schrieb Matt Hayes:
I'm curious if upgrading from 2.1.2 to the new beta is going to cause
any major issues.
The reason I want to clarify as this is that Endian is my main
firewall/router at home and if I break it, my wife will surely kill
me :)
-Matt
AHA! Well, I'm not too worried about
Pedro M. S. Oliveira wrote:
Hi does anyone know the roadmap for the final release of EFW 2.2?
Thanks
Pedro
http://bugs.endian.it/roadmap_page.php
-Matt
Mariano Sokal wrote:
Hello from Buenos Aires... Any idea when the 2.2 version will be
released to the community? I am waiting to try it :)
Best regards,
Mariano Sokal
If you look at bugs.endian.it and look at the Roadmap link.. it will
give you a clue as to where they are in the
Does anyone know if with the release of 2.2 RC3 how safe it is to
backup a current 2.1.2 config and then upgrade and restore? Is there
any type of upgrade path at this time?
Thanks,
Matt
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by
I'm curious if anyone else is utilizing the sip proxy in endian 2.2rc3
If so, and have gotten it to work, can you give me an insight as to are
you using as transparent or did you actually configure and outbound
server etc?
I have it configured, but not sure if my vonage adapter is actually
being
I'm on 2.2RC3 and I've noticed that the firewall log doesn't seem to
exist. I checked the bugs site and I don't see this bug mentioned yet,
but i wanted to check here first before I filed anything to see if
anyone else has this issue or if a fix is already in place etc.
Thanks!
-Matt
Just one quick question:
When enabling a proxy, the firewall will create the proper rules.
I've noticed on 2.2 that the rules for SIPROXDPORTFW have nothing at all
in them.
Could this be because the outgoing firewall is disabled at this time?
If not, is anyone else using 2.2 with siproxd and
mbleiweiss wrote:
Per the Endian bug tracker, there was a bug with ID#0001444
http://bugs.endian.it/view.php?id=1444 which (if I understand it correctly)
basically means that if you set up traffic shaping in the web interface, it
doesn't get enabled. Or, per the bug description: traffic
Steven Sher wrote:
I currently have one Snom phone using VOIP working fine behind my Endian
Firewall v2.2 Beta3, but having endless hassles trying to get a 2^nd
phone to work behind the firewall.
The 2^nd phone can register with the hosted PABX but cant receive any
calls. I have got
Lee Marzke wrote:
Matt Hayes wrote:
Steven Sher wrote:
I currently have one Snom phone using VOIP working fine behind my Endian
Firewall v2.2 Beta3, but having endless hassles trying to get a 2^nd
phone to work behind the firewall.
The 2^nd phone can register with the hosted PABX
More than likely, just as the last release, there won't be a true
upgrade path for those of us on 2.2RC3 going to 2.3.
It'll more than likely be a backup config install from scratch
restore config process.
-Matt
Marco Aurélio wrote:
Hi,
Is there any word on the release version of Endian
ed...@brbyte.com.br wrote:
Use the efw-toolbox.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/efw-toolbox
Download it, copy it to the efw (scp) and install using rpm --install.
Very nice! Didn't even know that existed.. Bookmarked.
-Matt
Steven Sher wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the upgrade option very nice feature!
What versions can be upgraded to 2.2? i.e what is the oldest version
that can be upgraded?
Also will I loos my settings?
Thanks
Steve
I too love this feature!
Steve:
I did this the
Pedro M. S. Oliveira wrote:
I just did a fresh install and recovered from a backup I previously did.
Cheers,
Pedro
www.linux-geex.com http://www.linux-geex.com/
Pedro,
When you say you 'recovered' from a backup, you did a fresh install and
a restore from a 2.2 backup you did?
Reason I'm
Luca Giovenzana wrote:
Best option is to backup, reinstall and restore, that's because of a bug
in 2.3 rc1 which assigns a very small size to /var/log partition.
http://bugs.endian.it/view.php?id=2288
Have fun with your 2.3
Luca
What about an upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3 using efw-upgrade :)
Ignore this... I rebooted the firewall after making some changes and
everything appears to be working :)
-matt
Matt Hayes wrote:
Rafael Fonseca wrote:
Maybe your Spam folder got something?
Gmail is known for marking messages from unknown boxes as Spam. I had to
manually add rules to my
500 Internal error
The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from
fulfilling the request.
Anyone else getting this?
I've also noticed snortd eating up nearly 100% of the cpu
-Matt
--
Come
On 12/23/2009 12:25 PM, John Marotta wrote:
Jonas,
You have to run thru the Network Wizard and select the 2 ETH interfaces
you want to use.
You must add the IP address in the “Add additional addresses” box
including the CIDR.
Ahh cool that's something I didn't even know :)
On 1/4/2010 3:33 PM, oneforall immortal wrote:
well I'll have to go back to 2.2 I guess , I was going to paste my
domainanmme/blah/snapshot.jpg to some one and I could even check if it
works first .
all I want is it to work locally also (using the www.mydomain.com) but
it refuses times out
On 09/15/2010 05:03 PM, Mallela Anil Kumar wrote:
Hello Sir,
i Installed Endian Firewall In My Origination.while i was trying to
block mail.Google.com http://mail.Google.com at the same time my
google apps company mails accounts also blocking the firewall.
