Sorry to hear that you have such issue with card.
Is the issue happen only on one system or on multiple systems?
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: j...@destar.net [mailto:j...@destar.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:54 PM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
Jon,
I am sorry to hear this. But have you tried booting kernel with APIC 'on'?
Thanks.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: j...@destar.net [mailto:j...@destar.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 10:08 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [E1000-devel
Bhanu,
Based on the 82599 datasheet, Permanent MAC address for port 0 belongs to 'lan
core 0 module pointer' ( EEPROM word at offset 0x09) and port1 belongs to 'lan
core1 module pointer'
The pointer to MAC address in the eeprom is depend on eeprom word 0x09 and
0x0A.
For port 0,
1. Run
Chris,
Sorry to hear that you have the issue.
Does the issue appears only when you add a bridge?
Thanks.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Chris Rankin [mailto:ranki...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 4:54 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
let me know output of
#cat /etc/network/interface
#ifconfig -a
Thanks.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Chris Rankin [mailto:ranki...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 3:42 PM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Dave, Tushar N
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [E1000
in /var/log/messages
Once you see tx hang info (via dmesg) send us the whole dmesg log and I go
forward from there.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Björn Stenberg [mailto:bj...@haxx.se]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 12:18 AM
To: Brandeburg, Jesse
Cc: Dave, Tushar N; e1000-devel
kernel
live cd it's worth trying it.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Björn Stenberg [mailto:bj...@haxx.se]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 12:47 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Brandeburg, Jesse
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000: fix Tx hangs by disabling
Sorry to hear that you have this issue.
Can you try pci=nommconf and boot the kernel? See if it makes any difference.
Also, please send following data,
- Whole dmesg log when issue occurs
- lspci -vvv
- ethtool -S ethx
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Mathieu Gagné
[mailto:bj...@haxx.se]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 2:17 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Brandeburg, Jesse
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000: fix Tx hangs by disabling 64-bit DMA
Dave, Tushar N wrote:
At this point I think a bus trace can be very helpful. We
: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 12:15 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Brandeburg, Jesse
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000: fix Tx hangs by disabling 64-bit DMA
Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Sorry for this to taking so long in coming, however I have not been able to
reproduced the issue
Bjorn,
Also I noticed that you are running debian kernel linux-image-2.6.37-1-amd64.
This is an unstable debian kernel. Have you seen the tx hang with latest stable
debian release (Squeeze) which has 2.6.32 kernel?
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Dave, Tushar N [mailto:tushar.n.d
[mailto:bj...@haxx.se]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 2:34 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Brandeburg, Jesse
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000: fix Tx hangs by disabling 64-bit DMA
Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Also I noticed that you are running debian kernel
linux-image
-
From: Björn Stenberg [mailto:bj...@haxx.se]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 1:37 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Brandeburg, Jesse
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000: fix Tx hangs by disabling 64-bit DMA
Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Can you please disable gso? (#ethtool -K
/ignore_64bit_dma
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Björn Stenberg [mailto:bj...@haxx.se]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 5:48 AM
To: Brandeburg, Jesse
Cc: Dave, Tushar N; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000: fix Tx hangs by disabling 64-bit DMA
Brandeburg, Jesse
and confirm cat
/sys/module/e1000/parameters/ignore_64bit_dma is 1 then all dma addresses must
be 4G
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Björn Stenberg [mailto:bj...@haxx.se]
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 12:09 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: Brandeburg, Jesse; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Bjorn,
I was thinking yesterday and thought if you could have sent me the wrong dump
file, may be!
Can you check confirm that is not the case?
I have confirmed that the ignore_64bit_dma is working on my system.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Dave, Tushar N [mailto:tushar.n.d
Andy,
Thanks for your patience. I am looking into this.
(assuming your eth0 device is 80003ES2LAN) Can you provide 'ethtool -e eth0'
output?
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Andy Cress [mailto:andy.cr...@us.kontron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 2:21 PM
To:
: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:23 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: e1000e check_mng_mode issue
Tushar,
Right, my eth0 is 80003ES2LAN.
Attached is the 'ethtool -e eth0' output (eth0.e).
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Dave, Tushar N [mailto:tushar.n.d
Andy,
That's a good point. I am working with our HW engineers to have the answer of
your query.
I will get back to you soon.
Thank you.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Andy Cress [mailto:andy.cr...@us.kontron.com]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 2:30 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N; e1000-devel
LAN configuration.
So what drives those bits? Does the IPMI firmware drive them, or do
they depend on the NIC firmware, or ...?
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Dave, Tushar N [mailto:tushar.n.d...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 4:58 PM
To: Andy Cress; e1000-devel
or not (KCS, ...)?
It all depends on BMC firmware. Driver doesn't have any mechanism to tell if
IPMI lan is enable or disable.
