Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe,
Possibly your customer is running a kernel without source code on a
platform whose vendor wouldn't like to fix BIOS issue( Is that a HP/Dell
server ?).
Anyway, to see if is a payload issue or, you could change
...@vger.kernel.org;
e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe,
Possibly your customer is running a kernel without source code on a
platform whose vendor wouldn't like to fix BIOS issue( Is that a HP/Dell
: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:10 PM
To: Fujinaka, Todd
Cc: Joe Jin; Ben Hutchings; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org;
e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe,
Possibly your customer is running
...@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe,
Possibly your customer is running a kernel without source code on a
platform whose vendor wouldn't like to fix BIOS issue( Is that a HP/Dell server
?).
Anyway, to see if is a payload issue
On 11/28/12 02:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
Forgive me if I'm being too repetitious as I think some of this has
been mentioned in the past.
We (and by we I mean the Ethernet part and driver) can only change the
advertised availability of a
-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:31 AM
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org;
e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org;
e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 11/28/12 02:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka
Mcgrath [mailto:mary.mcgr...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 6:07 PM
To: Joe Jin
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Joe
Thank you for working this.
I would love to find out
, 2012 10:11 AM
To: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath
Cc: Joe Jin; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci
Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
Forgive me if I'm being
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
Forgive me if I'm being too repetitious as I think some of this has
been mentioned in the past.
We (and by we I mean the Ethernet part and driver) can only change the
advertised availability of a larger MaxPayloadSize. The size is
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Joe Jin wrote:
On 11/20/12 16:59, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Have you power off the system completely after modifying eeprom? If not
please do so.
Hi Tushar,
Seems not works for me, would you please help to check what is wrong of my
operations?
...
# lspci -s
On 11/27/12 00:23, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
If you look at the previous section, DevCap, you'll see that it's
correctly advertising 256 bytes but the system is negotiating 128 for
the link to the Ethernet controller. Things on the other side of the
link are controlled outside of the e1000 driver.
you.
Regards
Mary
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:00 PM
To: Fujinaka, Todd
Cc: Dave, Tushar N; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 9:38 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 11/16/12 04:26,
On 11/20/12 16:59, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Have you power off the system completely after modifying eeprom? If not
please do so.
Hi Tushar,
Seems not works for me, would you please help to check what is wrong of my
operations?
Original eeprom dump:
# ethtool -e eth3 | head -8
Offset
On 11/20/12 16:59, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Have you power off the system completely after modifying eeprom? If not
please do so.
seems not works for me, would you please help to check what is wrong of my
operations?
Original eeprom dump:
# ethtool -e eth3 | head -8
Offset Values
On 11/16/12 04:26, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Would you please help to fine the offset of max payload size in eeprom?
I'd like to have a try to modify it by ethtool.
It is defined using bit 8 of word 0x1A.
Bit value 0 = 128B , bit value 1 = 256B
Hi Tushar,
I checked one of my server which Max
On 11/09/12 04:35, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
All devices in path from root complex to 82571, should have *same* max
payload size otherwise it can cause hang.
Can you double check this?
Hi Tushar,
Checked with hardware vendor and they said no way to modify the max payload
size
from BIOS, can I
于 2012年11月09日 04:35, Dave, Tushar N 写道:
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Joe Jin
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:25 PM
To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:48 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 11/09/12 04:35,
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Joe Jin
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:25 PM
To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
Subject: 82571EB: Detected
On 11/09/12 04:35, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Are you sure this is not similar issue as before that you reported.
i.e.
Tushar,
Thanks for your quick response, I'll check with customer if they can modify the
Max
payload size from BIOS, this time issue hit on HP's server.
Thanks again,
Joe
On
driver
*From:* Andrew Peng [mailto:peng...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, August 24, 2012 10:29 AM
*To:* Dave, Tushar N
*Cc:* e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
** **
Hi, in regards to the ring dump, this is the response I
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
This is the output:
~$ sudo ethtool -S eth1 | grep tx_timeout_count
tx_timeout_count: 0
~$
I will try new driver, but this is a production server. I don't have any actual
problems with the nic, but I do keep
29.08.2012 6:29, Dave, Tushar N пишет:
Thanks for the info.
For both, 82571 and 80003ES2LAN, I see UnsuppReq+ and UncorrErr+ in lspci
(DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr+ FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr+ TransPend+)
Have you tried disabling tso (ethtool -K tso off)?
Yes, this doesn't help
Was this
-Original Message-
From: Nikolay Popov [mailto:niko...@popoff.net.ua]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 9:00 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
29.08.2012 6:29, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Have you tried
Hi, Dave!
