The same here, but the trojan was JS/Exploit.Agent.AFH George HA5WA
- Original Message - From: Mark Robinson To: k4...@arrl.net ;
wbeye...@cfl.rr.com ; DX List... Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:51 AM Subject:
Re: [DX-CHAT] Question I started looking at the Acom amplifier site
http://www.hfpower.com/
At 02:20 PM 5/18/2009, William Beyer wrote:
Hello Group:
Any one get a photo of the NEW Acom VFD wattmeter? @ Dayton Hamvention.
Jack Hartley
K4WSB / VP2MSB
DXCC Honor Roll
QCWA OOTC
Celebrating 50 years in Ham Radio
3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
http://www.hfpower.com/
At 02:20 PM 5/18/2009, William Beyer wrote:
Hello Group:
Any one get a photo of the NEW Acom VFD wattmeter? @ Dayton Hamvention.
Jack Hartley
K4WSB / VP2MSB
DXCC Honor Roll
QCWA OOTC
Celebrating 50
Any help with locating any QSL route or info for EL2DX
I worked on CW back on 9 July 2004? I have sent QSLs
to K8SJP and receive no answers. Any help
appreciated.
Gary, N5PHT
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
The problem is that then you would have no way to communicate with the pileup as a whole. Newcomers would not know your listening range and the pile would spread farther and farther, causing much problems with other users of the band. Chaos.
73,
Duane, WV2B
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that then you would have no way to communicate with the
pileup as a whole. Newcomers would not know your listening range and
the pile would spread farther and farther, causing much problems with
other users of the band. Chaos.
73,
Duane, WV2B
Assuming the Dx station moves around and answers callers on their own frequency, and does not work more than one caller on a particular frequency- The DX operator has no way to communicate to the pileup as a whole. They will be listening on their own frequency for the Dx to answer them, not
nt: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:01
AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
Assuming the Dx station moves around and answers callers on their own
frequency, and does not work more than one caller on a particular frequency-
The DX operator has no way to communicate to the pileup
At 10:01 03/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the solution to the qrm on the DX frequency? Well, if
someone doesn't know the DX is woking split, or by accident is on
the wrong VFO, or whatever, it would be no problem if ppeople had
the smallest amount of self control. If the offending
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:01
AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
What about intentional
qrmers? Nothing short of direction finding and enforcement by Governments
will have any effect on that, and that simply will not
, March 19, 2006 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
At 10:01 03/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the solution to the qrm on the DX frequency? Well, if
someone doesn't know the DX is woking split, or by accident is on
the wrong VFO, or whatever
.
If I recall, 14195 became the DX frequency because it was a place
where DX stations could TX but that Americans could not (US
privileges started at 14200 for the longest time). Maybe it's time to
revive that tradition and make 14145 the new default DX frequency on
20 SSB. It could have the
z ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:53
AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
What about intentional qrmers?
These guys have now found another way to make it difficult for DX'ers in
a "split" pile-up. They quickly find the station
And how about CW DX going back to 14001-14002?
Bill W5EC
Why not go back to what we had back in the good old days , when the
rare
DX transmitted down around 14115-14125
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only,
@njdxa.org
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Question
Peter,
Hmmm. Not a bad idea, but I'm not so sure how well it would work.
Remember, at the time that US Phone privileges started at 14.200, the
14.1 -
14.2 part of the band was filled with DX Phone. Now, while
At 11:05 03/19/06, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
6. The net or alleged net or sked or alleged sked that always
operates on
or around this frequency and time, thus giving them hypothetical ownership
of the frequency range, who either demand that the DX move, the pile-up
move, or who blunder on
@njdxa.org
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
Ron,
I must add one more as I know this for a fact. Now that we are near the
bottom of this sunspot cycle, some of those Freeband Nuts in Europe and
the US that have all that expensive ham gear can't use it much
: Jerry Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
We're giving the freebanders and intentional QRMers entirely too much
attention and too much publicity. Going back 40+ years I can't remember a
DXpedition that didn't get some
I should know the answer to this but am not sure where to look, so I'll
ask...
This question is in ref to portable identifiers attached to call signs and
pertains to LOTW for additional call signs...such as, for my call when I go
to the Dom Rep to operate in the summer as hi9/k8wk ---or--- as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:12 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] question?
I should know the answer to this but am not sure where to look, so I'll
ask...
This question is in ref to portable identifiers attached to call signs and
pertains to LOTW for additional call
- Allegheny County, WA3SH - Fayette County, and NP2SH -- US
Virgin Islands!
For more information see www.washarc.org
- Original Message -
From: Fred Stevens K2FRD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] question?
At 11:21
Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
Steve,
I'm not sure what you mean by correct method.
Once upon a time YourCall/PortablePrefix was the way everyone did it, be
it a different domestic call area (ie K8WK/3 or F9ABC/8) or DX (ie
K8WK/VP9). (Although in some DX entities, a /p to indicate portable was,
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:57:56PM -0400, Fred Stevens K2FRD wrote:
At 11:21 -0700 05/10/03, John and Mari Minke wrote:
Art RX9TX wrote:
HI9/K8WK, definitely. I think it is one of IARU recommendations.
Europeans and JA's always use only that method.
Actually, I think it would be
He probably meant qsl via Buro 100 percent... Goood luckk W3BJ
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:29:36 -0800 (PST) Gary Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Hi,
I worked CP1UU on cw and he said to qsl via the buro
100. He repeated this a few times. Does that mean to
send a $1 with the card to the Buro ?
ed for all of my Ham programs. I paid $60!!
73
Bill N4NX
- Original Message -
From:
Sherman
Harrison
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:47
AM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Question?
I have all of my logs a friends logs that I am a Qsl Mg'r
fer.My
25 matches
Mail list logo
