Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-21 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:05:27PM -0500, Daniel Vogel wrote: There is no way in hell UT2k3 will run on MGA. It *REQUIRES* ARB_texture_env_combine, which is not supported by that hardware. Even if it didn't require that extension, good grief man, why torture yourself like that?!? :)

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Brown
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which is purported to not need S3TC extensions), I get the following traceback reported by

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Leif Delgass
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 --

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Daniel Vogel
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which is purported to not need S3TC

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:25:16PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which is purported to not

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:53:25PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 06:13:01PM -0500, Daniel Vogel wrote: [ 6] /usr/X11R6/lib/modules-dri-trunk/dri/mga_dri.so [0x43f31fb7] [ 7] /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo/System/OpenGLDrv.so(DrawPrimitive__ 22FOpenGLRenderInterface14EPrimitiveType+0x373) Might be interesting to know why it

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Leif Delgass
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Daniel Vogel wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 --

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Daniel Vogel
Based on the MESA_DEBUG log, It looks like ARB_texture_env_combine isn't supported in the MGA driver. I see defines for what look like combiner That's a no go as we rely on this extension. The game should probably assert in this case. -- Daniel, Epic Games Inc.

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Ian Romanick
Philip Armstrong wrote: phil@trigger /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo ./ut2003_demo Xlib: extension XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD missing on display :0.0. Ignore this. This is UT2k3 trying to determine which way to do fullscreen. Either the XFree86 way or the XiG way. [ 4]

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Ian Romanick
Leif Delgass wrote: Based on the MESA_DEBUG log, It looks like ARB_texture_env_combine isn't supported in the MGA driver. I see defines for what look like combiner registers, but it's not implemented in the driver yet (I don't have hardware docs myself so I don't know the specifics of what the

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Daniel Vogel
There is no way in hell UT2k3 will run on MGA. It *REQUIRES* ARB_texture_env_combine, which is not supported by that hardware. Even if it didn't require that extension, good grief man, why torture yourself like that?!? :) FWIW, the Windows version of UT2003 even runs (badly) on Intel 810