[dwm] nanox

2009-05-19 Thread pancake
I have been looking a bit for an alternative for X11, and I found nano-X quite interesting, but it is currently an abandoned project. 8000 LOCs, there's an abstraction library to wrap libX11 and there's support for some many IO devices (tty, gpm, ..) It runs directly writing on fb0, but it

Re: [dwm] nanox

2009-05-19 Thread Jacob Todd
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:08:07PM +0200, pancake wrote: Seems interesting, but instead of reinventing the wheel, why don't we just clean up X.org and submit patches back upstream? Rewriting/implementing X.org seems li ke more work than it's worth, but cleaning up Xorg would be better for

Re: [dwm] nanox

2009-05-19 Thread carmen
On Tue May 19, 2009 at 08:39:56PM -0400, Jacob Todd wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:08:07PM +0200, pancake wrote: Seems interesting, but instead of reinventing the wheel, why don't we just clean up X.org and submit patches back upstream? Rewriting/implementing X.org seems li ke