I would suggest to contact your board manufacturer to address this in more
details.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Dave, Tushar N [mailto:tushar.n.d
[mailto:neal.tay...@ca.com]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 4:47 PM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Dave, Tushar N; Brandeburg, Jesse
Cc: Taylor, Neal E; Quach, Minh T
Subject: No usable DMA configuration: 82541GI
I'm working on a system with a pair of 82541GI cards where, on bare metal it
works
Are you running 64 bit kernel? uname -r ?
-Tushar
From: Taylor, Neal E [mailto:neal.tay...@ca.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 7:24 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Brandeburg, Jesse
Cc: Quach, Minh T
Subject: RE: No usable DMA configuration: 82541GI
The only mods I
Thanks for the info. I try repro this in our lab; will send you update.
-Tushar
From: Taylor, Neal E [mailto:neal.tay...@ca.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 3:01 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Quach, Minh T; Brandeburg, Jesse
Subject: RE: No usable DMA
You should post it to xen mailing list.
-Tushar
From: Taylor, Neal E [mailto:neal.tay...@ca.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 2:45 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Quach, Minh T; Brandeburg, Jesse
Subject: RE: No usable DMA configuration: 82541GI
Yesterday I
Anand,
Sorry to hear that you have this issue with card. And yeah, thanks for doing
the debugging and providing the bus trace.
I think we should run the debug driver that prints the HW ring details when
hang occurs. I can provide you a debug driver. You can then install debug
driver and also
Pratyush,
Sorry I got your name reversed.
Are you using in-kernel driver or one from Sourceforge.
Please send me output of ethtool -i ethx.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Pratyush Anand [mailto:pratyush.an...@st.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 8:25 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc
[mailto:pratyush.an...@st.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:21 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: Greg KH; Pratyush Anand; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
net...@vger.kernel.org; Shiraz HASHIM; Deepak SIKRI; Bhavna YADAV;
linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Linux NICS
Subject: Re: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
-
From: Pratyush Anand [mailto:pratyush.an...@st.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:21 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: Greg KH; Pratyush Anand; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
net...@vger.kernel.org; Shiraz HASHIM; Deepak SIKRI; Bhavna YADAV;
linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Linux NICS
Subject
-Original Message-
From: Pratyush Anand [mailto:pratyush.an...@st.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 7:34 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: Greg KH; Pratyush Anand; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
net...@vger.kernel.org; Shiraz HASHIM; Deepak SIKRI; Bhavna YADAV; linux-
p...@vger.kernel.org
My bad. If it was permission issue the error message would be Operation not
permitted.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Dave, Tushar N [mailto:tushar.n.d...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 12:45 PM
To: Vishal Ahuja; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel
Naresh,
What NIC are you using?
Please send dmesg log from the system having issue. Also, send me 'lspci -vvv'
output.
Thanks.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Naresh Bhat [mailto:nareshgb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 12:46 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
I sent you a patch yesterday , however looks like it was not delivered.
-Original Message-
From: Dave, Tushar N
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:36 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N; nareshgb...@gmail.com
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH] e1000: test/debug patch for things
Sorry to hear that you have this issue. Recently, we have seen tx hang issue
with 82571 because of the driver bug due to dma burst enabled.
A quick check would be to try the test driver that I have attached.
Please untar the driver src, compile it and insert the module. See if issue
occur!
-Original Message-
From: Holger Eitzenberger [mailto:hol...@eitzenberger.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 3:05 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Unit Hang kernel 2.6.32.y + driver
v1.9.5
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:43
-Original Message-
From: Holger Eitzenberger [mailto:hol...@eitzenberger.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:42 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Unit Hang kernel 2.6.32.y + driver
v1.9.5
It occurs in bursts
Correcting the rx_hook (struct netpoll) method as defined in
include/linux/netpoll.h
Signed-off-by: Tushar Dave tushar.n.d...@intel.com
---
drivers/net/kgdboe.c | 10 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/kgdboe.c b/drivers/net/kgdboe.c
index
I am not seeing the issue. I am able to connect to target without any errors.
Do you able to connect to target?
-Original Message-
From: Naresh Bhat [mailto:nareshgb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:04 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
Okay. I see what you mean. I will execute the same commands tomorrow and get
back to you.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Naresh Bhat [mailto:nareshgb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:04 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH
0x0 0
es 0x0 0
fs 0x0 0
gs 0x0 0
(gdb)
- Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Naresh Bhat [mailto:nareshgb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 4:49 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
$
==
=
On 2/23/12, Dave, Tushar N tushar.n.d...@intel.com wrote:
Naresh,
Thanks for your patience and working with me.
I have done testing with 82540EM and 82546GB Intel Ethernet gigabit
controller and found no issues.
