Re: [Dri-devel] problems with CVS head and i810

2002-12-17 Thread Keith Whitwell
Dave Airlie wrote: Removing the Option XvMCSurfaces 6 from my XF86Config file seems to make everyone a bit happier again... will do some more testing tomorrow to make sure this is what was causing it .. and I meant glxgears from RH7.3.. hands were ahead of brain yesterday.. Well for me this

Re: [Dri-devel] no keyboard control over X server ?

2002-12-17 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 01:12:32PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:58:27AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: I can't stop the X server any more by hitting ctrl-alt-backspace and I can't switch to any virtual console with alt-F? Mistake on my end ? No, a side

Re: [Dri-devel] R200 notes issues

2002-12-17 Thread Andy Ross
Keith Whitwell wrote: Andy Ross wrote: ATI blows you guys away in glxgears. I see 38% faster frame rates with their drivers. Actually what gears does most is glClear and glXSwapBuffers, with a small amount of glCallList. You can speed up swapbuffers by turning page flipping on in the

Re: [Dri-devel] R200 notes issues

2002-12-17 Thread Ian Romanick
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:59:57AM -0800, Andy Ross wrote: So technically, there is a DRI compliance issue here. I've attached the little test that I wrote to illustrate the problem. It draws four adjacent checkerboard quads and cycles between the wrap modes on key presses. With GL_CLAMP,

Re: [Dri-devel] lockups w/ AGP 4x

2002-12-17 Thread Ian Romanick
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:45:45PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Using the texmem-0-0-1 branch from CVS and enabling AGP 4x in XF86Config-4 causes X to lock upon startup. If I have my xinitrc setup to run Quake III alone, I first get the bare black and white X background and cursor

Re: [Dri-devel] R200 notes issues

2002-12-17 Thread Ian Romanick
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 01:52:05PM -0800, Andy Ross wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: Heh...look at demos/texwrap.c in Mesa. This does basically the same thing, but it enumerates all of the advertised modes, even the various mirror modes. Silly me. Why bother trying to learn about something

RE: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] i810 cleanup

2002-12-17 Thread Dave Airlie
Nice one, that gets rid of my tearing - thanks Matthew, it works except now I get some jumpiness on my screen when a new texture is coming on, I've got 5 rotating reels of 4 textured quads and when the new ones are about to come on the top of the reel it seems to jump a bit... Not sure if the

[Dri-devel] patch for host.def

2002-12-17 Thread Philip Brown
Attached is a patch for host.def, so that things will compile on solaris at a basic level. [course, nothing will WORK yet. but, one thing at a time] Note that I originally posted this to the Bugs database on sourceforge, but got an email that I shouldnt do that. If folks shouldnt do that, then

Re: [Dri-devel] patch for host.def

2002-12-17 Thread Alan Hourihane
And which host.def is this a patch against ? It does not match the trunk's versions at all. For a start there is no definition of LinuxDistribution in the trunks host.def file. You shouldn't need OS level patches like this at the host.def level. Please post more details on the errors that you

Re: [Dri-devel] patch for host.def

2002-12-17 Thread Philip Brown
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:17:29AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: And which host.def is this a patch against ? It does not match the trunk's versions at all. For a start there is no definition of LinuxDistribution in the trunks host.def file. You shouldn't need OS level patches like this at

Re: [Dri-devel] patch for host.def

2002-12-17 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:49:48PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:17:29AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: And which host.def is this a patch against ? It does not match the trunk's versions at all. For a start there is no definition of LinuxDistribution in the trunks

Re: [Dri-devel] patch for host.def

2002-12-17 Thread Philip Brown
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:57:45AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: HasGlide3 is set to NO by default and only enabled on Linux with an i386 or Alpha architecture. Good to know that it is fixed in later versions. I was using Solaris i386, so I was probably running afoul of old bad assumptions

RE: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] i810 cleanup

2002-12-17 Thread Dave Airlie
Well that's a dodgy application on my part.. it now works sync'd with it .. How should I do this without changing the kernel i810 module? is there an way from the OpenGL level to do this that I could propogate down? Dave. Dave Airlie said: Nice one, that gets rid of my tearing - thanks