Hello,
w.r.t to my last mail I have following modification in my
proposal .
1. I have looked into *how drizzle replication works* and got the following
information:
For DML we have GPB based 'transaction.proto' which is then converted to
it's class file which solves the low-level
kuldeep porwal 2591kuld...@gmail.com writes:
*2. To Replicate from MySQL to Drizzle (Gsoc Idea): *
This process is quiet simple. We read the MySQL row based binlog from the
publisher (master), then we *form* the new Transaction Message using
a slightly modified version of 'transaction.proto'
Hello Sir,
we just need to parse MySQL binlog and convert into drizzle
transaction.proto, we won't have to change it at all.
Yeah I was trying to convey the same thing but in a different manner. As I
mentioned
1. As MySQL binlogs are row based, we need to change or introduce new
Krishna Tiwari kri1...@gmail.com writes:
I am a M.Tech (Information Technology) student from NIT Durgapur
backed with B.Tech in Computer Science and Engineering.
I would like to work with Drizzle this year as of my interest to
database and programming . I have done several
Hi guys,
I've sync'd up the OpenSUSE builder and Jenkins master with ntpdate.
Libdrizzle builders were failing due to the clocks being out-of-sync.
In future I think we should have an ntpdate service running on the
master and slaves because the master seems to leak time quite a bit
(this
kuldeep porwal 2591kuld...@gmail.com writes:
If in future if we find some DDL inconsistency or any other issue that
*may* require changing transaction.proto then we should modify it and keep
that under different version. As this will obviously help in entirely
independent working of our module
Hi Stu, Kuldeep
Possibly a separate task, but have you guys considered supporting the Galera
replication system for Drizzle?
It may even be possible to have mixed Drizzle and MariaDB in a cluster.
Async repl, even the best possible implementation, still leaves write-scaling
and
On 22/04/13 01:28, Stewart Smith wrote:
kuldeep porwal 2591kuld...@gmail.com writes:
If in future if we find some DDL inconsistency or any other issue that
*may* require changing transaction.proto then we should modify it and keep
that under different version. As this will obviously help in
8 matches
Mail list logo
