Hi,
I have a collection which has X documents in it. Up until now, it had
default read access to anonymous users, but now I want to change it to one
of our groups.
However, when changing this, in the admin panel, I see a note telling that
it won't be changed retroactively, instead it will apply
Yes, we describe this in the FAQ:
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/TechnicalFaq#TechnicalFaq-Ichangedaccessrestrictionsonacollection,butrestrictionsdidn'tchangeonitsitems
Regards,
~~helix84
Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette
Thanks helix84, I just tried using the SQL way and it worked perfectly.
Regards.
2014-11-14 14:22 GMT+00:00 helix84 heli...@centrum.sk:
Yes, we describe this in the FAQ:
I’m trying to run some queries to see the Policy to Bitstream relations but I’m
having a difficult time tracking down the table(s) that store this. Could
someone point me in the right direction?
DSpace Version: 4.2
PostgreSQL Version: 9.0.14
Thanks,
Micah
Don't forget to update your discovery index (using the -f flag).
Regards,
~~helix84
Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
--
Comprehensive
Take a look at the schema:
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC4x/Storage+Layer#StorageLayer-RDBMS/DatabaseStructure
Regards,
~~helix84
Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
Thanks Helix, that's exactly what I needed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:59 AM, helix84 heli...@centrum.sk wrote:
Take a look at the schema:
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC4x/Storage+Layer#StorageLayer-RDBMS/DatabaseStructure
Regards,
~~helix84
Compulsory
Hi All,
I've been reading up on the various configurations that you can run DSpace
and the handle service in, and I was wondering if people would be willing
to share their experiences with non traditional set ups.
So, the out-of-the-box traditional setup, that I'm guessing 99% of us use
is to
Hello,
I am running into an issue with date
range grouping in my repository. I think I have an idea what's at
the root of it (which I will describe below), but I am unsure if there
is a real fix that allows preservation of the intent behind the configuration.
In my repository (DSpace 4.1, XMLUI;
As discussed on #dspace, one important thing to keep in mind is that
DSpace does Handles backwards: it supplies a class for the Handle
server to load, which queries DSpace's database for Handle resolution.
I believe that what was envisioned by CNRI as typical would be for
things to work the other
Hi,
I've seen documentation regarding Embargo here
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC3x/Embargo and even it's quite
useful, my aim is to temporarily withdraw/make private items, based on a
date.
I see that these modifications would change the submission process asking
for a date to lift
Yes, after enabling webui.submission.restrictstep.enableAdvancedForm,
you can create new resourcepolicies with a start and end date from the
Edit item / Authorizations page.
Regards,
~~helix84
Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette
Thank you guys. I'll give it a try and answer if I find some trouble.
Regards.
2014-11-14 20:18 GMT+00:00 helix84 heli...@centrum.sk:
Yes, after enabling webui.submission.restrictstep.enableAdvancedForm,
you can create new resourcepolicies with a start and end date from the
Edit item /
Peter,
The way that the Handle service is designed in general, your always going
to need a separate Handle Service for all the handles under one or more
prefixes.
For an organization, this could be a standalone service that maintains
mappings for prefixes (and subpaths in suffixes) it assigns to
14 matches
Mail list logo
