[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
To use the wonders of Bugzilla, you can use the following:
E-mail address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password: VGwpKzk
To change your password, go to:
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi
---
This SF.net email is
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-03 08:41 ---
Same problem ATI Radeon Mobility M9 (Dell Inspiron 8200)
--- You are
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=344
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=453
Summary: manywin (from Mesa)
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=453
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-17-07 18:31 ---
I have written an agpgart driver that probes the chipset (IGP320M) and sets up
the GART in 1-level GATT mode, with the TLB and the GART cache disabled.
I have no idea
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-18-07 10:16 ---
The colorfire screensaver also does the same thing - it runs for about 2
seconds, and then locks the system hard. According to the documentation,
This didn't take
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-19-07 11:11 ---
Here are the patches for the code on my system. It's in very early stage,
for test only.
What's working:
4x data rate on IGP320/340 internal graphics.
Mesa demos,
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-19-07 11:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=415)
-- (http://bugs.xfree86.org/attachment.cgi?id=415action=view)
Linux kernel patch for ATI IGP chipsets
The patch is built against the 2.4.18
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-19-07 11:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=416)
-- (http://bugs.xfree86.org/attachment.cgi?id=416action=view)
ATI IGP chipset DRI support
This is built on top of current XFree86 CVS
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-22-07 07:21 ---
Thank you Hui for doing this,
The kernel patch does not apply cleanly to vanilla 2.4.18 neither 2.4.19. I
applied it by hand against 2.4.18(*) whitch is the most close
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-22-07 09:04 ---
Hi Hui,
I also tried your patches, but with different success. The kernel patch worked ok
for me (vanilla 2.4.18, nu patch problems). AGP and DRM initialize fine.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-22-07 10:03 ---
Thanks for testing. One thing I can think of about the error you got is that
you might have loaded the original radeon dri module come with the Linux kernel
source. This
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-22-07 10:22 ---
Thanks for testing.
Thank you for your work Hui,
One thing I can think of about the error you got is that you might have
loaded the original radeon dri module come
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-22-07 10:32 ---
Hi Wouter, my previous message is the reply to Frederik Nosi (you got in before
I sent). You may have the same problem as Frederik -- loaded the original radeon
DRI kernel
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-22-07 11:44 ---
The correct thing to do then would be to bump the DRM minor version and only
attempt to initialize the DRI on IGP chips if the DRM has high enough a minor
version.
--
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-22-07 22:49 ---
The patch doesn't really break any existing code. You can apply the patch and
all supported cards should still work (if not, it's a bug). I've tested a 7500
breifly with
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 04:06 ---
I tried to apply your agp patch to a 2.4.21. I had to do it by hand and I get an
error while compiling at this line:
agp_bridge.num_of_masks = 1;
I read that there was some
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 04:55 ---
If only it was this simple... :) You have to consider all possible combinations
of patched/unpatched X server, DRM and 3D driver.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 05:25 ---
Hi Hui, I'm back online and with good news.
Yes, after replacing the kernel's drm driver with the one from dri with your
patch, my card works fine in AGP4!!!
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 05:41 ---
Direct copies to the framebuffer may actually be faster than using the CP for
image writes on some systems. Can you also do the same comparison with different
ROPs though,
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 06:14 ---
Michel, about the backwards compatibility it seems not a problem. With the
same xfree/dri with Hui's patch but a different kernel (2.4.22-pre6) without
the patch, Xfree
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 07:29 ---
Consider for example an unpatched X server with a patched DRM (only one of eight
scenarios to consider): the DRI will be enabled, but the DRM will read the new
fb_base
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 11:06 ---
Michel, thank you for your explanation, now I understand the problem. Now if
the field is added in the end of the struct, the old xfree does not read
garbage when trying
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-07 12:19 ---
If only it was this simple... :) You have to consider all possible
combinations
of patched/unpatched X server, DRM and 3D driver.
What I was trying to say is that the
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-25-07 05:04 ---
I have problems getting the patched drivers to work. I recompiled the kernel (2.
4.21-ac4) with the patche applied. The AGPGART modules loads without problems.
