On 11/28/12 02:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
Forgive me if I'm being too repetitious as I think some of this has
been mentioned in the past.
We (and by we I mean the Ethernet part and driver) can only change the
advertised availability of a
Hello,
we have an X520-SR2 adapter that we are trying to use for passive
monitoring. What we want to do is to use an optical splitter and connect
the output from this splitter to the RX connectors on the X520-SR2 and
leave the TX connectors unconnected.
If we try this we are not able to get a
Hi Folks,
I have two machines A and B. And I have a shared memory system so A
can read/write B's RAM and vice versa. On top of this shared memory
system I plan to develop a Ethernet-like driver running on A and B so
that each can talk to the other using IP/socket API. There will be no
real
tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next.git
master
head: 14a8d4bb5675b5ff854bb2536b0371f3b261136e
commit: 2c1a10196511a2c1af612a59aa1e5385afca0533 [1/7] igbvf: work around i350
erratum
sparse warnings:
+ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c:115:31:
The only EEPROM I know about or can speak to is the one attached to the 82571
and it doesn't set the MaxPayloadSize. That's done by the BIOS.
Todd Fujinaka
Technical Marketing Engineer
LAN Access Division (LAD)
Intel Corporation
todd.fujin...@intel.com
(503) 712-4565
-Original Message-
Thanks, also can you please confirm that the module is the Juniper SKU?
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Paweł Gołaszewski [mailto:bl...@gda.pl]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 10:16 PM
To: Ko, Stephen S
Cc: 'e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] ixgbe with
Hello,
your photoshttp://up.busanilbo.com/upload.htm
--
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
INSIGHTS What's next for parallel hardware, programming and related areas?
Interviews and blogs by thought leaders keep
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Ko, Stephen S wrote:
We may be able to take a look. Could you please double check your
module model? We could not find any data on SP-SM31010-GB (only -GP
came up.)
yep, my fault: GBC Photonics SP-SM31010-GP
Thanks, also can you please confirm that the module is
-Original Message-
From: William Tu [mailto:u9012...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 6:02 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] Ethernet driver on top of shared memory
Hi Folks,
I have two machines A and B. And I have a shared memory
Joe,
Possibly your customer is running a kernel without source code on
a platform whose vendor wouldn't like to fix BIOS issue( Is that a
HP/Dell server ?).
Anyway, to see if is a payload issue or, you could change the
payload size with setpci tool to those devices and set the link
The module's 10GBASE-LR, can you make sure the link partner is also LR and
connected w/ single mode fiber cable?
We are wondering if the other modules worked because they were SR.
-Original Message-
From: Paweł Gołaszewski [mailto:bl...@gda.pl]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Ko, Stephen S wrote:
We may be able to take a look. Could you please double check
your module model? We could not find any data on SP-SM31010-GB
(only -GP came up.)
yep, my fault: GBC Photonics SP-SM31010-GP
Thanks, also can you please confirm that the
12 matches
Mail list logo