Ok, I have set msglevel as you requested, let's wait for some logs
Also, about versions - we using 1.11.3-NAPI on both 3.3.6 and 3.5.2 hosts.
We was enforced to do that because with default kernel driver (at least 2.0.0
at 3.5.2) we see some misterious drops and delays (~1-2%, and
-Original Message-
From: Nikolay Popov [mailto:niko...@popoff.net.ua]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 1:29 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Hi, All
It seems that I'm getting same problems with 3.5.2 kernel
Hi, All
It seems that I'm getting same problems with 3.5.2 kernel - 80003ES2LAN
onboard NIC is going to reset from time to time under load
Aug 25 10:27:53 bras2 kernel: [134612.808590] e1000e :05:00.0: eth2:
Detected Hardware Unit Hang:
Aug 25 10:27:53 bras2 kernel: [134612.808590] TDH
mentioned by Flavio).
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Leitner [mailto:f...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 6:39 PM
To: Andrew Peng
Cc: Dave, Tushar N; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On Thu, 19 Jul
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Thus far disabling TSO via ethtool has seemed to work - can anyone explain
the technical reason why this appears to have fixed the issue?
--Andrew
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Peng peng...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry
please send me the full dmesg log.
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Peng [mailto:peng...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 6:24 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Thus far disabling TSO via
]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 4:42 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Attached is the dmesg output. Please let me know if this looks right.
There are two instances of the error here:
[361106.726601] e1000e
that msglvl is set correctly by running 'ethtool ethx'
-Tushar
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Peng [mailto:peng...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 4:42 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
4:42 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Attached is the dmesg output. Please let me know if this looks right.
There are two instances of the error here:
[361106.726601] e1000e :02:00.0: eth1
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:17:14 -0500
Andrew Peng peng...@gmail.com wrote:
Flavio;
I am using the stock kernel driver with the stock Debian Squeeze kernel.
Well, I don't have the debian kernel sources handy to check
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 10:35 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Somehow setting max payload to 256 from BIOS does not set this value for
all devices. I believe this is a BIOS bug.
And preferably, Linux should complain about it. Since we
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 10:35 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Somehow setting max payload to 256 from BIOS does not set this value for
all devices. I believe this is a BIOS bug.
And
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@hmh.eng.br wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 10:35 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Somehow setting max payload to 256 from BIOS does
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Somehow setting max payload to 256 from BIOS does not set this value for all
devices. I believe this is a BIOS bug.
And preferably, Linux should complain about it. Since we know it is going
to cause problems, and since we know it does happen, we
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:34 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/13/12 12:10, Dave, Tushar N
On 07/15/12 11:42, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:34 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware
On 07/12/12 13:57, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:13 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 12:11 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/12/12 14:41, Dave, Tushar N
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 4:46 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Thanks for sending full dmesg log. I
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:03 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/11/12 12:05, Dave, Tushar N
On 07/11/12 15:11, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:03 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware
On 07/11/12 15:37, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:18 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:39 AM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/11/12 15:37, Dave, Tushar N
On 07/11/12 15:50, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Device status and AER sections show some errors that looks little suspicious
to me but I'm not too sure. I will get back tomorrow.
Thanks a lot, Tushar!
Joe
--
Oracle http://www.oracle.com
Joe Jin | Software Development Senior Manager |
Folks, I've been getting some strange error messages in my home server
/ router that I've been having trouble debugging. I'm decently
proficient in Linux, but I fear I'm in over my head with this one.
The hardware is a HP N40L Microserver - here are the hardware details
-
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:03 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/11/12 12:05, Dave, Tushar N
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Peng [mailto:peng...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:50 AM
To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [E1000-devel] 82571EB - Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Folks, I've been getting some strange error messages in my home server /
router
On 07/12/12 02:51, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Joe,
I see couple of errors in lspci output.
Device capability status register shows UnCorrectable PCIe error. This means
there is certainly something went wrong. The only way to recover from
Uncorrectable errors is reset.
DevSta:
On 07/12/12 10:52, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
What is the exact error messages in BIOS log?
Error message from BIOS event log:
07/12/12 05:54:00
PCI Express Non-Fatal Error
Thanks,
Joe
--
Live Security Virtual
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 7:58 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/12/12 10:52, Dave, Tushar N
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:13 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/12/12 11:07, Dave, Tushar N
When I debug the driver I found before Detected HW hang, driver unable to clean
and reclaim the resources:
1457 while ((eop_desc-upper.data cpu_to_le32(E1000_TXD_STAT_DD))
== at here upper.data always is 0x300
1458(count tx_ring-count)) {
--- snip ---
1487
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Joe Jin
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:40 AM
To: Joe Jin
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware
-Original Message-
From: Dave, Tushar N
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:02 PM
To: Joe Jin
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; Dave, Tushar N
Subject: RE: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
-Original Message-
From:
On 07/11/12 03:02, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Joe Jin
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:40 AM
To: Joe Jin
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 5:35 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/11/12 03:02, Dave, Tushar N
On 07/11/12 11:22, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
Thanks for info. I see that hang occurs right when HW processing first TX
descriptor with TSO.
