to decide if you want to pay the premium and
be an early-adopter, so to speak.
--
Nate Duehr
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
On 7/18/2010 1:53 PM, J. Moen wrote:
The other Las Vegas repeater is listed as N7ARR.
http://www.dstarusers.org/viewrepeater.php?system=N7ARR
http://www.dstarusers.org/viewrepeater.php?system=N7ARR shows only 2
callsigns on its Last Heard report for the last 14 days, but that page
also
On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:02 AM, Nate Duehr wrote:
All it takes to grow D-STAR (or any other new mode in any particular area) is
time and money... D-STAR has flourished in some areas due to massive influxes
of taxpayer dollars in the form of government grants... some local, some
Federal
packages should be the order
of the day... and has been since 1996...
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On 6/2/2010 3:41 AM, J. Moen wrote:
Nate WY0X wrote: The guy asked if you could run D-STAR Gateways on
wimpy computers.
No, N9HSM's question was simply I got a question How [far] can you be
be from the Dstar repeater before you drop out? or How close the Dstar
has to be before you can get
On 6/2/2010 5:39 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
You've been a part of this same D-STAR Signal Coverage conversation
many times and the answer is always the same, time after time. And you
don't seem to see where even classic BER calculations have significant
issues defining the quality of the signal
On 6/2/2010 11:30 AM, Gary Pearce KN4AQ wrote:
Hi, Pete (and the group),
Is the 8th position ID character included in call sign routing to
individuals? If I have KN4AQ and KN4AQ^^A both registered (which I do,
with
^ meaning the space character), are they treated totally separately?
For
On 6/3/2010 5:52 PM, John Hays wrote:
The company claims 20% BER to loss of usable signal on AMBE chips.
Yeah, they couched it. (I've seen that spec too.)
That's not the drop-out point, that's usable... you can't build a
scale off of that as a known starting point. Usable could mean a lot
of beans in the real world.
But there was no pissing match here.
Let's hear your thoughts on the topic. Give us the answer. I like your style,
boss. You have answers. Fire 'em up. Send 'em to the list.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
, but worth a mention...
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
published ones from DVSI.
Unfortunately I don't have nor need one of those Service Monitors at that
price. A local lab was trying to acquire one last year. I'll have to check
and see if they ever received it.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Nate Duehr n...@natetech.com
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, May 27, 2010 12:41 am
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Quick Check of Repeater Frequency
On May 26, 2010, at 11:16 AM,
kb...@aol.com
wrote:
W3EOC
W3EOC
CHESTER
temperature (I hit that one once) and
low/high voltages.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
the tester on the battery
that tests the whole system under load. You may just be seeing a battery
that's headed south, too. (If we're working off the What changed? theory.
What's the voltage read when the engine is off?)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
On 5/25/2010 11:22 AM, kb...@aol.com wrote:
Is there a quick way to verify the input frequency of a D-STAR Repeater?
Ask the owner? :-)
Nate WY0X
On 5/25/2010 12:53 AM, J. Moen wrote:
Thanks for making my point -- the D-STAR part is the easy part, and if
you go non-ICOM, it's nearly free. The hard, and expensive work, is
the traditional repeater part of it, which you have outlined very well.
Yeah, I was just supporting your point with
On 5/24/2010 11:19 AM, J. Moen wrote:
Yes, the simplest part of setting up a new D-STAR compatible repeater
is the D-STAR part. The real work is the traditional stuff -- site,
analog radios, duplexers, antennas etc.
That would be ANY repeater, actually. ;-)
Why do hams think the radio part
is the answer to TRBO on the commercial side, but I don't see *easy*
interfaces happening to D-STAR anytime soon, unless that's some super-duper
developer's hot button and they want to spend oodles and oodles of time
figuring it out.
We'll see...
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
Very well put, Ed. I agree with your sentiments about open vs. closed
and how it can be applied to different pieces of D-STAR differently, and
that was the whole point of my reply and questions.
Comparing D-STAR to iPhone is somewhat an Apples-to-Oranges (pun
intended? - GRIN!) comparison
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren't open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where can one find information on them?
Did they publish
On 5/17/2010 1:22 PM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Nope, they aren't readily available for you to read. Did you see that
written anywhere in what I said? Did you see me publish a URL to it?
