On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Jerome Glissegli...@freedesktop.org wrote:
I am working on patch to exercise this, i am especialy
interested in performances improvement we can have in
application which routinely call getimage for
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Jerome Glissegli...@freedesktop.org wrote:
I am working on improving 2D performances in KMS world and
i am starting to think that we don't need the split btw
read/write domain but only need one domain. My
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 15:56 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Jerome Glissegli...@freedesktop.org
wrote:
Corollary the TTM priority stuff is i believe a wrong idea
for radeon (could be usefull for
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:08 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 15:56 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Jerome Glissegli...@freedesktop.org
wrote:
Corollary the TTM priority stuff is i
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:05 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:08 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 15:56 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Jerome
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:12 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:05 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:08 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 15:56 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:31 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:12 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:05 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:08 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 15:56 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On
Jerome Glisse wrote:
Corollary the TTM priority stuff is i believe a wrong idea
for radeon (could be usefull for others GPU but i don't have
such feeling). So i would like to be able to disable it and
move the knowledge in radeon kernel driver, here is my thinking
on that :
The TTM
From 5e2851952729b287a82efa002b28a2095404d44d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Hellstrom thellst...@vmware.com
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:47:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ttm: Fix a potential comparison of structs.
On some architectures the comparison may cause a compilation failure.
Original
Pekka Paalanen skrev:
From 5e2851952729b287a82efa002b28a2095404d44d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Hellstrom thellst...@vmware.com
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:47:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ttm: Fix a potential comparison of structs.
On some architectures the comparison may cause a
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:12:18 +0200
Thomas Hellström thellst...@vmware.com wrote:
Pekka Paalanen skrev:
From 5e2851952729b287a82efa002b28a2095404d44d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Hellstrom thellst...@vmware.com
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:47:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ttm: Fix a
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23095
Summary: RV620+DRI: broken glxgears [bisected]
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23095
--- Comment #1 from Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com 2009-08-02 13:45:43 PST
---
Videos:
http://sirius.cs.put.poznan.pl/~inf80100/mesa/out-1.ogv
http://sirius.cs.put.poznan.pl/~inf80100/mesa/out-2.ogv
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23095
--- Comment #2 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2009-08-02 14:45:13 PST ---
The flickering has nothing to do with irq support.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13896
Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 broke expect and gcc's testsuite
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson mi...@it.uu.se
Date : 2009-07-29 11:00 (5 days old)
References:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23095
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2009-08-02 15:31:27 PST ---
Are you sure you're actually using the latest drm and mesa? I can't reproduce
any regression with glxgears here.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
--- Comment #4 from Michael S. Tsirkin m.s.tsir...@gmail.com 2009-08-02
22:49:49 ---
Opened a bug in freedesktop.org bugzilla - maybe this way
someone will look at it?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23096
--
Configure bugmail:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:06:14 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
(cc jbarnes)
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:50:38 +0200
Roel Kluin roel.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
dev_priv-saveSWF1 is a 16 element array, but this reads up to
index 22
20 matches
Mail list logo
