Re: [r2xx|r1xx] readpixels-3 and pntparam_1 - Progress?

2005-02-12 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
Roland Scheidegger schrieb: As for pntparam, I couldn't get it really working, and in this form it's overkill for what works (larger point sizes). I'm not so sure it's worth the trouble of whipping up a simpler patch which would only contain that, since only aliased larger point sizes are

[r2xx|r1xx] readpixels-3 and pntparam_1 - Progress?

2005-02-10 Thread Dieter Nützel
r100-readpixels-3.patch (Stephane) r200_pntparam_1.diff (Roland) I'm ran with both. Should they merged? BTW readpix sigfault is still there. (with and without both patches) X.org CVS do NOT show this bug. SunWave1 progs/demos# ./readpix GL_VERSION = 1.3 Mesa 6.3 GL_RENDERER = Mesa DRI R200

Re: [r2xx|r1xx] readpixels-3 and pntparam_1 - Progress?

2005-02-10 Thread Stephane Marchesin
Dieter Ntzel wrote: r100-readpixels-3.patch (Stephane) r200_pntparam_1.diff (Roland) I'm ran with both. Should they merged? I surely hope to get my readpixels patch merged. However, I found a serious flaw in it (not related to the readpixe segfault) which I have to fix before this happens.

Re: [r2xx|r1xx] readpixels-3 and pntparam_1 - Progress?

2005-02-10 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Stephane Marchesin wrote: Dieter Ntzel wrote: r100-readpixels-3.patch (Stephane) r200_pntparam_1.diff (Roland) I'm ran with both. Should they merged? I surely hope to get my readpixels patch merged. However, I found a serious flaw in it (not related to the readpixe segfault) which I have to fix