That's all I asked. Thank you for confirming that the answer is no, and
that D-STAR development is as
On 5/17/2010 1:51 PM, John Hays wrote:
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren’t open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where can one
if the system is performing up to snuff by just doing
the link margin math...
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
Please TRIM your replies or set your email program not to include the original
message in reply unless needed for clarity. ThanksYahoo! Groups
. Test with multiple manufacturer's
rigs before committing taxpayer monies. Seriously.
Good luck with it. If you want to contact me off-list, I can ask and see if
Icom ever got back to the person who was testing for some very large agencies...
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
the registration request had been taken
care of.
Thank you in advance,
Bob N3PUG (The Pug Guy)
Oxford, Ohio
--
Nate Duehr
n...@natetech.com
http://facebook.com/denverpilot
http://twitter.com/denverpilot
Why do you have to e-mail them? They don't let you do it yourself?
Nate WY0X
On May 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Bob N3PUG wrote:
Below is the email that I did receive this past Sunday after registering the
N3PUG A for the Dvap. When I try to use it with the A I get a (Receive
Only) message.
! The collection tends to grow... instead of getting smaller over the
years... not quite ready to be documented on that TV show Hoarders yet, but
starting to feel the space/storage bulge! I've seen worse, though!
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
over in Oshkosh, WI later on in the summer, and Seattle in the fall...
Wanna meet up at the Boeing or Telecom museums? I gotta go see those! ;-) Heh
heh.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
http://facebook.com/denverpilot
http://twitter.com/denverpilot
On 5/4/2010 12:44 PM, Francis Miele wrote:
You can't blame the league. As I understand it, it is up to the
repeater coordinating bodies in each state to supply the info to the
league, If the repeaters are not coordinated, they probably don't get
listed.
Fran, W1FJM
I haven't been the
On 5/4/2010 2:32 PM, J. Moen wrote:
It would make sense for ARRL to scrape off the info from
http://www.dstarusers.org/repeaters.php
http://www.dstarusers.org/repeaters.php and add that to their
directories with a footnote about the source. That would be providing
some more leadership, too.
On 5/4/2010 7:55 PM, John Hays wrote:
I totally agree that coordinators need to get their act together and
cleanup paper repeaters and even make highest and best use decisions
for pairs (open and occupied is higher use than closed and quiet
Coordinators are NOT allowed to make this decision,
On 5/5/2010 7:07 AM, Jay Maynard wrote:
In the end, coordination is not a technical job. It's a political one.
Actually if the FCC deems that you didn't do the technical side of
coordination right, and testifies to such during a lawsuit, you might
find yourself on the wrong side of a
On 5/5/2010 3:34 PM, Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM wrote:
Let me state this and asked if this is true as your statement:
My Motorola GM300 is digital capable.
My ACER Monitor is digital capable.
My Motorola MTS2000 is digital capable.
MY ICOM is Digital capable when it has the GMSK modem installed.
On 5/5/2010 6:10 AM, rOn wrote:
I am new to DSTAR and need some enlightenment.
Other than temporary EMCOMM ops why would anyone want to
connect DSTAR to the internet?
I need facts not attacks.
rOn
Hi Ron,
The only reason at the end of the day is to transmit voice or data to
another D-STAR
record an
off-air digital signal and then play it back, so you add attenuation and
reverse-engineer any type of digital repeater, but expect to be in the $40K
range for them, list. Probably $20-$25K real-world, pricing. Not something
we're going to see too many hams doing, I suspect.
--
Nate
On Apr 20, 2010, at 6:59 PM, ErnestK wrote:
You can use a dual band antenna with a dipelxer and duplexers on each band
but there are trade-offs. When we first put up W6DHS, we were using a dual
band Comet 11dbi on 2 meters. We replaced the two meter side with a DB
Products dipole array
users too much credit. LOL! :-)
The owner put an analog repeater on the original UHF pair, got another UHF pair
for the digital and segregated them. Heh.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:50 PM, bruce mallon wrote:
ANY digital on simplex is going to start a cat fight
S... don't let the APRS or other Packet guys know that, okay? :-)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On 4/9/2010 8:48 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Nate,
Please get your fact straights before spreading FUD.
FUD means Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt, none of which I am spreading.
D-PLUS was created before the DVDongle. D-PLUS is NOT REQUIRED for a
D-STAR repeater, or one that is connected to the
to the interloper and tell them what's
happening.
