Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org
[ 809.824721] WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1908
dev_queue_xmit+0x243/0x4c7()
[ 809.832183] Hardware name: Sun
[ 809.832193] eth16 selects TX queue 98, but real number of TX queues
is
64
[ 809.832203] Modules linked in:
[ 809.832216] Pid: 26440,
Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org
[ 809.824721] WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1908
dev_queue_xmit+0x243/0x4c7()
[ 809.832183] Hardware name: Sun
[ 809.832193] eth16 selects TX queue 98, but real number of TX queues is
64
[ 809.832203] Modules linked in:
[ 809.832216]
Krishna Kumar2/India/i...@ibmin wrote
I guess you are running on a big SMP system? If so,
ixgbe_select_queue() is not limiting the queue_index
based on real_num_tx_queues, and possibly returning
a bad txq from:
if (adapter-flags IXGBE_FLAG_FDIR_HASH_CAPABLE)
e1000-devel华为项目管理工具与模板运用
时间地点：2009年12月25-26日 上海
时间地点：2009年12月30-31日 北京
费用：2800元/人（包括资料费、午餐及上下午茶点等）
课程对象：企事业单位执行层，包括项目总监、部门经理、高级项目经理、项目团队成员等。
课程特点：实战的项目演练+案例分析+案例研讨+实际操作
咨询电话：020-80560638；020-85917945 谢小姐（不需此类信件请复电邮至chinamm...@126.com退信）
I have experienced an issue that I believe lies with the GRO implementation
in IGB 2.1.1.
The problem I see is that when GRO is enabled, TCP connections through the
router are limited to approximately 300-500 kbps. If I disable GRO, I can
get the full expected throughput. Regardless of offload
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 11:20 Thu 10 Dec 2009, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
I am trying to test the patches you submitted (thanks btw) and so
far am not able to reproduce the panic you described. When MTU is at
1500 RCTL.LPE (bit 5) is set to 0 and the HW will not allow
From: Krishna Kumar2 krkum...@in.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:57:26 +0530
Also, I was looking at other providers of select_queue and found:
u16 gfar_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
return skb_get_queue_mapping(skb);
}
How can this be correct
Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 b05...@freescale.com wrote on 12/24/2009 11:34:23
AM:
From: Krishna Kumar2 krkum...@in.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:57:26 +0530
Also, I was looking at other providers of select_queue and found:
u16 gfar_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff
From: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 b05...@freescale.com
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:34:23 +0530
What if I want to maintaing a 1-1 mapping b/w the Rx/Tx queues.
For eg., I want a packet received on queue-1 on eth0 to be forwarded on
to queue-1 on eth1.
That's what the default code does when
-Original Message-
From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:00 PM
To: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
Cc: krkum...@in.ibm.com; ying...@kernel.org;
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; net...@vger.kernel.org;
netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org;
-Original Message-
From: Krishna Kumar2 [mailto:krkum...@in.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:30 PM
To: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
Cc: avoront...@ru.mvista.com; David Miller;
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; ga...@kernel.crashing.org;
net...@vger.kernel.org;
11 matches
Mail list logo
