Re: [E1000-devel] Port showing link down at random times

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 09:26 +1000, Leigh Sharpe wrote: Hi All, I'm having a problem with my e1000 cards intermittently shutting down. This is happening across multiple cards, on multiple systems. I get the following messages in the syslog at the time: Aug 26 22:58:36 ElizaQOS kernel:

Re: [E1000-devel] how to repair correupted EEPROM/NVM?

On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 11:13 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: Brandeburg, Jesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have contacted your laptop vendor and told them about this right? I've tried, but they're currently giving me the whole have you checked the cable runaround. I'll see if I can

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel e1000e: eth0: Detected Tx Unit Hang

On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Soeren Sonnenburg ker...@nn7.de wrote: Dear list, I just recently observed a strange problem with an onboard 82567LF-2 Intel ethernet controller. It completely stopped working and this desktop machine required a powerdown to get it to work again. This

Re: [E1000-devel] LRO botch with 82598EB 2.0.44.14-NAPI

39426, win 382, length 0 -- Jesse Brandeburg This email sent via Evolution, powered by Linux -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration

Re: [E1000-devel] Excessive frame dropping on 82574L

second) because you're not doing a latency sensitive workload Please also provide /proc/interrupts and ethtool -e ethX, and if you are feeling gung-ho, the output of the ethregs utility available at sourceforge (you'll have to build it) in the Register Dump utility section. -- Jesse Brandeburg

Re: [E1000-devel] 82567V-3 PXE boot

e1000e-1.1.2.tar. Did you force the module to be loaded with --preload in the initrd creation? in redhat the mkinitrd has a --preload=e1000e option to force a module to be loaded out of the initrd. Also may need --with=e1000e -- Jesse Brandeburg This email sent via Evolution, powered by Linux

Re: [E1000-devel] Ixgbe and VLAN filtering

. -- Jesse Brandeburg This email sent via Evolution, powered by Linux -- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose

Re: [E1000-devel] [Bugme-new] [Bug 14748] New: e1000e NIC not working after reboot

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Brandeburg, Jesse jesse.brandeb...@intel.com wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Andrew Morton wrote: When I power up my system the NIC is working properly. After every reboot the NIC is not working. I mean the eth0 is created, but neither dhcpcd gets IP nor static

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e-1.1.2 Compile errors with 2.4.37 and gcc 2.95.3

removed netdev, On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Ben Hutchings bhutchi...@solarflare.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 10:58 +0100, Marco Schwarz wrote: Hi, I get the following output when trying to compile e1000e-1.1.2 with Linux Kernel 2.4.37 and gcc 2.95.3 (e1000-8.0.16 compiles fine):

Re: [E1000-devel] New thread: page allocation failure with E1000 (seems to be reproducible)

in the future please copy net...@vger.kernel.org on networking issues. On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jesse, the memory allocation (order:0), while unexpected, are not fatal, and the e1000 driver is written to handle the failures during

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Thrash Dude thrash.d...@gmail.com wrote: Seems to be a rather common issue with the e1000 module. I searched the archives back to 2005. Plenty of reports, no solutions. There are some solutions, one of which is to try loading the driver with TxDescriptorStep=4

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Metal Thrashing Mad thrash.d...@gmail.com wrote: Just read the mail from Nikita, about fixeep-82573-dspd.sh. I didn't see that mail. That script is only for 82573. Running the script returns - No appropriate hardware found for this fixup. Knowing full well

Re: [E1000-devel] recent e100 fixes cause kernel panic?

into the panic trace now, maybe I can figure it out from there. -- Jesse Brandeburg This email sent via Evolution, powered by Linux -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel 2598EB 10-Gigabit AT dropped rx packet

/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired -- Jesse Brandeburg This email sent via Evolution, powered by Linux -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio

Re: [E1000-devel] Missing VLAN Header

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Andreas Grau andreas.g...@ipvs.uni-stuttgart.de wrote: Hi, We are currently experimenting with vlan on a 10GE i82599 nic. Linux 2.6.18 with ixgbe version 2.0.62.4-NAPI is used on top of XEN 3.1.2. For the experiments we are using the following scenario:  

Re: [E1000-devel] carrier detection issues at 10GB on XAUI with ixgbe driver on 2.6.27 x86 board

the alignment status (but still have good lane sync status), and finally 100ms later we lose signal detect on 3 of the 4 lanes. Does the link eventually come up? We may need to get an eeprom dump from the 82599 part you're working on as well. ethtool -e ethX should suffice. -- Jesse Brandeburg

