On 2010-07-28, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-07-28, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
Where should the socket be freed? In bsd_accept() where it is removed
from the queue? Or in socket.cxx when the fd/fp are freed?
I would say in bsd_accept(). However, it would be
On 2010-07-27, Jay Foster j...@systech.com wrote:
You could try TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 2 (and volume 1) by Gary R.
Wright and W. Richard Stevens, published by Addison Wesley. It's a bit
dated, but the basics are there. It shows the network code listings,
bit by bit, with an
On 2010-07-27, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing what appears to me to be a socket leak in the accept()
operation provided by the new BSD network stack.
The stack is definitely leaking sockets. I can now reliably reproduce
the problem by opening a TCP connection and
On 2010-07-28, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-07-27, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing what appears to me to be a socket leak in the accept()
operation provided by the new BSD network stack.
The stack is definitely leaking sockets. I can now
On 7/28/2010 12:56 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-07-28, Grant Edwardsgrant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-07-27, Grant Edwardsgrant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing what appears to me to be a socket leak in the accept()
operation provided by the new BSD network stack.
The
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:56:41PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-07-28, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-07-27, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing what appears to me to be a socket leak in the accept()
operation provided by the new BSD
On 2010-07-28, Jay Foster j...@systech.com wrote:
On 7/28/2010 12:56 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
It's possible that this bug has been found and fixed in the free BSD
sources. You could download the latest free BSD source
Can I?
I can browse SVN or CVS repositories (which is nightmarishly
On 2010-07-28, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:56:41PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-07-28, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-07-27, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing what appears to me to be a socket leak in
On 2010-07-28, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:56:41PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-07-28, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-07-27, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing what appears to me to be a socket leak in
I can browse SVN or CVS repositories (which is nightmarishly slow and
I can't grep for things). But, while you can browse sources, they
don't allow sources to be checked out without prior authorization.
FreeBSD's own notes (found at http://wiki.freebsd.org/SubversionPrimer)
are a bit
On 2010-07-28, Ross Younger w...@ecoscentric.com wrote:
I can browse SVN or CVS repositories (which is nightmarishly slow and
I can't grep for things). But, while you can browse sources, they
don't allow sources to be checked out without prior authorization.
FreeBSD's own notes (found at
On 2010-07-27, Jay Foster j...@systech.com wrote:
I don't know about the socket leak, per se, but I have had some
dealings with the original BSD network stack with regards to the
accept() call. From my memory, I remember there being two queues on
which the socket might be placed
You could try TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 2 (and volume 1) by Gary R.
Wright and W. Richard Stevens, published by Addison Wesley. It's a bit
dated, but the basics are there. It shows the network code listings,
bit by bit, with an explanation for each line.
Jay
On 7/27/2010 3:39 PM, Grant
13 matches
Mail list logo