Trying to treat D-STAR like it wasn't source-routed and adding software to make
it act like an analog system, is what got us to this so-called problem in the
first place, not the other way around.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
...
:-)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
, and someone
popped for a helicopter flight... and he kindly fixed whatever he could for
the different groups with outages while he was there...)
http://www.rmham.org/gallery2/v/thorflyin/?g2_GALLERYSID=5b4d5ca730810adecbe62448cefc54f5
- for photos.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On Apr 7, 2010, at 12:11 AM, Nate Duehr wrote:
However to separate Gateways
Dumb fingers. That should have read: two separate Gateways...
--
Nate Duehr
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
, or a mixture of D-STAR and other digital/narrowband modes. Check
with your local area frequency coordinators...
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On 4/7/2010 9:51 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Nate,
A number of frequency coordinators have come up with new pairs for
D-STAR which utilize portions of the band historically used as simplex.
Didn't know that. Seems kinda silly. Being a member of the Frequency
Coordination Committee here and
On 4/7/2010 4:40 PM, Nicholas wrote:
I may be asking a question that has already been answered. What is the
difference between Linking (UR: KJ4MMCCL) and Source Routing (UR:
/KJ4OXTC)? This is something I have yet to figure out.
Thank you and 73s,
Nick KF4SEK
Cocoa, FL
Quite a bit.
On 4/6/2010 5:10 PM, Catrina White wrote:
I am frequently using a repeater where there is NO ACTIVITY when I
turn on the radio, listen for a few minutes, put on my reading
glasses to see if anything is scrolling on the bottom of my IC
91ad, have it turned to high pwer, and use
that it was there. It helps folks figure out where the
coverage pattern really covers too, as they travel around the area.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On Apr 4, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
and the audio is much better than FM equivalents of IRLP and EchoLink.
Ed WA4YIH
Not technically possible unless the repeaters are interfaced incorrectly.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NXDN for more details.
It blows D-STAR away, feature and functionality-wise, and is 100% incompatible
with D-STAR radios, and infrastructure.
It can only be very *loosely* said it's based upon D-STAR at best.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
information. Rumors indicate
that CI-V is a part of the *repeater* programming, and one German ham wrote
Open Source software to read/write that data also.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
Please TRIM your replies or set your email program not to include
the callsigns in DV
mode in normal operation -- unless they've changed the software and I haven't
upgraded...
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On 3/15/2010 2:41 PM, Marlin wrote:
I just upgraded my IC-2200H to a IC-2820H. I using the ICOM software
to program it. I programmed in a memory channel with my repeater info
(my call, ur, rpt 1, rpt2, etc), but when I try to transmit, the
IC-2820 display literally reads OFF and I can't
On 3/15/2010 3:55 PM, Barry Wilson wrote:
Nate,
We tried programming the IC-880 we received through the NCR Grant and
the software doesn't give the option to set DV mode in its drop down
menu. Have you heard of this problem? Perhaps it will appear after
connecting the Software to the radio.
on the fringe (data header
information is NOT error corrected, voice packets are), or if you have
something programmed incorrectly that the rig is changing after you key up...
etc.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
On 3/10/2010 1:04 PM, kb9khm wrote:
This is where I think the Icom implementation added an unnecessary
feature. D-STAR protocol has its own useable address space in the
callsign fields of the header. In DV mode there is no reason to
assign a callsign an IP address (nor in DD mode either,
for the code. But it does not require publication of
your code changes.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
On 2/28/2010 12:47 PM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
You are correct, and that's what I was referring to . If you stay on a
single repeater, call sign forwarding should be immediate, since the
local software arbitrates the session.
Actually, that should read single gateway. You can bounce between
On 2/26/2010 9:59 PM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Hmmm, sounds like a number of people are unimpressed with your
perception that D-STAR isn't a big deal.
Ahh there you go making up things I didn't say again, Ed. Actually
making up stuff THEY didn't say either. Three people having two ID-1's
On 2/26/2010 12:21 PM, Gary wrote:
I'm not sure this is the forum for this, but shouldn't user
registration data be a bit more redundantly accessible?
Would love to see Icom just drop the whole requirement for registration
altogether in version 4 of their Gateway software if they ever
On 2/26/2010 2:29 PM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
About the only reason why you have to have multiple terminals is if
you are running multiple ID-1s.