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] e1000e: Intel 82571EB: Don't wait for MNG cycle on unmanaged chips

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Kyle Moffett kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com wrote: The Intel 82571EB chipset can be used in an unmanaged configuration as a fast dual-port Gig-E controller.  Unfortunately a board constructed that way would fail to correctly come up because the driver polls for the

Re: [E1000-devel] NAPI in e1000e

2010/11/1 xiaolin chan...@yeah.net: In e1000 driver, there is ew32(IMC, ~0) in the function of e1000_intr before scheduling adapter-napi. However, there is no such kind operation in e1000e. My question is whether NIC hardware irq is disabled during the NAPI/ksoftirqd processing? yes, it

Re: [E1000-devel] 82754L spontaneous freeze networking woes continue in 2.6.37

On 1/31/2011 4:06 PM, Allan, Bruce W wrote: -Original Message- From: Nix [mailto:n...@esperi.org.uk] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 3:31 PM To: Allan, Bruce W Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82754L spontaneous freeze networking woes continue in

Re: [E1000-devel] Question on net_stats-rx_dropped setting to 0

You have to overrun the fifo on the hardware to see rx_dropped error from hardware. Currently your cpu is fast enough to keep up with the packet load. On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Filo FeFi j11...@yahoo.com wrote: Ah! I've been looking for it in kernel version 2.6.18 which doesn't seem

Re: [E1000-devel] Getting information from Users

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com wrote: Hey devels, I'm updating my bug report with requested information and thought I might as well make a script to automatically pull all the information together. This is awesome, thank you, I think that it needs some

Re: [E1000-devel] non_eop_descs

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Richard Scobie rich...@sauce.co.nz wrote: I have a NAS box set up with bridged interfaces, a couple of which are 82598EB AF. The host boxes direct attached to these are performing more or less identical tasks, but one interface shows no non_eop_descs and the

Re: [E1000-devel] Spam

2011/8/1 CLOSE Dave dave.cl...@us.thalesgroup.com: I've tried asking privately to the owner of this list but have seen no response. Is there some reason why we can't filter this crap? Does anyone manage the list and remove offenders? Hi Dave, yeah, sorry about the spam to this list, but we

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e check_mng_mode issue

On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:38:18 -0700 Andy Cress andy.cr...@us.kontron.com wrote: Tushar, Thanks for running this down. So that means that the current driver implementation would never allow a NIC which has a BMC sideband connection physically to ever power off the PHY. That doesn't seem

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e check_mng_mode issue

to ensure that IPMI LAN had been disabled before exercising this. Would you like me to take a stab at implementing option 1, or do you have a better idea? Andy -Original Message- From: Jesse Brandeburg [mailto:jesse.brandeb...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 12:25 PM

Re: [E1000-devel] vlan steering

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 02:19:44 -0700 bill4carson bill4car...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, guys Just a quick question about vlan steering, does 82599 support this feature? I didn't see any description about it in the 82576/82599 specification I think what you're looking for is the VMDQ mode of the

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e: NIC not working (after resume?)

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Frederik Himpe fhi...@telenet.be wrote: [Crossposting to e1000 mailing list] I have a Dell Latitude E6400 which has a network card supported by the e1000e driver. Often (I think after a suspend/resume cycle), the network card does not work at all: the NIC is

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net-next-2.6] e1000: don't enable dma receives until after dma address has been setup

On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:31:38 -0700 Dean Nelson dnel...@redhat.com wrote: Doing an 'ifconfig ethN down' followed by an 'ifconfig ethN up' on a qemu-kvm guest system configured with two e1000 NICs can result in an 'unable to handle kernel paging request at 0001' or 'bad page map in

Re: [E1000-devel] 82574 DMA Burst Mode Enablement

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:39:54 -0700 Denis Radovanovic denis.radovano...@riverbed.com wrote: We are currently testing small packet performance on 82574, comparing it to 82571. Initial pktgen measurements have shown a significant difference in performance that is the most visible when running

Re: [E1000-devel] Possible to stop external IPMI/BMC access (port 623) by bringing iface up?