Then i
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-27-07 09:46 ---
Why does it come to me :-( ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 02:35 ---
Michel,
I just noticed this patch on your site:
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-reinit.diff
To me, that looks like a patch that might solve this problem. Is
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 05:53 ---
Can anyone send me the binaries ? I have some problems compiling XFree86.
gcc says: radeon_dri.c:743: structure has no member named `IsIGP'
I am compiling it from the cvs
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 06:28 ---
Matthiew, if you want to try the new driver for IGP, as Hui sayed, use the
xfree/dri sources with the xf-4_3_99_8 tag.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 06:57 ---
It won't help for the mode changes, but it's possible that it 'helps' for VT
switching back to the server by avoiding the problem.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 07:09 ---
I'm not sure this is all the same bug... anyway, has any of you tried a recent
DRI CVS snapshot?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-28-07 22:23 ---
Hi, Just wanted to share my positive experience with Hui Yu's patches.
I just bought a Sony VAIO FRV-25 (w/o the modem problem) running Gentoo, here's
an lspci after Hui's
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 04:54 ---
I patched everything as described by Fredo, but DRI Rendering is still NO. Here
is why (I think), who can have a good guess/tip to solve this?
drmOpenDevice: minor is 0
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |dri-
|
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 05:44 ---
This should work in XFree86 CVS already; both a new 2D driver and DRM are
needed. You can use my dri-trunk-sid packages, see
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 06:47 ---
This looks the same as the XFree86 bug #271. I've just added a bit to it, so you
may want to look at that bug number.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 07:18 ---
Please read all comments before posting. Both of you probably need to replace
the DRM module that comes with the 2.4 kernel with the DRM module from the
patched XFree.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 07:27 ---
The module is the right one. Fredi and me are working on this. It is sure that
the rigth module right place!! But the problem is this:
drmOpenDevice: node name is
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 07:49 ---
Do modprobe radeon and figure out why it fails
When that works you can worry about the X stuff.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 08:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=437)
-- (http://bugs.xfree86.org/attachment.cgi?id=437action=view)
The kernel patch for 2.4.22-pre8
The kernel patch for 2.4.22-pre8
--
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 08:08 ---
I rediffed the kernel patch against vanilla 2.4.22-pre8. I looked at the
agpgart changes from 2.4.18 to 2.4.22-pre8 and adapted the patch accordingly
(hopefully). this
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 11:47 ---
This makes sense; the chip can apparently be busy for more than 10 milliseconds,
and a reset may actually make things worse. I don't think raising the default
timeout
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 13:43 ---
First of all, thanks to everyone working on this code - my IGP320M based
laptop now has accelerated 3D.
At least, some of the time. Other times it kernel panics.
After
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 14:41 ---
I've been watching this ever since I opened it. It's at the point where I'm
ready to try it out. Is there a patch for the 2.5 kernels? I'm running 2.5.69
now in order to
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 18:45 ---
Given the 2.4 code, which is now on my todo list the 2.5 code shouldn't be hard.
Might be worth asking Dave Jones
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 18:55 ---
Alan, please hold off releasing this in any kernels until everything has been
properly integrated in the DRI tree.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-29-07 19:59 ---
I already ported the agpgart driver to 2.5.73. It seems to work. I can post it if it
might be helpful, probably it builds perfectly on 2.6.0-pre2 as well (haven't tested
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 01:58 ---
Note that the radeon driver has all the problems listed here in this bug too.
It is NOT just the r128 driver. Although it appears radeon is a sub-
module, needing r128.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 07:38 ---
radeon and r128 are basically independent drivers. The corresponding radeon
driver option is called CPusecTimeout.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 10:35 ---
Neither the patch for the 2.4.18 kernel or the patch for the 2.4.22-pre8 are
working on my box. I didn't forget to select CONFIG_AGP_ATI and I am loading the
drm module
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 10:42 ---
Lots of people want working AGP. I don't see why it needs to wait ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 10:44 ---
Matthieu: Does it work for you if you do
modprobe agpgart agp_try_unsupported=1
?
If so, all we need to do to get it working for you without trouble is adding
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 11:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=439)
-- (http://bugs.xfree86.org/attachment.cgi?id=439action=view)
IGP 345M Kernel Patch for 2.4.21
This patch detects the IGP 345M with PCI ID
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-30-07 11:17 ---
Sorry Alan, I mean the DRM part.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
1 - 100 of 15458 matches
Mail list logo
