On Sunday 02 May 2010, Bruno Prémont wrote:
On Sun, 02 May 2010 Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Bruno [UTF-8] Prémont wrote:
On a IEI Kino 690S1 I'm having a hard time to get s2ram running.
It freezes during device suspend (unless I rmmod everything USB
On Tuesday 01 June 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Nigel Cunningham
ncunning...@crca.org.au wrote:
Hi all.
Just wondering if anyone else has tried to hibernate while using Radeon KMS
and a tree with Dave's post 2.6.34 patches? My 32 bit P4 based system (with
an
On Monday, June 14, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Alex, Dave,
I'm afraid hibernation is broken on all machines using radeon/KMS with r300
after commit ce8f53709bf440100cb9d31b1303291551cf517f
(drm/radeon/kms/pm: rework
On Tuesday, June 15, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, June 14, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday, June 14, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote
On Wednesday, June 16, 2010, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, June 15, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, June 14, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday
On Wednesday, June 16, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Wednesday, June 16, 2010, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, June 15, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday
On Thursday, June 17, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
2010/6/17 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
On Wednesday, June 16, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Wednesday, June 16, 2010, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010
On Friday, June 18, 2010, Matt Turner wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
...
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Probably want to shorten the commit title a bit.
In fact the title is just
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
I have recently noticed a 55 sec. delay during the device freeze
phase of hibernation on my test-bed HP nx6325. Due to the 100%
reproducibility of it I was able to narrow it down to
radeon_suspend_kms() and then it turned out that the delay occured
somewhere
On Friday, June 18, 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2010/6/18 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Thanks for you recent involvement in radeon driver!
Well, I'm just trying to address the issues I see on my test boxes.
I can see you used way shorter commit title
On Friday, June 18, 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 22:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
I have recently noticed a 55 sec. delay during the device freeze
phase of hibernation on my test-bed HP nx6325. Due to the 100%
reproducibility
On Saturday, June 19, 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 01:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, June 18, 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 22:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
I have recently noticed a 55
On Saturday, June 19, 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 01:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, June 18, 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 22:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
I have recently noticed a 55
On Saturday, June 19, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, June 19, 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 01:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, June 18, 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 22:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J
On Friday, July 23, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
On 07/23/2010 06:42 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know
On Sunday, August 01, 2010, Willi Mann wrote:
Hi!
On my Thinkpad T500 with Debian-compiled kernel 2.6.35~rc6-1~experimental.1,
I still get OOpses on suspend.
Did it happen with 2.6.34 or previous kernels?
The following OOPS has been found be using the platform method. I had to
[NOTE: This is the last summary report of regressions introduced between
2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Thanks for helping us with tracking these bugs!]
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.33 regressions introduced before
2.6.34, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
: [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
Submitter : tomas m tmezza...@gmail.com
Date: 2010-07-15 02:32 (46 days old)
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject : kernel BUG at fs
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
know either and we'll add
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:36:36 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
tracking team
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
know either and we'll add
] resume from suspend freezes system
Submitter : tomas m tmezza...@gmail.com
Date: 2010-07-15 02:32 (68 days old)
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=30822
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
know either and we'll add
: [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
Submitter : tomas m tmezza...@gmail.com
Date: 2010-07-15 02:32 (74 days old)
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=31422
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
know either and we'll add
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.34 regressions introduced before
2.6.35, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.34 regressions, please let us
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
know either and we'll add
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.34 regressions introduced before
2.6.35, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.34 regressions, please let us
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
know either and we'll add
On Monday, November 08, 2010, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
mar...@trippelsdorf.de wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:43:02PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:07:37PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08,
://git.kernel.org/linus/3e384ee6c687cb397581ee8f9440fc8220cfac80
Message-ID : 201011041706.59046.maciej.rute...@gmail.com
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=12684308982w=2
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi
On Friday, November 19, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.36,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
I cannot start KDE with the 2.6.37-rc3 kernel. The X server and display
manager start normally, but when I attempt to log into KDE, it attempts to
start, but then the X apparently crashes and this appears in the dmesg output
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
2010/11/23 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
I cannot start KDE with the 2.6.37-rc3 kernel. The X server and display
manager start normally, but when I attempt to log
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010, Alex Deucher wrote:
2010/11/23 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi
: 2010-11-21 13:32 (12 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23332
Subject : Boot failure on HP nx6325
Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Date: 2010-11-20 00:57 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit:
http://git.kernel.org/linus
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.35 regressions, please let us
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.36,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.36, please let us
know either and we'll add
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.35 regressions, please let us
[NOTE: This most likely is the last summary report of regressions introduced
between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36.]