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:23:50 -0700 Carsten Aulbert carsten.aulb...@aei.mpg.de wrote: But now we reinstalled several machines with Debian Squeeze and suddenly we can only query the BMC when eth0 is down. The kernel we use is exactly the same (2.6.32.28 or 2.6.32.46 currently), i.e. same binary

Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

=3a3b75860527a11ba5035c6aa576079245d09e2a From: Jesse Brandeburg jesse.brandeb...@intel.com Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:38:49 + (+) Subject: e1000e: use hardware writeback batching X-Git-Tag: v2.6.37-rc1~147^2~299 X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds

Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:29:34 -0700 Michael Wang wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: May be you can just search macro E1000_TXDCTL_DMA_BURST_ENABLE in drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h, change it to: #define E1000_TXDCTL_DMA_BURST_ENABLE \ (E1000_TXDCTL_GRAN | /* set descriptor granularity */ \

Re: [E1000-devel] [BUG] e1000: possible deadlock scenario caught by lockdep

/0x164 [810a74ce] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x11c/0x148 [8125c6ee] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [81513882] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b The issue comes from two recent commits: commit a4010afef585b7142eb605e3a6e4210c0e1b2957 Author: Jesse Brandeburg

Re: [E1000-devel] [BUG] e1000: possible deadlock scenario caught by lockdep

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:57:37 -0800 Jesse Brandeburg jesse.brandeb...@intel.com wrote: CC'd netdev, and e1000-devel On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:27:00 -0800 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote: Here you see that we are calling cancel_delayed_work_sync(adapter-watchdog_task

Re: [E1000-devel] WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1904 skb_gso_segment+0x146/0x298()

cc: e1000-devel On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:30:34 -0800 Paweł Staszewski pstaszew...@itcare.pl wrote: After upgrade from 2.6.38.2 to 3.1.2 i have this im dmesg: [ 600.266497] WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1904 skb_gso_segment+0x146/0x298() [ 600.266500] Hardware name: X8DTU-6+ [ 600.266503] 802.1Q

Re: [E1000-devel] interface counters

On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 04:16 -0800, Bokhan Artem wrote: Hello! Is it possible to update interface counters more often then every 2 secs? Probably with some changes of source. yes it is possible and in fact several drivers do update a small set of stats in real time, or when called via the

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net-next 2/2] igb: offer a PTP Hardware Clock instead of the timecompare method

On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 19:00 -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: This commit removes the legacy timecompare code from the igb driver and offers a tunable PHC instead. Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran richardcoch...@gmail.com Richard, first, thanks for this work, I have some feedback and request you

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: Unsupported SFP+ modules on 10Gbit/s X520-DA2 NIC?

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:30:58 -0800 Jesper Dangaard Brouer h...@comx.dk wrote: I just bought three 10Gbit/s X520-DA2 NICs (82599 based) for production usage, but I cannot get them to accept any of my 10Gbit/s SFP+ modules (4 different tried). According to the documentation I can find, the

Re: [E1000-devel] High number of rx_missed_errors when chaning from 1.0.2-k2 to 1.2.20-k2/1.5.1-k

On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 02:06 -0800, Carsten Aulbert wrote: with 1.0.2-k2 and default options (except crcstripping=0) we get close to 120 MB/s and no dropped packets. rebooting the system to a kernel with a newer driver yields only 150-250kB/s throughput and a packet drop-rate close to

Re: [E1000-devel] rx_csum_offload_errors counter questions

On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 19:25 +0700, Bokhan Artem wrote: Any thoughts? May be somebody can point to description? On 09.02.2012 16:49, Bokhan Artem wrote: Hello. I have several questions about rx_csum_offload_errors counter for igb and ixgbe drivers: What type of errors

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel e1000e crashes on high throughput

please use e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net on all future replies. On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 23:42 -0500, Marcelo Pereira wrote: Hello, I have been struggling to use a NIC Intel e1000e, without success, for days!! I'm using the latest version of the driver (1.9.5), the kernel or the

Re: [E1000-devel] Fw: Enable VF only on 2nd 82576 port

Try modprobe igb max_vfs=-1,1 -- Spelling via autocorrect, please fogrive me On Mar 30, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Jemma Jones jemmajone...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: If I load the driver with modprobe igb max_vfs=0,1 which would mean 0 VFs in PF 0 and 1 VF on PF 1 then I get an error saying 0,1

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel 82574L rx_short_length_errors

On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:49:25 +0300 Aleksey Chudov aleksey.chu...@gmail.com wrote: I have few identical low end servers with the following integrated NICs: 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Connection 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L