With Regards,
Mallela
Noticed this port in the firewall logs. Lots of connects to it from
127.0.0.1 (Endian firewall itself).
What in the heck is this? More of a curious question than anything..
its listening on a port.. only on localhost, but connecting to itself.
Just odd.
Thanks,
Matt
On 1/31/2011 11:59 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
Noticed this port in the firewall logs. Lots of connects to it from
127.0.0.1 (Endian firewall itself).
What in the heck is this? More of a curious question than anything..
its listening on a port.. only on localhost, but connecting to itself
-8323
Become a Fan! - http://www.facebook.com/cokercollege
http://www.coker.edu | http://support.coker.edu
On 02/03/2011 10:02 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
On 1/31/2011 11:59 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
Noticed this port in the firewall logs. Lots of connects to it from
127.0.0.1 (Endian firewall
On 2/11/2011 11:16 AM, Claudio Roberti wrote:
This morning I started receiving bad messages from the proxy server,
like */(104) Connection reset by peer/* or zero length reply from
server for every site I try to browse.
Thinked of possible error with DNS but even changing it did not solved,
On 2/11/2011 12:05 PM, Claudio Roberti wrote:
I have done the same but the antivirus service HTTP antivirus (havp)
does not restart and I had to remove the virus check from the
contentfilter to browse again, can you tell me why the service does not
start. When I run the freshclam -v command
On 03/01/2011 08:20 AM, Vassilis V. wrote:
Hi all!
A couple of weeks ago I had a major issue on all Endian boxes as the
ClamAV database was corrupted and had to manually be reseted.
It was reported here by some users along with a fix.
Did you all experience the same problem again
On 03/17/2011 05:51 PM, Kevin Murphy wrote:
SIP proxy has been removed from version 2.4.1 so if he is using the sip
proxy I don't see how that will help!
Sent from my HTC Desire HD
-Original Message-
From: Nelson (Hotmail) [nelsonfi...@hotmail.com]
Received: 17/03/2011 21:48
On 4/4/2011 1:29 PM, Andres Gonzalez wrote:
Hello,
I have installed EFW 2.4.1 and I need to setup a dyndns account but it's
not working.
I found that there's a bug (http://bugs.endian.com/view.php?id=3307),
but is still not working.
Any idea ?
Regards.
--
AGD
Did you run
If you are forwarding the ports, the proxy is pretty much moot.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:51 PM, luis felipe picó herrero
lfph...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am new with endian firewall and I have a doubt regarding its operation
with SIP. I am using Asterisk as proxy server behind the
If you're on a mini you should have a support contract with Endian. Did
you try calling their paid support line? This mailing list is mainly aimed
at the Endian Open Source edition
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Herbert Appel postmas...@nx-networx.dewrote:
Hi guys,
I´m sitting behind an
As far as I'm aware, tcpdump is usable from the command line already
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:36 PM, luis felipe picó herrero
lfph...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if anybody knows how to install Wireshark on Endian
2.3. I want to run it on the shell but I have not been
Just a question, but do you have port 5060 port forwarding or a 1-to-1 NAT
or anything?
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Scott Howell scott.howel...@gmail.comwrote:
I can't think of any reason this is happening but it is. I have a 3CX
IP-PBX behind Community 2.5.1. I ran a Wireshark on my
Connection Address: 134.2.0.0
Sincerely,
Scott Howell
Mobile : 404-735-5273
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Matt Hayes domin...@slackadelic.comwrote:
Just a question, but do you have port 5060 port forwarding or a 1-to-1
NAT or anything?
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Scott Howell
, May 30, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Matt Hayes domin...@slackadelic.comwrote:
This cuts off, but I just ssh'd into my Endian and did lsmod | grep sip
and here's my results:
nf_nat_sip 3710 0
nf_conntrack_sip 10485 1 nf_nat_sip
nf_nat 10267 9
iptable_nat,nf_nat_sip
had
some strange behavior with the IPSEC VPN however on a this rollout of 9
locations that I may start a new thread on it's just low on my list right
now.
Sincerely,
Scott Howell
Mobile : 404-735-5273
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Matt Hayes domin...@slackadelic.comwrote:
I
When you say NAT'd IP, you mean that the IP address on your Endian isn't
the public? If so, the VPN probably won't work properly. IPSec isn't
meant to be NAT'd...
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Lorenzo Milesi
lorenzo.mil...@yetopen.itwrote:
Hi.
I have a 2.5.1 installation which works
Is your internal DNS server authoritative for myserver.mydomain.org? What
is the error that dig returns?
