I would not mind to pay a Testing fee if I get something better in return.Instead, from a long plentiful experience, I get:- Incomprehensible error messages for test data that I need to guess what they mean- Wait a day until the system process the latest new test data- Test data
My “favorite” is the testing and associated fee because “My Trading Partner” is
demanding EDI, and then after completing the testing (and ponying up), we never
see any EDI from the Customer at all.
I currently have five of these “You must do EDI” deals, and am balking at the
next. When our
- My favorite: I sent a test EDI 856 (ASN) against a test EDI order (850) and
it was rejected because my Ship-Date was today, and
in the test EDI order it said that the ship-date should 12/5/1997. A bit of
creative EDI and fixed the issue to pass this
Testing phase.
If the rumors I've
I once had to set up a dozen customers for receiving and/or transmitting EDI
documents but it never happened. Three were on credit hold; the other nine
had other excuses. And all were new to our company and required EDI in
order to do business. Even though I was given an EDI contact for each
My favorite (happened last week) is the Test PO contained an Incorrect Vendor
ID.
Took a LOT of back-and-forth as to whether the test 810/856 needed to repeat
the bad data or to use the correct data.
I will say this, once I got a live person on the phone, he was very
helpful—especially as we
Actually, Wordpad is my secret weapon in fixing EDI from SAP shops that can't
correct and resend their documents.
Dan
From: Michael Mattias/LS mcmlse...@talsystems.com
To: EDI-L@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] RE: Beating the 'evil' Testing Fees
I'll take this to the next peeve, customer demanding you change your VAN to the
one they use, especially the users of ANX.
These type of demands are not being friendly, cooperative trading partners.
What's next? Demanding you use FedEx when you use UPS?
From: Jason McMahon
UltraEdit. Second that.
Sent from my Motorola ATRIX™ 4G on ATT
-Original message-
From: Matt Brown mbr...@easylink.com
To: raan...@gmail.com raan...@gmail.com, EDI-L@yahoogroups.com
EDI-L@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, Sep 13, 2013 13:53:49 GMT+00:00
Subject: RE: [EDI-L] RE: Beating the
I even have some UltaEdit javascript macros that strip segments and renumber HL
hierarchy sequences, etc.
UltraEdit is an exceptional piece of work!
Travis-
- Original Message -
From: Bud Blankenship jags7...@yahoo.com
To: Matt Brown mbr...@easylink.com, raan...@gmail.com,
We do not require specific VAN service at ANX.
From: EDI-L@yahoogroups.com [mailto:EDI-L@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of PCD
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 10:00 AM
To: EDI--L
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Testing Fees
I'll take this to the next peeve, customer demanding you change your VAN to the
one
What's next? Demanding you use FedEx when you use UPS?
IMNSHO that is not an unreasonable request if the 'demand' comes from whomever
is PAYING the freight!
I'm not saying the request should automatically be granted, but it's not
unreasonable.
Michael C. Mattias
Tal Systems Inc.
Racine WI
I'll take this to the next peeve, customer demanding you change your VAN to
the one they use, especially the users of ANX.
...
I once had to set up a dozen customers for receiving and/or transmitting EDI
documents but it never happened. Three were on credit
hold; the other nine had other
I'll take this to the next peeve, customer demanding you change your VAN to
the one they use, especially the users of ANX.
We have a customer who specifies a Van (GXS) and ***NO*** interconnects.
What's next? Demanding you use FedEx when you use UPS?
A charmed life, methinks.
We have
That is your customers requirement, not ANX’s. Just wanted to make that clear.
From: Jim Guthrie [mailto:jguthr...@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:39 AM
To: Scott, Felicia; EDI-L@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Testing Fees
I'll take this to the next peeve, customer
ANX DOES NOT REQUIRE A SPECIFIC VAN. YOU NEED TO GET YOUR INFO CORRECT BEFORE
SPAMMING EVERYONE!! AND WE DO HAVE MANAGED SERVICES WHICH MOST PARTNERS DO NOT
UTILIZE.
From: EDI-L@yahoogroups.com [mailto:EDI-L@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Mattias/LS
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013
From: Michael Mattias/LS
- My favorite: I sent a test EDI 856 (ASN) against a test EDI order (850) and
it was rejected because my Ship-Date was today, and
in the test EDI order it said that the ship-date should 12/5/1997. A bit of
creative EDI and fixed the issue to pass this
Testing
I'll take this to the next peeve, customer demanding you change your VAN to
the one they use, especially the users of ANX.
We have a customer who specifies a Van (GXS) and ***NO*** interconnects.
I am not a lawyer (my mother loved me nonetheless), but that sure sounds like a
conspiracy in
UltraEdit is definitely shareware (30 day trial).
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.ultraedit.com/downloads/ultraedit_download.html
(Paid version $79.95)
EditPlus is definitely shareware (30 day trial).
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.editplus.com/download.html
(Paid
I am not a lawyer (my mother loved me nonetheless), but that sure sounds like
a
conspiracy in restraint of trade, a violation of the
1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Act.
As long as the VAN is not prohibiting you from going business with another VAN,
I don’t see where Sherman would kick in.
I suspect
Amen to this… and when you give them honest, even critical feedback, nothing
result
From: EDI-L@yahoogroups.com [mailto:EDI-L@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
raan...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 5:37 AM
To: EDI-L@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [EDI-L] RE: Beating the 'evil' Testing Fees
I am not a lawyer (my mother loved me nonetheless), but that sure sounds like
a
conspiracy in restraint of trade, a violation of the
1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Act.
As long as the VAN is not prohibiting you from going business with another VAN,
I don’t see where Sherman would kick in.
If customer
21 matches
Mail list logo