To be sure,
I have
GLCI is SerDes-based MAC-PHY interface.
AFAIK, FIFO overflow occurrence represents that the rate at which data being
written into FIFO is faster than the data being read out from FIFO.
FIFO underflow occurrence represents that the rate at which data being read out
from FIFO is faster than data
: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 6:24 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kgdboe patch
Hi Tushar,
Sorry for the delay in reply. I know why you are not able to see
invoking kgdboe.c file. In your configuration file KGDBOE is set as M
(module).
Please, set
I see. However I doubt it's a driver issue. If loading kgdboe with module works
and if built into kernel doesn't!
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Naresh Bhat [mailto:nareshgb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:52 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
-Original Message-
From: Nishit Shah [mailto:nishit.s...@elitecore.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 12:27 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] Problem with Intel 82573l bi-directional throughput
Hi,
We are testing 82573l bi-directional throughput on linux
Holger,
There is no trace attached. It's only lspci output and driver info says you're
using 1.6.3 version of e1000e driver.
I recall we worked on issue with subject [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Unit Hang
kernel 2.6.32.y + driver v1.9.5 about a month back. I'd sent you e1000e test
driver based on
-Original Message-
From: Holger Eitzenberger [mailto:hol...@eitzenberger.org]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 12:53 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [e1000e] 82583V transmit queue 0 timed out
There is no trace attached. It's only lspci
Ben,
Would you please set current message level via ethtool to hw + tx_done +
rx_status; then driver will log tx desc and rx desc data into dmesg when hang
occurs. That will show us what's going on.
Please send me the dmesg log after the tx hang.
Thanks.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
When you say transmit hung, are you getting Tx hang message in dmesg. Or TX
timeout from netdev?
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:34 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel list
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e
I had done some work on this and to me it looks like this can only happen if
driver does not report bytes_compl and pkts_compl stats correctly.
I will experiment more tomorrow.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf
Igor,
I start looking into this.
I will update https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43132
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Igor Smolyar [mailto:xrevol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 12:45 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] possible
I am interested in to see if you have actual test case and more importantly
test data that shows that kernel and device indexes are not synchronized any
more.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Samuel
Jason,
The information you find in e1000e-1.11.3/README is for 82573 adapters (fix for
TX hang issue).
The information you find in README at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/e1000e%20stable/eeprom_fix_82574_or_82583/
is for 82574 and 82583 adapters (fix for packet drop issue).
These
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Joe Jin
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:40 AM
To: Joe Jin
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware
-Original Message-
From: Dave, Tushar N
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:02 PM
To: Joe Jin
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; Dave, Tushar N
Subject: RE: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 5:35 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/11/12 03:02, Dave, Tushar N
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:29 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/11/12 11:22, Dave, Tushar N
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:03 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/11/12 12:05, Dave, Tushar N
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:39 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/11/12 15:37, Dave, Tushar N
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:03 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/11/12 12:05, Dave, Tushar N
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Peng [mailto:peng...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:50 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Folks, I've been getting some strange error messages in my home server /
router that
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 7:58 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/12/12 10:52, Dave, Tushar N
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:13 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/12/12 11:07, Dave, Tushar N
On 07/12/12 13:57, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:13 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 12:11 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/12/12 14:41, Dave, Tushar N
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 4:46 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Thanks for sending full dmesg log. I
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:34 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/13/12 12:10, Dave, Tushar N
]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 4:42 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Attached is the dmesg output. Please let me know if this looks right.
There are two instances of the error here:
[361106.726601] e1000e
In that case, you can use our e1000e outbox driver from Sourceforge (which
should have patches mentioned by Flavio).
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Leitner [mailto:f...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 6:39 PM
To: Andrew Peng
Cc: Dave, Tushar N; e1000-devel
-Original Message-
From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 2:46 PM
To: e1000-devel list; netdev
Subject: [E1000-devel] Crash in e1000e, 3.3.8+ (tainted)
We have a somewhat reproducible crash using a 6-port NIC with 3.3.8+
kernel. This kernel is
-Original Message-
From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:21 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel list; netdev; Allan, Bruce W
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Crash in e1000e, 3.3.8+ (tainted)
On 07/24/2012 04:13 PM, Dave, Tushar N wrote
-Original Message-
From: Qiao Xiang [mailto:xiang...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 7:15 PM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] questions about e1000_xmit_frame and
e1000_clean_tx_irq
Hi All,
I am a newbie to the e1000 driver development. I am working on
[mailto:xiang...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 2:34 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] questions about e1000_xmit_frame and
e1000_clean_tx_irq
Hi Tushar,
Thank you very much for your answer. I do have another few follow up questions.
