Barry wrote:
B The other big factor is the need for so many to work every band-mode
B combination. While I can understand wanting a QWSO on each band and
B mode, is EVERY combination necessary? For example, if you worked them
B on 20 SSB, 40 CW, and 15 RTTY, do you also feel obligated to
as Unassisted.
73
SP5UAF
-Oryginalna wiadomość-
From: Barry
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:46 PM
To: rjai...@gmail.com ; Dx-Chat
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Re: [SPAM]Re: [DX-NEWS] Best Practices for DXpedition
Operating
As a former big gun in a good location, now a little pistol
The leaderboard thing isn't all that bad *IF* the DX wants to allow it and
encourages it. If you're running an operation like HK0NA, 7O6T or T32C --
big, loud and there for a long time, I don't see the harm in it. Some
operations are looking for a new DXpedition record. On the other hand, a
At 07:15 12/12/2012, Gary wrote:
. Vince K5VT - SK would really do something neat. Vince would have
this huge CW pileup going, and send 32. I'd spin the dial up to 32
and call once. Bingo! Reward for actually LISTENING to the DX
op 73, Gary K7ZD
This works great on SSB too. The one
: [DX-CHAT] Re: [SPAM]Re: [DX-NEWS] Best Practices for DXpedition
Operating
Barry, you read my mind.. thanks! Certain DXpedition ops (i.e. Vince
K5VT - SK) would really do something neat. Vince would have this huge CW
pileup going, and send 32. I'd spin the dial up to 32 and call once.
Bingo
Even without the DXpedition resorting to antics such as this, I agree
fully that listening generally yields positive results.
73
Ryan, N2RJ
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Dave Gomberg da...@wcf.com wrote:
At 07:15 12/12/2012, Gary wrote:
. Vince K5VT - SK would really do something neat.
Ron, ZL1AMO did something similar. He had a habit of listening down 1
when sending UP.
Barry W2UP
On 12/12/2012 08:15, Gary wrote:
Barry, you read my mind.. thanks! Certain DXpedition ops (i.e. Vince
K5VT - SK) would really do something neat. Vince would have this huge
CW pileup going,
