Hello to all folks :-)
Yes it's hard work for developers ... but what will happen if it is tooo
easy :-)
Anybody there who has another mirror for DRI cvs tree as vcs or rsync? This
one in UK will be not very stable and not very often online :-(
Maybe we can collect a list of all known and maybe
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 04:06 ---
I tried to apply your agp patch to a 2.4.21. I had to do it by hand and I get an
error while compiling at this line:
agp_bridge.num_of_masks = 1;
I read that there was some
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 04:55 ---
If only it was this simple... :) You have to consider all possible combinations
of patched/unpatched X server, DRM and 3D driver.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 05:25 ---
Hi Hui, I'm back online and with good news.
Yes, after replacing the kernel's drm driver with the one from dri with your
patch, my card works fine in AGP4!!!
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 05:41 ---
Direct copies to the framebuffer may actually be faster than using the CP for
image writes on some systems. Can you also do the same comparison with different
ROPs though,
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 06:14 ---
Michel, about the backwards compatibility it seems not a problem. With the
same xfree/dri with Hui's patch but a different kernel (2.4.22-pre6) without
the patch, Xfree
Martin Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we can collect a list of all known and maybe tested mirror pages ...
and repost on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. rsync -avz --delete rsync://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/dri/HEAD/ HEAD/
2.
I'm currently trying to collect experience on how reliable I can
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla
bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require
attention.
All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched
in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at them, and
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 07:29 ---
Consider for example an unpatched X server with a patched DRM (only one of eight
scenarios to consider): the DRI will be enabled, but the DRM will read the new
fb_base
Martin,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:53:31AM +0200, Martin Zimmermann wrote:
Hello to all folks :-)
Yes it's hard work for developers ... but what will happen if it is tooo
easy :-)
Anybody there who has another mirror for DRI cvs tree as vcs or rsync? This
one in UK will be not very
Jos - if you want space on ftp.linux.org.uk for the archive I can
arrange that easily enough. Swansea University ought to be stable though
except for their power maintenance days in summer IMHO.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:54:31AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
The driTextureObject represents what's going
on in the hardware, and the Mesa gl_texture_object represents what's
going on in OpenGL.
Ok I've attached a new patch which makes dirty_images[0] work on hwlevels.
Is this more to your
What's up with the @user.sourceforge.net wildcard?
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 07:29:34 -0700
Subject: Your message to Dri-patches awaits moderator approval
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your mail to
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 16:49, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
What's up with the @user.sourceforge.net wildcard?
Neither * nor .* seemed to work, so I simply put in all DRI project
members manually. I've added you now.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 11:06 ---
Michel, thank you for your explanation, now I understand the problem. Now if
the field is added in the end of the struct, the old xfree does not read
garbage when trying
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 17:18, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 20:04 schrieb Ian Romanick:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 16:47, Dieter Nützel wrote:
radeon-new-buffer.diff is these one-liner:
Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding.
Index: radeon_tcl.c
Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 17:31 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 17:18, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 20:04 schrieb Ian Romanick:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 16:47, Dieter Nützel wrote:
radeon-new-buffer.diff is these one-liner:
With latest DRI CVS (thank you very much for rsync!) I can run manywin 100
or more! Only KDE can not calculate the prog mini icons so fast...;-)
glthreads -n 28, glthreads -n 50 hangs during second run.
SYSRQ+S, SYSRQ+E and init 1 and then init 5 can restart system.
wincopy is running but
Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 20:04 schrieb Ian Romanick:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 16:47, Dieter Nützel wrote:
#define NEW_PRIMITIVE() RADEON_NEWPRIM( rmesa )
-#define NEW_BUFFER() radeonRefillCurrentDmaRegion( rmesa )
+#define NEW_BUFFER()
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 12:19 ---
If only it was this simple... :) You have to consider all possible
combinations
of patched/unpatched X server, DRM and 3D driver.
What I was trying to say is that the
Dave Airlie wrote:
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied/patches/dri/i810_tex_upload.diff
The patch looks fine.
I used the texenv demos from Mesa 5.0 to test this, I tested it with the
old driver and this one, and they both look the same..
Have you tried it with anything else? Quake3? Think Tanks
Dave Airlie wrote:
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied/patches/dri/i810_tex_upload.diff
I used the texenv demos from Mesa 5.0 to test this, I tested it with the
old driver and this one, and they both look the same..
however neither of them show the intensity row like my Nvidia card on my
main desktop
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 10:51, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Paul Zaremba [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried Tuxracer on a powerpc machine + an ATI 7500 (r200)
with a 20030504 snapshot of DRI (xlibmesa-gl1) and I experienced
glitches. I tried a 20030425 snapshot which
Hi, my name is Ricardo.
I'm using Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r1 and since i haven't been able to
install my ADSL modem and configure it,
i don't have internet under it, wich means i'm doing all the downloads
with Windows(for now).
I´m having problems with the Ati Radeon driver .tar.bz2 file, i've tried
24 matches
Mail list logo
