You are certainly a strange fish Robert, you say some incredibly
amazingly bizarre things, and then you say some incredibly subtly
correct things, and from time to time you give up some astonishingly
useful knwoledge! I've always thought this. Sometimes you come off
as a complete crackpot and
Shalom,
Jim Davidson wrote:
I would say the shares should represent
an ownership interest in the income potential of the underlying
company.
Not exactly. I would say that a share represents an ownership interest
in the company assets, earnings and management. Although there are
different
The second item of concern for me was that because some people equate TGC
shares with e-gold there is an inherent potential of perceived
inflationary tendencies.
But they do so mistakenly; even in the context of private exchanges I am
not sure how such inflation is possible (see below.)
Imagine
Dear Arik,
Shalom.
I would say the shares should represent
an ownership interest in the income potential of the underlying
company.
Not exactly. I would say that a share represents an ownership interest
in the company assets, earnings and management. Although there are
different powers to shares
Hello Jim,
I was wondering what kept you :o)
In fact I was not speaking out against shares - or didn't mean to - at
least initialy. I was trying to set the stage for what my latter post was
meant to achieve namely warn about *possible* inflationary tendencies of
e-gold derivatives, for lack of a