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed
On Monday, January 10, 2011, David Miller wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:59:38 +0100 (CET)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24592
Subject : 2.6.37-rc5: NULL pointer oops in
selinux_socket_unix_stream_connect
On Monday, January 10, 2011, David Miller wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:59:38 +0100 (CET)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24592
Subject : 2.6.37-rc5: NULL pointer oops in
selinux_socket_unix_stream_connect
On Sunday, January 23, 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:52:27 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Sunday, January 23, 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:23:34 +0100, Michael Karcher
ker...@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de wrote:
The opregion
On Friday, January 28, 2011, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:51:01 -0500 (EST), Robert P. J. Day
rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
sadly, no change -- still black screen. again, rebooted
successfully under commit 8a327f23. just
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.37,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.37, please let us
know either and we'll add
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.36 regressions introduced before
2.6.37, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.36 regressions, please let us
On Thursday, February 03, 2011, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:42:05 -0800,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Carlos R. Mafra crmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu 3.Feb'11 at 1:03:41 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
If you know of any other unresolved
On Friday, January 14, 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Dual-GPU machines may provide more than one ACPI backlight interface. Tie
the backlight device to the GPU in order to allow userspace to identify
the correct interface.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett m...@redhat.com
Sorry for the late
On Sunday, February 06, 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:41:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, February 06, 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Ugh. Ok, how can we fix this?
Not nicely, I'm afraid.
One possible way is to use device_pm_move_after
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:01:25AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Yes, it seems so, but I'm not sure what the short term consequences of that
change will be. Perhaps there will be none. :-)
Ok, I'll have a play with that. Maybe we
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:32:35PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
I'm not familiar with video devices, but I agree, this situation does
feel broken. Is it the case that there's a PCI device as well as an
ACPI namespace Device for the same
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.36 regressions introduced before
2.6.37, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.36 regressions, please let us
On Sunday, February 13, 2011, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.36 and 2.6.37.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.37,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.37, please let us
know either and we'll add
[NOTE: Can maintainers _please_ merge patches listed below, especially those
that
have been known for weeks?]
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.36 regressions introduced before
2.6.37, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.37,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.37, please let us
know either and we'll add
(12 days old)
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/604371/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27202
Subject : Remote control of saa7134-based tv card ASUSTeK P7131
Hybrid stopped working in 2.6.37
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.37,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.37, please let us
know either and we'll add
On Sunday, March 27, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.37,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.38,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.38, please let us
know either and we'll add
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.37 regressions introduced before
2.6.38, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.37 regressions, please let us
[NOTE:
I have one request for whoever works on fixing the listed regressions. While
your work is highly appreciated anyway, if you have a patch fixing a listed
regression or you know of a commit fixing a listed regression, please drop
a notice into the corresponding Bugzilla entry. This will
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.37 regressions introduced before
2.6.38, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.37 regressions, please let us
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.38,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.38, please let us
know either and we'll add
[NOTE:
This most likely is the last summary report of post-2.6.37 regressions
introduced during the 2.6.38 development cycle. Please let us know what
the current status of those bugs is, if possible, and thanks for all of
the reports, updates and fixes.]
This message contains a list of some
On Friday, May 20, 2011, Ray Lee wrote:
[ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki
to the message ]
It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking
them any more now that 2.6.39 is out.