Re: [E1000-devel] can't enable Flow Control for e1000e / 82572EI

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:54:02 +0200 Marko Kobal marko.ko...@arctur.si wrote: Hi, I have a Intel Corporation 82572EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 06) in my CentOS 5.7 (2.6.18-274.7.1.el5 x86_64) box. I have installed the latest drivers (e1000e-1.10.6.tar.gz) but can't enable

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] e1000e: MSI interrupt test failed, using legacy interrupt

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:59:47 -0700 Prasanna Panchamukhi ppanchamu...@riverbed.com wrote: On 04/19/2012 08:54 AM, Allan, Bruce W wrote: We have not seen a report of this issue before. Please provide details on the NIC or LOM and system/chipset on which the problem occurs and how the

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/2] e1000e: 82574 also needs ASPM L1 completely disabled

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:29:36 +0100 Chris Boot bo...@bootc.net wrote: Please note I haven't as-yet tested this code at all, but I do know that disabling ASPM L1 on these NICs (using setpci) fixes the hangs that I have been seeing on my Supermicro servers with X9SCL-F boards. I hope to get the

Re: [E1000-devel] ioatdma 0000:00:0a.1: Channel halted, chanerr = 2

On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:31:26 + John Adams john.ad...@avid.com wrote: Dear e1000-devel, I'm wondering what kernel versions people are happily using in production with the ixgbe driver? I'm having network stability and performance issues with a 2.6.32-131 modified Red Hat el6 on a quad

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel 82546GB chip does not work with OpenVSwitch

On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:37:04 +0200 Timm Essigke timm.essi...@uni-bayreuth.de wrote: I hope you can understand the cause of the problem from the ethregs output included in the files. Thank you very much! looks like the attachment(s) either wasn't included or didn't make it through the list

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net] e1000e: Change wthresh to 1 to avoid possible Tx stalls.

Jesse did not share any performance numbers with me, I am sure he can give some background tomorrow when he is back online. I am working on an alternative patch now and should have something to share tomorrow. Please allow me to ask if there's any progess here? I've tried

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e: ethtool -t fails when i/f is up

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:58:13 -0800 akepner akep...@riverbed.com wrote: With e1000e (versions 1.2.20, and 2.1.4) we've noticed that the ethtool selftest fails with a miscompare when the interface is up, but succeeds when it's down: Which hardware are you using? # lspci -nn what shows from:

Re: [E1000-devel] pci probe of 82574 fails

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:49:17 -0800 akepner akep...@riverbed.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:25:17PM +, Ronciak, John wrote: This could be BIOS configuration as well. Check the BIOS version as Tushar says but also look at how you have the device/slot configured in the BIOS.

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] net: low latency Ethernet device polling

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.comwrote: On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 22:20 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote: On 19/05/2013 22:06, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Eliezer Tamir eliezer.ta...@linux.intel.com wrote: This is an updated version

Re: [E1000-devel] Higher throughput at 100Mbps than 1Gbps

On Tue, 21 May 2013 19:24:24 +0100 Sam Crawford samcrawf...@gmail.com wrote: To be clear, this doesn't just affect this one hosting provider - it seems to be common to all of our boxes. The issue only occurs when the sender is connected at 1Gbps, the RTT is reasonably high ( ~60ms), and we use

Re: [E1000-devel] Memory Corruption with e1000

On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:38:50 -0700 Peter LaDow pet...@gocougs.wsu.edu wrote: On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Peter P Waskiewicz Jr peter.p.waskiewicz...@intel.com wrote: What about the pre-emption behavior of the kernel? Namely Processor type and Features - Preemption Model. Are you using

Re: [E1000-devel] [RFC 0/7] Fixing dma mask setting in various network drivers

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:08:49 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: While looking at the way coherent DMA masks are handled (and the fact many drivers write directly to the mask) I stumbled across this set of oddities in various network drivers, which looks like it's

Re: [E1000-devel] [RFC 0/7] Fixing dma mask setting in various network drivers

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 13:35:05 -0700 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: As part of my review of all this stuff, I'm wondering whether a helper to set both masks makes sense. Something like: static inline int dma_set_masks(struct device *dev, u64 mask) it doesn't need to be

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e on thinkpad x60: interrupt problem

On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:48:54 +0200 Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote: Yeah, of course you need to ask e1000e if it generated the interrupt. That part works. The part that actually generates the interrupt does not. Take a look at original mail... packet comes e1000e sets E1000_ICR_INT_ASSERTED

