Re: [DX-CHAT] ProLog2k

2003-01-21 Thread Ron Notarius WN3VAW
Tom, To answer your specific question, there is a ProLog 2K reflector over on the www.qth.net system. Go to http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/prolog2k for more information. Folks, In general, if you're looking for information, try your favorite search engine first, your 2nd favorite 2nd,

[DX-CHAT] re:verticals

2003-01-21 Thread Timothy Varnadore
What can I do (save selling it or making ita tomato hanger - I already have a dummy load!) with a GAP Challenger - I got suckered into it last year at the Miami hamfest because I dont have room for anything but a vertical (especially on 160M) . A few days after I bought it, there was a 160M

Re: [DX-CHAT] Verticals

2003-01-21 Thread Ron Notarius WN3VAW
Actually Larry, this is probably the best way to proceed; since opinions can vary all over the map, you can collate them and let everyone know what the concensus appears to be. But if you want a few public comments... I should mention that years ago, when I worked in a (now defunct) ham store, I

Re: [DX-CHAT] re:verticals

2003-01-21 Thread Gary Danaher
Sorry you're unhappy with the GAP Challenger. Just a couple things though. It is resonant on 80 meters but not 160 meters, so it is no surprise you screamed your lungs out without a response. The problem with most multiband antennas seems to be their lack of efficiency on the lowest band on

[DX-CHAT] GAP Vertical

2003-01-21 Thread Timothy Varnadore
I was just told that I have a GAP VOYAGER - not a Challenger... my bad. SRI! Tim

Fw: Re: [DX-CHAT] [TowerTalk] GAP vs Cushcraft

2003-01-21 Thread n4kg
Here is a copy of a TowerTalk Post I wrote several years ago about Low Band Verticals. Tom N4KG Dual Band Verticals for 80 and 40 meters - de N4KG The HF-2V is full size (or nearly so) on 40M but base loaded on 80M. Base loading is the LEAST efficient method of loading, resulting in a low

Re: [DX-CHAT] re:verticals

2003-01-21 Thread Ron Notarius WN3VAW
I've had my HF6V close to 20 years, and I've never had the caps break. I even have a spare set that someone gave me so that I'd be ready when it happened... never has. I think it's like so many things, they break if they're not installed correctly (ie overtightened) 73, ron wn3vaw "Doc? You

RE: [DX-CHAT] re:verticals

2003-01-21 Thread Dave, AA6YQ
I think its also like so many other things: they don't break if you have replacements handy. 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Notarius WN3VAWSent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 19:39 PMTo: Gary Danaher;

Re: [DX-CHAT] Verticals

2003-01-21 Thread Bob Nielsen
Check out the K7LXC/N0AX report available from www.championradio.com. It gave the best overall score to the R8. I have a Hy-Gain AV-640 (not tested in that report) which is quite similar to the R-8 except for not having traps (and being less expensive). I've been pleased with its performance on

Re: [DX-CHAT] GAP Vertical

2003-01-21 Thread n4kg
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 Timothy Varnadore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was just told that I have a GAP VOYAGER - not a Challenger... my bad. SRI! Tim According to GAP, the VOYAGER covers 160 (90 KHz), and all of 80, 40, and 20 Meters. This antenna is roughly 45 ft tall with a large capacity hat on

RE: [DX-CHAT] re:verticals

2003-01-21 Thread Kelly Jones
I'll be sure to keep my spare set handy also! ;-) I've had my trusty HF6V for 13 (hope that's not an omen) years. It has performed extremely well all things considered. It's been through 3 moves, 2 states several field days. The only thing I've ever had to do to it is clean it up