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Steve Owley
sow...@westervillelibrary.orgwrote:
Hello and thank you for your help,
** **
I have an endian machine set up RGB for evaluation. There
is the error from endian:**
**
** **
; DiG 9.2.4 @10.0.1.159 myserver.mydomain.org
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
** **
Steve
** **
*From:* Matt Hayes [mailto:domin...@slackadelic.com]
*Sent
Look at time out values within the DSL modem, it's possible that it's
renewing ports or something for forwarding. Hard to say how the modem is
doing forwarding though.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Lorenzo Milesi
lorenzo.mil...@yetopen.itwrote:
When you say NAT'd IP, you mean that the
Don't think I've ever seen ntop crash the box, specifically power it off.
I'd say someone powered it off or you had a brown out causing the server
to power itself off if it isn't on UPS.
-Matt
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Andres Gonzalez tuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello:
I have a problem
tuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Matt!
We can discard that it's specifically power off. Today happened again at
the same time.
I thinks that there's a hardware issue or there's a process that makes
this happens.
Regards.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Matt Hayes domin
Are you sure they aren't issuing that through PPPoE? I've only seen that
used in PPPoE setups, but trying to statically set it probably won't work
as the system would see it as unroutable as it would be in it's 'own'
subnet basically.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Cultrure cultr...@gmail.com
Set the proxy to be transparent... no need to remove any rules.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:57 AM, danillo F. danill...@hotmail.com wrote:
I did that, but just disabling the rules is still possible to navigate,
even without setting the proxy in navigated.
att
danillo
Date: Mon, 23 Dec
What do you mean by the 'navigation proxy'? That's the confusing party.
You either use the proxy or you don't. You have a few ways to do this.
one is to configure the proxy as transparent so that it filters all HTTP
traffic or you turn it on and point specifically to it. But, I've never
heard
Ok, I think I understand now. There is a way to do this, and probably more
ways, but you can possibly do it with a DHCP option or if you run Windows
Server, you can use group policy to deploy proxy settings to all machines
to force them to utilize the proxy for internet browsing.
On Tue, Dec
What makes you think it's a DNS problem? Does it happen on more than one
web page or does it seem to happen on the same web pages all the time or is
it just random?
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:29 AM, ANIS El Achèche elachechea...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey Guys!
I have some navigation problems, and
elache...@ubuntu.com | # whoami
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/elacheche *
*I am what I am because of who we all are - The Ubuntu Philosophy*
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Matt Hayes domin...@slackadelic.comwrote:
What makes you think it's a DNS problem? Does it happen on more than one
web page
:26 PM, Matt Hayes domin...@slackadelic.comwrote:
Are you using the DNS Proxy service on Endian?
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:17 AM, ANIS El Achèche
elache...@ubuntu.comwrote:
So for the 1st 2 weeks I used OpenDNS.. then my ISP told me that I have
the problems because we don't have openDNS
22, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Matt Hayes domin...@slackadelic.comwrote:
Very odd... I've not had this issue myself. Then again, I'm on the
bleeding edge 3.x release right now..
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:33 AM, ANIS El Achèche
elache...@ubuntu.comwrote:
I'm not.. But the status page show me
You're talking about 'trunking' of providers, which isn't possible unless
the provider is configured to accept a trunked connection.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:48 PM, ANIS El Achèche elache...@ubuntu.comwrote:
Hey!
Any one here know a way to combine many WANs like if I have just one??
Not
So,
This has been asked quite a bit and now I'm curious.
IS this project dead? Should I start looking for something else at this
time to accommodate my needs?
Thank you,
-Matt
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with
of your mind, I think
you're right.
Davide.
Il 14/10/14 17:01, Matt Hayes ha scritto:
So,
This has been asked quite a bit and now I'm curious.
IS this project dead? Should I start looking for something else at this
time to accommodate my needs?
Thank you,
-Matt
...@ubuntu.com elache...@ubuntu.com | # whoami
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/elacheche*
*I am what I am because of who we all are - The Ubuntu Philosophy*
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Matt Hayes domin...@slackadelic.com
wrote:
I hate to look at doing that, looking for something new. The Endian
This is yet ANOTHER query into the status of Endian Firewall Community.
I've been using it for a long time, submitted bug reports, etc. Would
someone from Endian please give us some kind of freakin' answer as to what
is happening with this project?
Thank you,
-Matt
Hate to agree here, but I am. I'm in the process of moving away from
Endian Firewall Community as the support for it, this mailing list, and
almost everything else appears to be dead. Sick of waiting even though
they state it's still alive.
-Matt
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Davide
I've been testing opnsense (opnsense.org) a pfsense fork.. really like it.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Jason phibro...@gmail.com wrote:
I've heard pfSense was a good Alternative to Endian... as I still run
this for my school/church.
I am looking for alteratives as well... I also run a
I'm only responding as most likely you will not get a response from Endian
themselves, I'm not sure why it is not working if you have syn flood
protection enabled already. I myself am slowly moving from Endian Firewall
Community as I'm not able to get any answers from Endian or their
developers
development of the community version
and it is wise to move to an other firewall.
best regards
Am 09.02.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Matt Hayes:
I'm only responding as most likely you will not get a response from
Endian themselves, I'm not sure why it is not working if you have syn
flood
58 matches
Mail list logo
