[Edu-sig] CTL: Computer Thinking Language

2009-03-02 Thread David MacQuigg
Apologies for the munged formatting of my original message. Here it is with leading dots to preserve the indent. To: edu-sig@python.org Subject: CTL: Computer Thinking Language There is an interesting article in the latest ACM {Human Computing Skills: Rethinking the K-12 Experience, Fletcher

Re: [Edu-sig] CTL: Computer Thinking Language

2009-03-02 Thread Jason Axelson
As a current college student myself, I feel like chiming in here. 2009/3/2 michel paul mpaul...@gmail.com: However, it is again more mathematically effective to read 2 + 3 * 4 as the sum of 2 and the product of 3 and 4, or,  sum(2, product(3, 4)).  No ambiguity there!  And this is how you have

Re: [Edu-sig] CTL: Computer Thinking Language

2009-03-02 Thread kirby urner
Having come from APL, later Logo, I'm used to interactive REPL (direct interaction with an interpreter), gradually building up a namespace i.e. as you define turtle-drawing functions, these get remembered. You save to disk for persistence, but the primary experience is of being in a session and