonseca wrote:
Just to let everybody know that all snapshots are failing ATM.
I get the following error on all logs:
gcc -m32 -o xf86cfg -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -pedantic
-Wall -Wpointer-arith
Hi,
there were 2 reports from snapshot users on dri-users that DRI was
disabled with the new configuration stuff. In at least one case the
problem was that libexpat was not installed on the system. Could the
snapshot build be changed to link the drivers statically with libexpat?
In either case
Felix,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:06:51AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
Hi,
there were 2 reports from snapshot users on dri-users that DRI was
disabled with the new configuration stuff. In at least one case the
problem was that libexpat was not installed on the system. Could the
snapshot
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:17:23 +0100
José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:06:51AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
Hi,
there were 2 reports from snapshot users on dri-users that DRI was
disabled with the new configuration stuff. In at least one case the
Should we stop producing snapshots temporarily until the
xaa/compiler/who-knows-what problems are resolved?
There seem to be a lot of complaints about the ones up there now...
Keith
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 03:24:56PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Should we stop producing snapshots temporarily until the
xaa/compiler/who-knows-what problems are resolved?
There seem to be a lot of complaints about the ones up there now...
Keith
I have no problem stopping the snapshot builds,
We also haven't recived feedback regarding non-radeon cards.
I would be happy to give some feedback on mach64 - but I am using Leif's
spanshots now (2.96-built AFAIK) - just because they give me xvideo.
Leif, are you still using 2.96 or moving to 3.x?
Regards,
Sergey
I'm using 2.96, so I think I may have to start including all the DRI stuff
in my patched XV binaries to avoid binary compatibility problems. This
can also be caused by changes to the SAREA in the DRI branch, so I think
it might be easier to keep things in sync that way. I got one report from
I haven't tried the snapshots and I haven't heard from anyone using the
vanilla snapshots without my patches yet, so I'm not sure if there are any
problems there.
Well, at least I can confirm that in my mostly 3.1-based system (at
least the kernel and XFree are 3.1-built) your 2.96-based
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 04:25, Andy Dustman wrote:
Still getting the same problem with the r200. Interestingly, the amount
of memory used for textures has gone up recently, from about 93 MB to
113 MB. Most obvious feature of this is what looks like a NULL pointer
reference at the end. Also
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:32:32PM -0400, Andy Dustman wrote:
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 09:25, José Fonseca wrote:
I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has
gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version.
AFAIK this shouldn't pose any problem to
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 03:40, Charl P. Botha wrote:
serious note, have you tried replacing your libxaa.a yet to eliminate
the possibility of that signal 11 that we've been seeing with the last
few snapshots? You could also try a snapshot of today or later, because
Michel has fixed the XAA
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 19:22, José Fonseca wrote:
AFAIK the announced breakeage concerned C++ only.
Well, there is some c++ code in libnurbs, and so apparently libGLU.so.
However it appears that wouldn't affect the DRI snapshots.
RedHat does indeed provides a compat-gcc package. I'll see
Am Freitag, 27. September 2002 03:20 schrieb Andy Dustman:
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 19:22, José Fonseca wrote:
AFAIK the announced breakeage concerned C++ only.
Well, there is some c++ code in libnurbs, and so apparently libGLU.so.
However it appears that wouldn't affect the DRI snapshots.
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 20:50, Andy Dustman wrote:
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 03:40, Charl P. Botha wrote:
serious note, have you tried replacing your libxaa.a yet to eliminate
the possibility of that signal 11 that we've been seeing with the last
few snapshots? You could also try a snapshot
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 09:25, José Fonseca wrote:
I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has
gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version.
AFAIK this shouldn't pose any problem to the users since the key issue
is that the kernel modules are
Hi guys. Yep, vacations ended.
I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has gcc 3.2. So now
forward the snapshots will be built with this version. AFAIK this shouldn't pose any
problem to the users since the key issue is that the kernel modules are compiled with
the
Hi Jose
I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has gcc 3.2. So
now forward the snapshots will be built with this version. AFAIK this shouldn't pose
any problem to the users since the key issue is that the kernel modules are compiled
with the same version of gcc
22 matches
Mail list logo