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net-next] drivers:net: Convert dma_alloc_coherent(...__GFP_ZERO) to dma_zalloc_coherent

memset from the static inline dma_zalloc_coherent and add just one use of __GFP_ZERO instead. Trivially reduces the size of the existing uses of dma_zalloc_coherent. Realign arguments as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches j...@perches.com e1000 and ixgb bits: Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg

Re: [E1000-devel] [net-next v5 8/8] i40e: include i40e in kernel proper

On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:01:41 -0400 David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote: Please rename this Kbuild file to the normal Makefile instead of trying to be different from every single other driver in the networking for the sake of an issue that is your, and your problem alone. Thanks Dave, will

Re: [E1000-devel] [patch net-next] i40e: remove dead fdb code

On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:10:29 +0100 Jiri Pirko j...@resnulli.us wrote: This code is not used now and also it contains some weird ifdefs. So remove it for now. It can be added when needed. First, thanks for looking at our code. but, NAK, the code just needs to have the #ifdefs removed. In

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: trivial fixes

On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:01:07 +0300 Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com wrote: Hello Jesse Brandeburg, The patch 895106a577c4: i40e: trivial fixes from Nov 26, 2013, leads to the following static checker warning: drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_hmc.c:107

Re: [E1000-devel] [net-next 8/9] i40e/i40evf: Bump i40e/i40evf version

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:52:37 +0200 Ronald van der Pol ronald.vander...@rvdp.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 23:01:46 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: netdev is not the right mailing list for this question. Adding e1000-devel mailing list... Sorry about that. I still have problems with

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e - Unqualified modules was detected

On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 20:44:06 + John McDowall jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to get a dual 10G X7100 interface up and on boot I am seeing the following message: i40e :04:00.0 p1p1: the driver failed to link because an unqualified module was detected.

Re: [E1000-devel] 82574l GB network controller for WinCE 5.0

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:33:40 +0300 Eli Kedem eli.ke...@ardix.co.il wrote: I am developing an NDIS (v5.1) miniport device driver for the 82574l GB network controller for WinCE 5.0. The main problem is that the BSP is very deficient and KITL does not work and the board does not have JTAG

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] i40e card Tx resets

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:56:14 -0400 Sowmini Varadhan wrote: > On (03/17/16 10:20), zhuyj wrote: > > 1. modprobe NET_PKTGEN > > > > 2. download the tar file and uncompress to any directory. > > This tar file is from kernel. It is in samples/pktgen/ > > > > 3. cd

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: xl710 chipset in 4.8 kernel

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 23:05:57 +0300 Yavuz Selim Komur wrote: > Hi, > > i40e drops all UDP traffic when upgrade to 4.8 from 4.7 linux kernel. > > all DHCP, DNS traffic stop. i40e not forwards any UDP. > > is this possible Hi Yavuz, please be more specific, as there may be

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe port missing, "PCI INT B: failed to register GSI"

On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:24:18 -0800 Ben Greear wrote: > On 12/06/2016 05:15 PM, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: > > Attachments don't work here. You'll have to file a bug on sourceforge, or > > file an IPS for factory support (and tell me the number so it doesn't sit). > > > >

Re: [E1000-devel] jitter / latency reduction

On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:09:42 -0800 Mahmood Qazen wrote: > greetings Leonardo > this is the slide / pdf I found and towards the end it asks if we > could help. > enjoy > Mahmood - Hi developers, thanks for your interest, we’d love to have help, but the good/bad news is that this

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] Not able to create VFs on PF passthrough of ethernet interface to VM

On Mon, 13 May 2019 07:36:41 + Periyasamy wrote: > Hi, > > I’m trying to achieve PF passthrough of 40/10G ethernet interface (i40e) into > guest VM running on qemu/kvm hypervisor and then create VFs on the PF inside > the VM. > This is to have a flexibility and better manageability of VFs

Re: [E1000-devel] errors on link xl 710

On 11/22/2021 9:43 PM, Jakub Osuch wrote: I have errors on link between nexus N3K-C3064PQ-10GX and LREC9902BF-2QSFP+. driver: i40e version: 2.17.4 Take a look: shorturl.at/crCNQ Hi Jakub, please file a bug at https://sourceforge.net/p/e1000/bugs/ Which will allow you to attach relevant

Re: [E1000-devel] Citrix Hypervisor (XenServer) - very poor performance with X710