Would you be able to reproduce issue with TSO off? Disable TSO by 'ethtool
-K ethx tso off'
Let all debug enabled as it is, that will help us debug
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:29 PM
To: Dave, Tushar N
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
On 07/11/12 11:22, Dave, Tushar N
Hi list,
I'm seeing a Unit Hang even with the latest e1000e driver 2.0.0 when doing
scp test. this issue is easy do reproduced on SUN FIRE X2270 M2, just copy
a big file (500M) from another server will hit it at once.
Would you please help on this?
device info:
# lspci -s 05:00.0
05:00.0
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 16:51 +0800, Joe Jin wrote:
Hi list,
I'm seeing a Unit Hang even with the latest e1000e driver 2.0.0 when doing
scp test. this issue is easy do reproduced on SUN FIRE X2270 M2, just copy
a big file (500M) from another server will hit it at once.
Would you please
(moving the discussion back to the list)
Hi,
I am sorry, I didn't receive your patch as we discussed in private
and ended up writing one patch myself which essentially does the
same thing.
The patch is available at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746272#c13
It schedules a
Hi, Flavio, Jesse
I have send out the patch, which I hope can do some help.
Because this is my first time to send a patch, I am sorry if
I have done some silly thing.
And please tell me if there are some problem about it.
Thanks Best regards,
Michael Wang
On 10/25/2011 12:26 AM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:26:28 +0800
Michael Wangwang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 10/21/2011 10:03 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:15:12 +0800
Michael Wangwang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 10/19/2011 08:16 PM, Flavio
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:29:34 -0700
Michael Wang wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
May be you can just search macro
E1000_TXDCTL_DMA_BURST_ENABLE
in drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h, change it to:
#define E1000_TXDCTL_DMA_BURST_ENABLE \
(E1000_TXDCTL_GRAN | /* set descriptor granularity */ \
On 10/25/2011 11:57 PM, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:29:34 -0700
Michael Wangwang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
May be you can just search macro
E1000_TXDCTL_DMA_BURST_ENABLE
in drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h, change it to:
#define E1000_TXDCTL_DMA_BURST_ENABLE \
On 10/21/2011 10:03 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:15:12 +0800
Michael Wangwang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 10/19/2011 08:16 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:49:48 +0800
wangyunwang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi, Flavio
I am new to join the
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:26:28 +0800
Michael Wang wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 10/21/2011 10:03 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:15:12 +0800
Michael Wangwang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 10/19/2011 08:16 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:49:48
On 10/19/2011 08:16 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:49:48 +0800
wangyunwang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi, Flavio
I am new to join the community, work on e1000e driver currently,
And I found a thing strange in this issue, please check below.
Thanks,
Michael Wang
On
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:15:12 +0800
Michael Wang wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 10/19/2011 08:16 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:49:48 +0800
wangyunwang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi, Flavio
I am new to join the community, work on e1000e driver currently,
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:49:48 +0800
wangyun wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi, Flavio
I am new to join the community, work on e1000e driver currently,
And I found a thing strange in this issue, please check below.
Thanks,
Michael Wang
On 10/18/2011 10:42 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:48:22 -0700
Jesse Brandeburg jesse.brandeb...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:04:26 -0700
Flavio Leitner f...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I got few reports so far that 82571EB models are having the
Detected Hardware Unit Hang issue after upgrading the
Hi, Flavio
I am new to join the community, work on e1000e driver currently,
And I found a thing strange in this issue, please check below.
Thanks,
Michael Wang
On 10/18/2011 10:42 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:48:22 -0700
Jesse Brandeburgjesse.brandeb...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:04:26 -0700
Flavio Leitner f...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I got few reports so far that 82571EB models are having the
Detected Hardware Unit Hang issue after upgrading the kernel.
Further debugging with an instrumented kernel revealed that the
socket buffer time
Hi,
I got few reports so far that 82571EB models are having the
Detected Hardware Unit Hang issue after upgrading the kernel.
Further debugging with an instrumented kernel revealed that the
socket buffer time stamp matches with the last time e1000_xmit_frame()
was called. Also that the time
80 matches
Mail list logo