1
-Original Message-
From: Viktor Radnai [mailto:viktor.rad...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:23 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] Intel 82567LM issue
Hi all,
I have a recurring issue with the Intel 82567LM nic in my laptop (a Dell
Precision
-Original Message-
From: Nikolay Popov [mailto:niko...@popoff.net.ua]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 1:29 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Hi, All
It seems that I'm getting same problems with 3.5.2 kernel -
-Original Message-
From: Nikolay Popov [mailto:niko...@popoff.net.ua]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 9:00 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
29.08.2012 6:29, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Have you tried
Andrew,
There is no tx_timeout . So as I motioned in previous email this is a false
hang. If issue persist with latest driver let me know and I look into it.
-Tushar
From: Andrew Peng [mailto:peng...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 11:41 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Kelvie Wong
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:07 PM
To: net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Kelvie Wong
Subject: Intel 82574L hang when sending short ethernet
-Original Message-
From: kel...@gmail.com [mailto:kel...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kelvie Wong
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:17 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Kelvie Wong
Subject: Re: Intel 82574L hang when sending short ethernet
-Original Message-
From: hank peng [mailto:pengxi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 6:19 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] e1000 driver crashed when rebooting system.
My board has 4 82574 network chip, and bond them. Network card driver
version
-Original Message-
From: kel...@gmail.com [mailto:kel...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kelvie Wong
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:46 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Kelvie Wong
Subject: Re: Intel 82574L hang when sending short ethernet
-Original Message-
From: hank peng [mailto:pengxi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:40 PM
To: e1000-devel
Subject: [E1000-devel] 82574L crashed in heavy load test
Kernel version is 2.6.37.1, network driver version is 2.0.0.1. We test its
stability in heavy load test. After
Can you please send 'ifconfig -a' and 'ethtool -e ethx' from all I350-F4 Sgl'
ports.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Angelacos [mailto:nangela...@genericconf.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:10 AM
To: Abodunrin, Akeem G
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Angelacos [mailto:nangela...@genericconf.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:54 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: Abodunrin, Akeem G; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] MAC addresses with igb and I350-F4 Sgl
On 09/26/2012 05:37 PM
-Original Message-
From: `VL [mailto:vl.homu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 11:35 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] e1000 (pci): TX unit hang
Hello everyone,
Under any significant load the driver starts producing detected Tx Unit
hang messages
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Joe Jin
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:25 PM
To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
Subject: 82571EB: Detected
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Denys Fedoryshchenko
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:59 AM
To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny,
Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V;
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:48 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 11/09/12 04:35
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 9:38 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 11/16/12 04:26
-Original Message-
From: akepner [mailto:akep...@riverbed.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 11:40 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] pci probe of 82574 fails
We have seen some instances where the pci probe of a 82574 is failing like
this:
e1000e
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Wilhelmi [mailto:j...@amergint.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 5:10 PM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] packet loss with 82579LM and 82574L
Hello,
I am building a line of WAN emulators using Supermicro X9SCV-Q-0
04, 2013 10:39 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] packet loss with 82579LM and 82574L
Tushar,
I changed the test around so I could use just the 82579LM or the 82574L.
When I run with just the 82574L, everything works fine! At this point
://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/6-and-c200-chipset-specification-update.pdf
-Tushar
From: Joseph Wilhelmi [mailto:j...@amergint.com]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 4:31 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] packet
Jon,
82579 is e1000e driver and not e1000.
Getting to the issue, what is the motherboard? Are you running the latest BIOS?
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Jon Nordby [mailto:j...@sqhead.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 7:35 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
reproduction steps?
Was it ever working before with any good known driver/kernel version?
-Tushar
From: Lars Maschke - Computersysteme Gme [mailto:l...@gmeiner.de]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 11:18 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Subject: e1000e detected hardware unit hang problem
Dear Tushar,
I saw in some
-Original Message-
From: Lars Maschke [mailto:m...@lars-maschke.de]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 3:11 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re-2: e1000e detected hardware unit hang problem
Hello Tushar,
first of all. Thanks for Your quick reply.
That's
lab but couldn't find S1200BLT for reproduction.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Lars Maschke [mailto:m...@lars-maschke.de]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 1:58 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re-4: e1000e detected hardware unit hang problem
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas Parpandet [mailto:n...@1g6.biz]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 5:29 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] autoneg fiber e1000
Hi,
My kernel is 3.2 (same with 2.6.32) ,
I have a Intel Corporation 82545EM Gigabit Ethernet
From: Nicolas Parpandet [mailto:n...@1g6.biz]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:53 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] autoneg fiber e1000
As you can see autoneg is forced on, and my link doesn't come up because
of this.
The other side
-Original Message-
From: bruce_leon...@selinc.com [mailto:bruce_leon...@selinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 1:24 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] IGB device support question
Tushar,
Yes this is system specific. I get multiple types
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
