On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 12:34:29 PM -0800, Robert Arkiletian (rob...@gmail.com)
wrote:
In my opinion, the days of LTSP are numbered. For a few different
reasons.
1) hardware is so cheap now. You can buy a brand new power efficient
and fast desktop system for about $200 (not including
OK... I give! ;-)
Robert A. (aka: of Fl_TeacherTool fame) came by for a visit last summer with
his beautiful family and explained to me, among other things, how DRBL
worked. I had read about it a year earlier and even grabbed the scripts but
didn't go any further with it (I've been terribly
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:57 AM, M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 12:34:29 PM -0800, Robert Arkiletian (rob...@gmail.com)
wrote:
In my opinion, the days of LTSP are numbered. For a few different
reasons.
I kind of regret putting it that way. How I really feel
12.11.2010 18:07, Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
So let's find out what DRBL or LTSP can do with it or with much more
powerful machine like Duo Core Atom/ION. I can use this weekend and few
days in next week for testing.
I have now both DRBL and LTSP setup. Both setup uses two NICs. NAT and
local
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 10:22:36 AM -0800, Robert Arkiletian
(rob...@gmail.com) wrote:
Netlive looks very interesting. Especially for almost zero setup
time. A live distro that serves out another live distro. Well done.
DRBL does something similar, you guys may be able to collaborate
with them.
Hi Asmo,
DRBL uses fat client. LTSP is capable both thin and fat. Which one you
have in ltsp test environment?
-- Jarkko
12.11.2010 18:07, Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
So let's find out what DRBL or LTSP can do with it or with much more
powerful machine like Duo Core Atom/ION. I can use this
13.11.2010 23:28, Jarkko Joensuu kirjoitti:
DRBL uses fat client. LTSP is capable both thin and fat. Which one you
have in ltsp test environment?
Fat. Of course there is thin, too.
sudo ltsp-build-client --arch i386 --chroot i386-fat --fat-client
--fat-client-desktop ubuntu-desktop
