On Friday, 28 of November 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Thursday, November 27, 2008 7:26 pm Dave Airlie wrote:
Hi Linus,
Please pull the 'drm-fixes' branch from
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git
drm-fixes
This larger than we wished patch, fixes a
On Saturday, 29 of November 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 28 of November 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Thursday, November 27, 2008 7:26 pm Dave Airlie wrote:
Hi Linus,
Please pull the 'drm-fixes' branch from
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6
On Friday 06 March 2009, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Don't really know where one should send Oops... Is there a better place than
linux-kernel?
dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net for one example (CCed).
Is this a regression and if so, then what's the last good kernel?
First time I see such an
On Sunday 08 March 2009, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:56PM +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
I tested several snapshots post 2.6.28 and all of them show one severe
problem: resume from disk is not always successful. Only about 50% of the
resume
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Hi,
I tested several snapshots post 2.6.28 and all of them show one severe
problem: resume from disk is not always successful. Only about 50% of the
resume attempts work, in the other cases I just get a completely black
screen, can't
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Angel wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list
On Monday 27 April 2009, Jos van der Ende wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:43:44 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Angel wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
I've tested with kernel 2.6.29.1. The problem still persists. While
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
days old)
First-Bad-Commit:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=123906202829074w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13325
Subject : 2.6.30-rc kills my box hard - and lockdep chains
Submitter : Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net
Date
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.29, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Monday 18 May 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:05:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way
On Friday 22 May 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13329
Subject : cifs_close: NULL pointer dereference
Submitter : Luca Tettamanti kronos...@gmail.com
Date
locking dependency detected
Submitter : Miles Lane miles.l...@gmail.com
Date: 2009-05-04 16:56 (21 days old)
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/25557/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13125
On Monday 25 May 2009, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13326
Subject : [PATCH]Null pointer dereference in rtc-cmos driver
Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan o...@pardus.org.tr
Date: 2009-05-14 16
-Bad-Commit:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=123906202829074w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:31:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list
.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=124349762314976w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow
=a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=123906202829074w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13074
Subject : gspca_stv06xx doesn't work with Logitech QuickCam Express
(046d:0840)
Submitter
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Sunday 31 May 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:55:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list
On Sunday 31 May 2009, Angel wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list
/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a0d4922da2e4ccb0973095d8d29f36f6b1b5f703
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=123906202829074w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13074
Subject : gspca_stv06xx doesn't work
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter : Laurent Riffard laurent.riff...@free.fr
Date: 2009-05-28 18:43 (11 days old
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Subject : [drm:drm_wait_vblank] failed to acquire vblank counter
Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov cij...@volny.cz
Date
[NOTE: I'll be traveling next week, so there won't be a summary report.]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved
Stezenbach j...@sig21.net
Date: 2009-06-16 01:27 (21 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638
Subject
On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi Rafael,
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 01:42:09 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me
know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any
of the entries below
On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
(cc jbarnes)
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:50:38 +0200
Roel Kluin roel.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
dev_priv-saveSWF1 is a 16 element array, but this reads up to index 22
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin roel.kl...@gmail.com
---
save_state does not do
: 2009-06-17 17:56 (47 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13891
Subject : PCI resources allocation problem on HP nx6325
Submitter : Rafael J
lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach j...@sig21.net
Date: 2009-06-16 01:27 (48 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry
On Monday 03 August 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13896
Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 broke expect and gcc's testsuite
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson mi...@it.uu.se
Date
On Monday 03 August 2009, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 03:22:01PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13815
Subject : emacs -nw compilation doesn't show the error message
Submitter : Aneesh Kumar K.V
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=124349762314976w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter : Laurent Riffard laurent.riff...@free.fr
On Monday 10 August 2009, Duncan wrote:
On Sunday 09 August 2009 13:44:24 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
=124349762314976w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter : Laurent Riffard laurent.riff...@free.fr
Date: 2009-05-28
On Thursday 20 August 2009, John Dykstra wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154
inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
Submitter : Ralf
On Friday 21 August 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
Submitter : okias d.ok...@gmail.com
Date: 2009-08-10 19:16 (10 days old)
The patch
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
: 2009-05-28 7:59 (90 days old)
First-Bad-Commit:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=124349762314976w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2009/8/25 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter : Rus harb...@sfinx.od.ua
Date: 2009-06-12 08:13
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=124349762314976w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
=linux-kernelm=125394827806011w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14214
Subject : BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1108!
Submitter : Plamen Petrov pvp-l...@fs.ru.acad.bg
Date: 2009-09-23 11:13 (9
[Notes:
* Quite a number of new regressions from 2.6.30 has been reported during
the last three weeks.