Thanks,
Rafael
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.39,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.39, please let us
know either and we'll add
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.38 regressions introduced before
2.6.39, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.38 regressions, please let us
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.39,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.39, please let us
know either and we'll add
)
Message-ID : 20110619133049.ga18...@liondog.tnic
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=130849028317365w=2
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/950852/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.38 regressions introduced before
2.6.39, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.38 regressions, please let us
On Sunday, July 10, 2011, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 12:19 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38702
Subject : 3.0.0-rc4-git6 - INFO: possible circular locking
dependency detected - (rdev-mtx
[NOTE:
We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982
but there are no reports linked to it, mostly because Maciej is on vacation,
but also because the frequency of reporting regressions has been low
recently. So, if you're
On Monday, August 15, 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:02:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[NOTE:
We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982
but there are no reports linked
This message contains a list of some regressions from 3.0,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 3.0, please let us
know either and we'll add them to
On Sunday, August 28, 2011, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 08:22:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41742
Subject: duplicate filename for intel_backlight with the i915
driver
Submitter : François
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.39 regressions introduced before
3.0, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.39 regressions, please let us know
This message contains a list of some regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 3.0 and 3.1, please let us
know either and
[I'm sorry if you receive this message twice, I seem to have problems with
sending it.]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you
This message contains a list of some regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 3.0 and 3.1, please let us
know either and
,
freezable workqueue and using it for disk-events polling.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu
CC: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
CC: sta...@kernel.org
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Thanks,
Rafael
---
I'm not sure who to send this patch to, since it is relevant
This message contains a list of some post-3.1 regressions introduced before
3.2, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-3.1 regressions, please let us know
either
Hi all,
We definitely aren't 100% in business yet with the tracking of regressions,
but since the Bugzilla is operational again, we can collect reports at least.
I'd like to use this opportunity to thank Maciej Rutecki and Florian Mickler
for their hard work on the regression tracking and to
On Friday, February 24, 2012, David Miller wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:51:20 +0100 (CET)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42776
Subject : OF-related boot crash in 3.3.0-rc3-00188-g3ec1e88
Submitter : Meelis
Hi all,
It looks like many people have switched away from the kernel Bugzilla
after the kernel.org outage and they are using various means of reporting
(and tracking) kernel bugs. For this reason, it's becoming increasingly
difficult for us to track all of the possible sources of reports and we
This message contains a list of some post-3.1 regressions introduced before
3.2, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-3.1 regressions, please let us know
either
This message contains a list of some regressions from 3.2,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 3.2, please let us
know either and we'll add them to
This message contains a list of some post-3.1 regressions introduced before
3.2, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-3.1 regressions, please let us know
either
On Sunday, March 18, 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Added Rafael to the Cc: Rafael, we're pondering over one or more of these
recurrent threads about corruption after resume, seemingly related to i915.
Thanks for letting me know. :-)
I actually have a confirmation that the issue isn't present if
Hi,
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012, Dave Airlie wrote:
Hi Rafael,
I've been investigating runtime PM support for some use-cases on GPUs.
In some laptops we have a secondary GPU (optimus) that can be powered
up for certain 3D tasks and then turned off when finished with. Now I
did an
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012, Dave Airlie wrote:
Hi Rafael,
I've been investigating runtime PM support for some use-cases on GPUs.
In some laptops we have a secondary
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012, Dave Airlie wrote:
Hi Rafael,
I've been investigating runtime PM
Sorry for the delayed response.
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, Sep
should work for CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME unset too and static inline stubs for
all runtime PM helpers are available in that case.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri
in practice.
For cpufreq and cpuidle:
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Arnd Bergmann (22):
can: move CONFIG_HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN out of CAN_DEV
cpufreq: ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ needs ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
cpuidle: calxeda: select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND
staging/drm: imx: add missing
unregistering ACPI backlight control for all
systems declaring win8 support, even though it may actually work for them.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri
isn't
available, then that's just a serious bug in gnome and should be fixed
asap. But imo that's not something we should try to (nor do I see any way
how to) work around in the kernel.
Agreed.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center
callbacks
*
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Monday, June 24, 2013 04:20:06 PM Shuah Khan wrote:
On 06/22/2013 03:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, June 22, 2013 02:11:14 PM Shuah Khan wrote:
Add a new interface get_pm_transition() to return pm_transition state.
This interface is intended to be used from dev_pm_ops class
)
+ acpi_video_backlight_unregister();
}
if (IS_GEN5(dev))
Well, this causes build failures to happen when the ACPI video driver is
modular and the graphics driver is not.
I'm not sure how to resolve that, so suggestions are welcome.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J
1 - 100 of 526 matches
Mail list logo