Let us know if you ever find anyone who personally owns multiple ID-1's.
LOL! Just sayin'...
Nate WY0X
... and include me also, please?
73 de Dennis KD7CAC
Scottsdale, AZ
On Feb 17, 2010, at 8:14 AM, beamar wrote:
Could someone who is successfully using D Rats on a Macintosh please
e mail me.
Buddy Morgan WB4OMG
bea...@aol.com mailto:beamar%40aol.com
Are you guys familiar with the
back to it, if you have your programming done
correctly.)
But okay - nothing is perfect. Let's have fun even so. :-)
Yup!
--
Nate Duehr
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
is a good one too, if you're on a budget.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
On 2/9/2010 11:24 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
With the popularity of hotspots, cross-band repeaters and other
devices, I got to thinking about the legal classification of these
devices and what it means to their operation. I don't really want to
start a 400 message discussion, but to allow each
On 2/9/2010 11:42 AM, Adrian wrote:
We've already had one ruling by the FCC about D-STAR repeaters and
that didn't go the way that many organizations had hoped. Let's not
force another ruling.
Ed WA4YIH
Hi Ed, What was that ruling, for those of us unaware please?
Adrian,
He's
aprs.fi myself. Better map than most...
--
Nate Duehr
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
On 1/21/2010 6:53 PM, JI1BQW wrote:
A limited number of repeaters? Compared to the US, maybe. There are
57 D-STAR repeaters in the area a bit smaller than the state of
California. It maybe true that we don't mobile much and move between
repeaters.
Wow! Nice coverage!
Nate WY0X
On 1/22/2010 4:03 PM, Neil wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if say, a group of people around the country (or
world even), could put a special call in the UR field and everyone in
that group would have their traffic automatically routed to all the
other members, bit like a multicast I suppose, but
On 1/21/2010 10:34 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Actually the way that routi ng is done in D-STAR is much better than
the routing done in the basic AX.25 protocol. In AX.25, you had to
specify each node along a path. The additional protocol stacks like
KA-Node and others act a little more like
. Neither do Android or many other modern devices.
Sorry your Blackberry's not up to speed. ;-) ;-) ;-)
--
Nate Duehr
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
You forgot to note, they're pre-stored messages that go out on each
transmission and show on the SCREEN of the far-end receiving radio.
They give you a few so you can change the message easily without having to
reprogram it, so you can have multiple default messages.
Nate WY0X
On Jan 19,
.
The touchy feely niceness of the words, isn't worth the headache they can
cause you in court later on. Don't do it.
--
Nate Duehr
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
On 1/20/2010 3:13 PM, Earl Needham wrote:
Are all the D Star repeaters open?
You'd have to ask every repeater owner. :-P
Are all analog systems open? How do you know?
The ARRL Repeater Directory? How do they know?
They ask the local frequency coordinators to ask the owners.
:-)
Not
On 1/20/2010 4:16 PM, Catrina White wrote:
OOPS!! forgot to ask one more thing.. Why when you imput someone's
call sign in the Ur call sign do you need to put 3 empty spaces? what
happens if you dont imput that? does that mean it wont work?
No. You only need spaces if there's a character in
On 1/20/2010 5:10 PM, ki4umx wrote:
I went to the D-Star calculator. plugged in Connie's Call (KB0ZSG) and
it gave me:
Programming for talking to KB0ZSG
YOUR:: KB0ZSG**
RPT1: KR4AIK*C
RPT2: KR4AIK*G
* represents a space
Please note Hank...
Unless something has changed in her local area,
their perrogative, but it takes away
frustration at learning and replaces it with uninformed users... I don't
personally like that trade-off, but I do understand the sentiment Let's just
make this easy for everyone. It's their call.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
http://facebook.com
have is their callsign... assuming they have also learned how to
hit the RS-CS button and reply...
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
http://facebook.com/denverpilot
http://twitter.com/denverpilot
Please TRIM your replies or set your email program
On 1/18/2010 2:08 AM, J. Moen wrote:
Imagine a USB Dongle with a 10 milliwatt FM transceiver built into
it. It plugs into your PC that runs dongle software to allow
connection into the D-Star network of repeaters and reflectors.
D-Star radios, most likely HTs, that are nearby, can use this
Inline comments and questions for you Ed.
