Toby Deinhardt wrote:
No CE mark seen but I dont think it needs one in Kit form.
For the kit version likely not, but, afaik, anyone who ordered an
Although it might be technically legal (speculation), I very much doubt
that the kit exemption envisaged a pre-aligned sub-assembly kit, like
Although it might be technically legal (speculation), I very much
doubt that the kit exemption envisaged a pre-aligned sub-assembly kit,
As much as I hate to bother Eric right now, maybe he could give us a
short update on the CE Marking certification status of the K3. Eric was
looking into the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft List elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K3] CE Mark
Toby Deinhardt wrote:
No CE mark seen but I dont think it needs one in Kit form.
For the kit version likely not, but, afaik, anyone who ordered
Hi David,
Since the K3 kit requires 7 to 8 hours of customer assembly of our
components following the detailed steps in our 60 page assembly manual,
and because it does involve customer alignment and set up of the PLL,
filters etc (via the front panel interface) it clearly does fall under
Hi David,
I agree with this point too. All of the components of the K3 are
designed only for use inside that radio and not as general general
options for other manufacturer's products. The boards are not stand
alone products.
73, Eric WA6HHQ
David Cutter wrote:
An interesting
In what way do you envision?
Its reached at least one 'G' now - I don't care about CE at all - it isn't
worth the paper its printed (or often not) on.
I've come across quite a lot of imported gear with a CE - no way does it
meet even the most basic standard.
Sorry, this came out confrontational -
Hallo David,
AFAIK, you as the importer of electronic devices are responsible for
conformity with EU regulations, whether they make sense or not. It is
easy to imagine an official, with nothing better to do, causing serious
problems for the importer of said equipment.
A lot of what is in
7 matches
Mail list logo
