http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 01:58 ---
Note that the radeon driver has all the problems listed here in this bug too.
It is NOT just the r128 driver. Although it appears radeon is a sub-
module, needing r128.
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:01:22 -0700
Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:58:58 -0700
Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
Do the __driRegisterExtensions functions in the drivers rely on being
called during
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla
bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require
attention.
All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched
in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at them, and
I'm inclined to believe that the comments in dri_glx.c are just
wrong. __glXRegisterExtensions has to be called before a call to
glXGetProcAddress. The app can query that string via
glXQueryExtensionsString long before calling glXGetProcAddress. In
fact, it may never call
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 01:22, Philip Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:44:48PM +0200, Michel Dnzer wrote:
The DDX driver needs to know to decide whether to enable the DRI with
PCI GART or disable it, but the kernel might be in a better position to
find out (though some XFree86 hackers
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 07:38 ---
radeon and r128 are basically independent drivers. The corresponding radeon
driver option is called CPusecTimeout.
--
Configure bugmail:
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 03:06, Ian Romanick wrote:
Antoine REVERSAT wrote:
I just compiled dri from the CVS for my radeon 9000 Mobbility card (r250 lf) and
it wont work as good as it is expected to (I.E : 30 fps in Quake3) The thing is
when i do a glxinfo it is reported as a r200 chip
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 10:35 ---
Neither the patch for the 2.4.18 kernel or the patch for the 2.4.22-pre8 are
working on my box. I didn't forget to select CONFIG_AGP_ATI and I am loading the
drm module
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 10:42 ---
Lots of people want working AGP. I don't see why it needs to wait ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 10:44 ---
Matthieu: Does it work for you if you do
modprobe agpgart agp_try_unsupported=1
?
If so, all we need to do to get it working for you without trouble is adding
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 11:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=439)
-- (http://bugs.xfree86.org/attachment.cgi?id=439action=view)
IGP 345M Kernel Patch for 2.4.21
This patch detects the IGP 345M with PCI ID
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 11:17 ---
Sorry Alan, I mean the DRM part.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:01:22 -0700
Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:58:58 -0700
Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
Do the __driRegisterExtensions functions in the drivers rely on being
called
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
I'm inclined to believe that the comments in dri_glx.c are just
wrong. __glXRegisterExtensions has to be called before a call to
glXGetProcAddress. The app can query that string via
glXQueryExtensionsString long before calling glXGetProcAddress. In
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 12:44 ---
Steven, thank you for your patch, it works on my box. It's still a little slow
but at least I have some 3d now.
--
Configure bugmail:
Am 2003.07.25 18:44:20 +0200 schrieb(en) Doug Rabson:
Oh, I meant to say also that if anyone is interested in tracking down
and fixing the r200 rendering problems, I can supply full buildable
source code to the low-level OpenGL parts of the engine.
nice, Im wondering nobody replied.
maybe
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 14:56 ---
Hmm, it seems fine... I haven't had a crash for about a month, using openGL heavily
(gentoo XFree86 build)
--
Configure bugmail:
The dynamic extension code has made the radeon drivers
dependent on the GLX subsystem. I just imported the
current r200 driver into my version of the embedded
Mesa system. Embedded Mesa doesn't have a GLX
subsystem. Neither does DirectFB.
What do you think about reworking these functions to
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:26, Ian Romanick wrote:
[...] we don't want the R200 driver to expose GLX_MESA_swap_control
if there's no vblank interrupt available. Since it can't implement
the functionality, we don't want to advertise it.
It could poll for vertical blank...
--
Earthling
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:58:58 -0700
Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
Hi,
as I'm going to clean up vsync related stuff on the config-0-0-1-branch
I read the code for dynamic glx extension registration in
xc/lib/GL/dri/dri_glx.c and
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:20:28 -0700
Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
I see:
C SPECIFICATION
const char * glXQueryExtensionsString( Display *dpy,
int screen )
I don't mean what the GLX specification says to
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:20:28 -0700
Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
I see:
C SPECIFICATION
const char * glXQueryExtensionsString( Display *dpy,
int screen )
I don't mean what the GLX specification
Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:26, Ian Romanick wrote:
[...] we don't want the R200 driver to expose GLX_MESA_swap_control
if there's no vblank interrupt available. Since it can't implement
the functionality, we don't want to advertise it.
It could poll for vertical blank...
I
Ian Romanick wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:20:28 -0700
Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
I see: C SPECIFICATION
const char * glXQueryExtensionsString( Display *dpy,
int screen )
I don't mean what
On Mer, 2003-07-30 at 22:28, Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:26, Ian Romanick wrote:
[...] we don't want the R200 driver to expose GLX_MESA_swap_control
if there's no vblank interrupt available. Since it can't implement
the functionality, we don't want to advertise it.
Alan Cox wrote:
On Mer, 2003-07-30 at 22:28, Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:26, Ian Romanick wrote:
[...] we don't want the R200 driver to expose GLX_MESA_swap_control
if there's no vblank interrupt available. Since it can't implement
the functionality, we don't want to
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-31-07 01:11 ---
I patched the kernel with the new DRM and IGP AGP stuff and am using XFree86
compiled right from CVS with the patch from here. I'm happy to say it *almost*
works for me.
Bryan Taylor wrote:
I have never written any flavor of driver before, but I would like to
learn how so that I can help out here. I know C and C++ fairly well
(FYI -- I'm 19 but I have been working in industry for 2 years). I have
a decent amount of time to spend on learning and/or coding,
Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 03:06, Ian Romanick wrote:
Antoine REVERSAT wrote:
I just compiled dri from the CVS for my radeon 9000 Mobbility card (r250 lf) and it
wont work as good as it is expected to (I.E : 30 fps in Quake3) The thing is when i do
a glxinfo it is reported as
31 matches
Mail list logo