On 1/19/2010 11:37 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
We tried to have the stack in Icom's cabinet up and working (what
sells radios better than hams with their own radios showing off the
technology?!) for the ARRL Rocky Mtn Region Convention the last time
it
aprs.fi 's mapping functionality, for another good place to watch
your DPRS/APRS data. Still seems like many people aren't aware of it. Way
better looking map than just about anything other than sucking the data into
Google Earth itself.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
http://facebook.com
Posted this to another list.
A smart comedian who helps keep it all in perspective...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOtEQB-9tvk
:-)
Happy New Year, all...
D-STAR is fine... carry on.
Nate WY0X
On Jan 6, 2010, at 7:13 AM, bosshardss wrote:
I wonder if we just look at DSTAR without
. QST began running regular articles about it in '49.
Hams were about 17 years behind the times back then, and continue that
tradition, eh Gary? ;-)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
might
not be on the mailing list) so he could look at his system, and
before I'd heard back I then saw the announcement that the Admin
timesync push was being done.
Kent, check the archives of the list for more info on the
timeline of how it all happened.
Thanks all,
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n
! :-) Thanks for going up there.
73,
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
CC: DSTAR_DIGITAL list in case folks were trying to call Denver D-STAR
friends/associates.
BCC: John and Mike
-linear style cheap Amateur grade vertical antenna at
high repeater sites... again, need more info about Height Above Average
Terrain, etc... to be able to speak to that.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
twitter.com/denverpilot
of the protocol, as implemented... and compared to others
attempting similar end-results.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
Please TRIM your replies or set your email program not to include the original
message in reply unless needed for clarity
telecom protocol
best practices.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:23 +, Jonathan Naylor
naylo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Nate
You're wrong about the callsigns in the header not having FEC,
they are. In fact they're probably better protected than the AMBE
data if you equate
be easy. Plenty of other ways
even if not done with BIND.
Getting the politics done to get Icom to change it? I have no
dog in that fight.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:40 -0400, Fran Miele
f...@miele-family.com wrote:
I frequently talk with my son in Dallas
to a number of people. Send the command, then
switch back to CQCQCQ and get Not currently linked after
transmission #2. This means D-Plus thought you sent the original
command over again, and didn't see CQCQCQ. Sadly, this is
HIGHLY confusing for users.)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
it. It is. Very brittle. There are plenty of protocols
that do work in heinous amounts of physical layer noise...
D-STAR's not one of them.
That's not a bad/good judgment against D-STAR, it just is...
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:32 +, Jonathan Naylor
naylo...@yahoo.com
This is correct from my experience, and it makes sense from a systems
design standpoint, also. Read on.
Starting with an additional data point/example, if you remove the RPT2
route to the Gateway from your radio, you won't receive a confirmation
transmission from the Gateway, and thus...
Anyone tried it with Snow Leopard running in 64-bit mode
natively?
(Hold down 6+4 during boot on supported hardware, which is only
the latest machines with the correct processors...)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:42 +, ** N8NOE ** n8...@arrl.net
wrote
to make deals in the past. Can't speak for
them, though. Give Icom America a ring on the phone.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
in the grand scheme of tech support... but some
people get all whiny about it. Don't expect to fire up a GW in a few
hours and have it 100% working... it'll take a little bit of time.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
:
The D_STAR_Open_Source group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/D_STAR_Open_Source/
73
--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, Nate Duehr n...@... wrote:
Open is such a badly misused term these days.
Where's the source code available from, and who controls it, under
what license?
Nate
software(dextra_reflect), all of that at
http://dstardextra.sourceforge.net/ under GPL,
while other groups keep giving you the BINARY stuff to run.
73
The D_STAR_Open_Source group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/D_STAR_Open_Source/
Nate Duehr
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com/denverpilot
, 70cm and 1.2 GHz bands are handled.
Modules C, B and A.
We'd like to thank the D STAR Gateway/repeater owners that
participated in the tests.
Thanks a million.
73
The D_STAR_Open_Source group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/D_STAR_Open_Source
Nate Duehr
n...@natetech.com
facebook.com
http://dstarusers.org/rdsu.html
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
favorite quote from the guys on the Uncontrolled Airspace
Podcast can be modified a bit for you:
Remember, time spent flying [or skydiving] is not subtracted
from your lifespan. Go fly! :-)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:24 +, boeing377
boeing...@gmail.com
1 - 100 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
