Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

2014-02-09 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:23:51 + Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: Here's my changes to the TDA998x driver to add support for the component helper. The TDA998x driver retains support for the old way so that drivers can be transitioned. For any one DRM card the

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

2014-02-09 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:22:19AM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:23:51 + Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: Here's my changes to the TDA998x driver to add support for the component helper. The TDA998x driver retains support for the old way

[PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

2014-02-07 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
This patch series tries to simplify the code of simple devices in case they are part of componentised subsystems, are declared in a DT, and are not using the component bin/unbind functions. Jean-Francois Moine (2): drivers/base: permit base components to omit the bind/unbind ops drivers/base:

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

2014-02-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: This patch series tries to simplify the code of simple devices in case they are part of componentised subsystems, are declared in a DT, and are not using the component bin/unbind functions. I wonder - I said earlier today

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

2014-02-07 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:33:26 + Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: This patch series tries to simplify the code of simple devices in case they are part of componentised subsystems, are declared in a

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

2014-02-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:42:04PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:33:26 + Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: This patch series tries to simplify the code of simple devices

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

2014-02-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: This patch series tries to simplify the code of simple devices in case they are part of componentised subsystems, are declared in a DT, and are not using the component bin/unbind functions. Here's my changes to the TDA998x

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

2014-02-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 06:59:11PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: Sorry. Deferred probe does work, it's been tested with imx-drm, not only from the master component but also the sub-components. There's no problem here. Here's the proof that it also works with the Cubox, and armada