Module Size Used by
appletalk 27696 2
ax25 45784 2
ipx21164 2
radeon 94112 0
this of course on 2.6.15, since 2.6.16 completely hangs, and no other info
can be gathered.
BTW, modprobe-ing radeon.ko (no Xorg
Tassinari [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments?
Btw
The ID removed by Dave's patch is the only ID listed for an RV370
chips
(the other RV370's aren't listed in the radeon DRM driver).
I suspect Dave and Mauro having unrelated problems.
Linus
cu
Adrian
The X300 has two pci ids:
:05:00.0 0300: 1002:5b60
:05:00.1
On 2/13/06, Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, den 13.02.2006, 16:27 -0700 schrieb Jesse Allen:
Well a while back, I hacked in the pci id for my Xpress 200M (5955),
which is basically an RV370 with no dedicated vram. I did the same
thing and claimed an RV350, which is the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments?
Btw, the fact that Mauro has the same exact PCI ID (well,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Dave's patch removes the entry for the card with the 0x5b60.
According to his bug report, Mauro has a Radeon X300SE that should
have the 0x5b70 according to pci.ids from pciutils
No. Look closer:
04:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI
On 2/13/06, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments?
Btw,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The one thing I have not yet been proven wrong for is that this PCI id
is the only one we have in this driver for an RV370.
It definitely is an RV370, you're right in that. I'm too lazy to actually
see if the other entries that claim to be RV350's
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So I decided to just remove it. Even if there is some other bug that could
make it work again, we can always just re-add it at that time. In the
meantime, this should fix both DaveJs and Mauros problems, and is clearly
no worse than 2.6.15
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments?
Btw, the fact that Mauro has the same exact PCI ID (well, lspci stupidly
suppresses the ID entirely, but the string seems to match the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:42:09PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:50:52AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
...
I just worry whether (a) the other added PCI ID's are any good for that
core and (b) whether the bug was really introduced with some of the other
changes. I admit that (b) is pretty unlikely, but it would be good to
test.
On 2/13/06, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The one thing I have not yet been proven wrong for is that this PCI id
is the only one we have in this driver for an RV370.
It definitely is an RV370, you're right in that. I'm too lazy to
Am Montag, den 13.02.2006, 16:27 -0700 schrieb Jesse Allen:
On 2/13/06, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The one thing I have not yet been proven wrong for is that this PCI id
is the only one we have in this driver for an RV370.
It
14 matches
Mail list logo
