[DX-CHAT] VU7LD

2006-12-21 Thread Shelby Summerville
On 12/19, I wrote: I thought I worked VU7LD/VU3ELR, 12/16, 1455Z, 20 SSB. Now, according to the online log, I DID work VU7LD/VU3ELR on 12/16! My apologies to anyone that I may have caused not to work VU7, as I again worked VU7LD/VU3RSB, yesterday. I assure y'all that I'm NOT a DX hog, nor do I

Re: [DX-CHAT] VU7LD

2006-12-21 Thread lmecseri -KE1F
I have not worked VU7LD but my call is in the on-line log. So the operator must have busted someone's call because I have not worked or even called VU7LD on phone. I worked VU7LD, by a previous operation , I have VU7LD confirmed on phone but not on CW. But since CW is no longer a requirement

Re: [DX-CHAT] Can anyone help

2006-12-21 Thread Fred Stevens K2FRD
At 3:05 AM -0800 21/12/06, mike giddings wrote: I have subscribed to the hfradio.org NW7US for several years but recently my email propagation forcasts/alerts stopped arriving. I know from the hfradio.org site that they have had server problems in october but do not know if this is the reason

RE: [DX-CHAT] VU7LD

2006-12-21 Thread LA5HE Ragnar Otterstad
I worked VU7LD, by a previous operation , I have VU7LD confirmed on phone but not on CW. But since CW is no longer a requirement for a HAM license the mode CW is not and will not be popular. I respectfully disagree ! CW is and IMHO probably will still be popular for obvious reasons. Just

RE: [DX-CHAT] VU7LD

2006-12-21 Thread john
At 04:31 PM 12/21/2006, LA5HE Ragnar Otterstad wrote: CW is and IMHO probably will still be popular for obvious reasons. Agree 100% Especially for DXing !!! John K5MO -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database:

RE: [DX-CHAT] VU7LD

2006-12-21 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN
Sorry you feel that way Lou. However, I think you're grossly mistaken. If anything, I think the opposite will occur. Those who continue to operate on CW will do so because they enjoy it, not because they're trying to get their code speeds up to pass a test. It follows then that if it is