I think that's a sensible proposal, let's do it.
For those who are subscribed already, there won't be a difference. The
new ones will subscribe to hackers. We will keep dwm@ and wmii@
working, but direct it to hack...@.
Kind regards,
Anselm
2009/5/20 markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de:
Ok, I meant the following:
Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who
are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could just stay on
dwm@ resp. w...@. That should be technically possible.
Kind
Hi,
2009/5/20 Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/09, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who
are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically
On (20/05/09 10:04), Anselm R Garbe wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org, wmii mail list w...@suckless.org
From: Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Ok, I meant
2009/5/20 Premysl Hruby dfe...@gmail.com:
On (20/05/09 10:04), Anselm R Garbe wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org, wmii mail list w...@suckless.org
From: Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail
2009/5/20 Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/09, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who
are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could
2009/5/20 yy yiyu@gmail.com:
2009/5/20 Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/09, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who
are only interested in
20, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Premysl Hruby dfe...@gmail.com wrote:
On (20/05/09 11:34), yy wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: yy yiyu@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
2009/5/20
2009/5/20 Uriel urie...@gmail.com:
The problem is not dwm@ and wmii@, the problem is all the other stuff
that is unrelated to either, the only two logical and consistent
options are to either we further split the community into st@ dws@ and
so on, or we merge everything, and I think that
On (20/05/09 11:53), Uriel wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Uriel urie...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
The problem is not dwm@ and wmii@, the problem is all the other stuff
10 matches
Mail list logo