* The number of unresolved regressions 2.6.30 - 2.6.31 is now the second
highest ever.]
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and
2.6.31, for which
On Friday 02 October 2009, Stefan Richter wrote:
Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
If you add one more entry say Suspected commit : then it will be great
and will solve regressions much faster.
Will? Might.
In fact I add the First-Bad-Commit annotation where there is a bisection
result or
[Note:
We started to get more regression reports for 2.6.32-rc (100%+ jump in the
last 10 days. Nevertheless, we're still receiving new reports of regressions
from 2.6.30.]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.31, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of.
...@gmail.com
Date: 2009-09-06 07:01 (36 days old)
Handled-By : Alex Chiang achi...@hp.com
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/51834/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject
On Saturday 10 October 2009, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to port a graphics DRM device driver over to the new power
management hooks in
struct dev_pm_ops.
During the prepare call, Video RAM contents may be copied either to
shmem objects or pages allocated using
On Monday 12 October 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
On 10/11/2009 05:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[Note:
10 new reports in the last 10 days, but fortunately we're fixing them
faster
than they're being reported.]
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14181
On Monday 12 October 2009, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
Hi Rafael,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:41:30AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14185
Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class
Submitter : lars_erics...@telia.com
On Monday 12 October 2009, Andrew Patterson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 00:41 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14309
Subject : MCA on hp rx8640
Submitter : Andrew Patterson andrew.patter...@hp.com
Date
On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday 10 October 2009, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to port a graphics DRM device driver over to the new power
management hooks in
struct dev_pm_ops.
During the prepare call, Video
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.31, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.31, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and
2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30
and 2.6.31, please
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.31, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.31, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and
2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30
and 2.6.31, please
On Tuesday 17 November 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
On 11/16/2009 04:58 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30
and
2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of
them
have been fixed already
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.31, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.31, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and
2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30
and 2.6.31, please
Hi,
I'm not really sure where this should be reported, but here it goes.
After installing openSUSE 11.2 on my testbed nx6325 I noticed that resume
(from suspend to RAM) stopped working on it. Apparently, it hanged while
switching from the console back to X and the box remained completely
On Sunday 22 November 2009, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Hi,
I'm not really sure where this should be reported, but here it goes.
After installing openSUSE 11.2 on my testbed nx6325 I noticed that resume
(from suspend to RAM
[NOTES:
* I really hope that at least _some_ of the bugs below have been already
fixed, but I didn't have the time to search through all of the histories.
_Please_ let me know which of them can be closed.
* If you close one of the bugs in this list, please do your best to put the
hash
[NOTES:
* There you go, another round of tracking regressions. It's not too bad at
the moment, as far as the regressions from 2.6.32 are concerned, but we have
quite a few -stable regressions, apparently in the DRI area.
* Regressions from 2.6.31 are still being reported.]
This message
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2009/12/29 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14910
Subject : Stable version 2.6.32.2 broke my KMS Radeon setup
Submitter : Ruud Linders kerne...@xs4all.nl
Date
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote, On 12/29/2009 04:26 PM:
...
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14794
Subject : IP address assigned by DHCP is dropped after ~40
seconds
Submitter : Márton Németh nm
[CC to Jesse.]
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I've changed BUG_ON to WARN_ON in drm_gem.c (patch at bottom) to
get this dmesg when I resume after suspend, instead of crashing.
Perhaps it's a patch that should go in, perhaps not, but obviously
the real problem lies
On Tuesday 05 January 2010, Johannes Hirte wrote:
Am Dienstag 29 Dezember 2009 16:10:01 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915: implement
new pm ops for i915), among other things, removed the .suspend and
.resume pointers from the struct drm_driver object in i915_drv.c,
which broke resume without KMS on my MSI Wind U100.
Fix
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:06:59 -0800
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915: implement
new pm ops for i915), among other things, removed the .suspend and
.resume
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Which is functionally equivalent to my patch, because
i915_suspend/resume() won't
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010
-By : Yan, Zheng yanzh...@21cn.com
Patch :
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org/msg03686.html
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15026
Subject : i915: Resume regression on MSI Wind U100 w/o KMS
Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki r
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and
2.6.32, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.31
and 2.6.32, please
On Monday 11 January 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2010/1/10 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14747
Subject : bisected 2.6.32 regression: synaptics touchpad doesn't
work
Submitter : François Valenduc francois.valen
On Monday 11 January 2010, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:32:56PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from
On Monday 11 January 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:32:30 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the 2-3 years at a minimum, with at least one kernel with no
serious regressions in
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