On 3/14/2022 8:28 AM, Kevin Bowling wrote: Fortville (700) has always been a bit of a disaster (https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/331430?explicitVersion=true), I'd see if you can press your Intel reps into getting you the 550s or the 800-series NICs for the unnecessary troubles it's a

Re: [e1000-devel] idg driver compilation error on Ubuntu

On 10/30/2023 3:27 AM, adelio ALVES wrote: Thanks for your report! Something happened to the content of your message when I released it to the mailing list. Please use the driver included in your kernel (igb.ko.xz or the like) and let us know if you have any problems. Was there a reason you

Re: [e1000-devel] i40e: Intel XL710: Linux Debian 11: rx/tx-vlan-offload seems to be broken since 2.18.9

On 12/30/2022 11:15 AM, Andrey Kulikov wrote: Hello, I've got an Intel Fortville XL710-based Ethernet controller with 4 x 10GbE SFP+ ports. Platform is based on Intel Xeon CPU E5-2697 v4 Platform running Debian 11.6, kernel 5.10.0 # uname -a Linux 5.10.0-20-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.158-2

Re: [e1000-devel] [ice] Intel E810-C one queue after reboot

On 1/21/2023 6:17 AM, Highload Admin wrote: Hello! FYI, general spam filter guidance is to ignore mails from admin@ mails, so our list rejects your subscription. I'd change it but we get a lot of mails from bogus admin@ accounts. I have a problem with ice driver (I tried 1.10.1.2

Re: [E1000-devel] Driver issue 5.4.0-1064 Kernel

On 11/3/2022 9:05 AM, Trey Hughes via E1000-devel wrote: Good morning, I'm having an issue with installing the e1000e driver version 3.8.4 on Ubuntu 18.04 with Kernel 5.4.0-1064. When I go to make install per the readme instructions, I get an error stating the UTS_UBUNTU_RELEASE_ABI is too

Re: [e1000-devel] missing symbols ice and i40e for irdma modules

On 3/10/2023 12:25 AM, Dmitry Kravkov wrote: > after loading ice 1.11.14 module which compiled for 6.1.8 > irdma modules is not able to load due to missing symbols: > [1000969.082365] irdma: Unknown symbol ice_del_rdma_qset (err -2) > [1000969.082599] irdma: Unknown symbol ice_add_rdma_qset (err

Re: [e1000-devel] error in e1000e driver under ubuntu20.04 HWE with kernel 5.15.0-67

On 3/27/2023 12:32 AM, ST Cai wrote: > OS：Ubuntu Server 20.04 HWE > Kernel：5.15.0-67-generic > Adapter：Intel（6）I219-V；Vendor：0x8086；Product：0x15be； > Drivers ：e1000e-3.8.4/e1000e-3.8.4; > > make install Error: > > ethtool.c:2838:19: error: initialization of ‘int (*)(struct net_device *, > struct

Re: [e1000-devel] Stablish uni-directional ethernet link

On 7/28/2023 6:26 AM, Alireza Sadeghpour wrote: > Hi, I am trying to establish a uni-directional Ethernet link where a > singular fiber is used to transmit data to the receiver where both sides > use ixgbe as driver. The Rx of the transmit side and the Tx of the receive > side are not physically

Re: [e1000-devel] Issue with Intel Corporation 82546EB dual port card on Ubuntu 22.04

On 5/11/2023 9:54 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote: > Hi, > > I have a problem with my 8086:1010 Intel Corporation 82546EB Gigabit > Ethernet Controller (Copper) dual port ethernet card and Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS > using e1000 driver: This card is from 2003! :-) Nice that it's still running! Did you

Re: [e1000-devel] No versions for igb driver available on "modinfo igb" for SLE15-SP4

On 1/11/2024 4:21 AM, kumar.mo...@swisscom.com wrote: > Hi, > > Unlike the previous releases for the drivers, we don’t see the column for > version anymore for the Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver in SUSE > Linux (SLE15-SP4) when doing modinfo igb. > > Is this something expected and if

Re: [e1000-devel] Intel E810 100Gb goes down sporadically

On 12/3/2023 1:26 AM, Assaf Albo via E1000-devel wrote: > Hello guys, > > We are having constant network issues in production in that the link goes > down, waits *exactly* 7-8 seconds, and goes up again. > This can happen zero to a few times a day on all our servers; they are not > in the same