The XY RTTY tuning ovals are based on the mark and space signals
which are 170 Hz apart. I can easily tune RTTY signals with the
10 Hz tuning step in the K3, so 10 Hz stability on both the
transmitter and the receiver should be good enough for reliable operation.
With the low stability TCXO
Eric,
Thanks for the correction/update. That fits my measurements,
exactly. I recall about the time the EXREF came out the better spec
was given on the TCXO03-1. Regarding the use of wrong part
terminology (TCXO-3) its just sloppy memory of the exact product
number. I think most knew
Hi Ed,
Minor note on our TCXO part numbers:
The tighter temp stability TCXO (0.5 ppm typical) is actually Elecraft part
number "TCXO3-1". This is the p/n that shows on the K3S order page and in the
K3S kit manual as an upgrade.
The standard TCXO (5 ppm) supplied with the K3S and K3 has the
The external reference is only applicable to the K3/K3S with the EXREF
option.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 3/14/2016 3:51 AM, Cortland Richmond wrote:
50% OT but...
I'm not complaining about stability, mind; the KX3 temperature
compensation routine works really well, but if I use a GPSDO-clocked
On 3/13/2016 9:08 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
I think everyone is ignoring something here. What causes the frequency
drift in the first place?
It is temperature changes - the designation TCXO signifies
50% OT but...
I'm not complaining about stability, mind; the KX3 temperature
compensation
Something I have wondered since running MMTTY and looking at the XY
scope is, why do I see the XY ovals shifting clockwise as the station
is transmitting. I find decoding is best when the ovals are as close
to straight vertical & horizontal. If I let them rotate, I lose the
cypher so I have to
se <dro...@necg.de>, elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 MHz external reference - GPSDO
Message-ID: <56e5663a.5080...@embarqmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
I think everyone is ignoring something here. What causes the frequency
dr
I think everyone is ignoring something here. What causes the frequency
drift in the first place?
It is temperature changes - the designation TCXO signifies Temperature
Compensated Xtal Oscillator. It is already compensated for temperature.
If the temperature of the TCXO stays the same, the
Frequency corrections can only be made in 1Hz steps (at 49.380MHz) and
because the higher-specification TCXO should drift more slowly, fewer
corrections should be required.
But this would only be relevant if someone is using an ultra-narrowband
digital mode that is sensitive to sudden small
Hi Oli,
I agree it looks like there is no point in paying for the TCXO-3 if you have a
reliable constantly available 10 MHz external reference. Perhaps they recommend
the better TCXO as a better fallback if for any reason the external ref is not
available, I can't think of any other reason for
what you have installed. Does
that clear it up?
73, Ed - KL7UW
The question to ask is what amount of frequency stability and accuracy
is important for your type of operations.
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:17:32 +0100
From: Oliver Dr?se <dro...@necg.de>
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject:
ortant for your type of operations.
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:17:32 +0100
From: Oliver Dr?se <dro...@necg.de>
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 MHz external reference - GPSDO
Message-ID: <56e3c28c.90...@necg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=f
Oliver, I was wondering about this, I guess it is just that the short term
drift is lower so it won't drift as much between frequency measurement
corrections which are made for 1 second every 4 seconds according to some info
recently published. I doubt it matters much though. I would be tempted
Why would I need the TCXO-3 instead of the TCXO-1 when using the K3EXREF
if the accuracy and stability is provided by the EXREF? Am I overlooking
something here?
Tnx & 73, Olli - DH8BQA
Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de
Am 11.03.2016 um 22:30 schrieb Edward R Cole:
First
battery which is float-charged from a good 12v PS.
73, Ed - KL7UW
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:25:54 -0500
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <li...@subich.com>
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 MHz external reference - GPSDO
Message-ID: <56e30db2.6080...@subich.com
Note that 2 Hz refers only to the reference oscillator which is close to
49,380 kHz. That is about .04 ppm, or about 10 times greater than the
specification for the high stability (optional) TCXO.
The frequency accuracy at HF will also be .04 ppm - at 10 MHz that is
0.4 Hz, at 20 MHzit is
I am not arguing about that calculation Joe, it's proof that you don't need
GPSDO accuracy as if will be several orders of magnitude better than that.
73 from David GM4JJJ
> On 11 Mar 2016, at 18:25, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>
>
> > While locked to the external source, the
AM
> To: Richard W. Solomon
> Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 MHz external reference - GPSDO
>
> Dick,
>
> I found the reference to that figure I quoted, it is in the K3EXREF manual:
>
> The K3EXREF option locks the K3's reference oscillat
Thank you David. That article is very good and answered a lot of
questions for me.
73
John AF6QO
On 3/11/2016 8:03 AM, David Anderson wrote:
You may want to have a look at this for some background on real world frequency
stability, and remember that the K3 isn't phase locked to the external
> While locked to the external source, the K3’s reference
> oscillator frequency is maintained within 2 Hz.
The K3's reference oscillator is 49.380 MHz (+/-) not 10 MHz.
The K3EXTREF uses the external 10 MHz signal to gate a counter
which counts the reference. That count is then used to
Dick,
I found the reference to that figure I quoted, it is in the K3EXREF manual:
The K3EXREF option locks the K3's reference oscillator frequency to an external
10 MHz source by automatically controlling the REF CAL function. While locked
to the external source, the K3’s reference oscillator
?
>
> 73, Dick, W1KSZ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David
> Anderson
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 9:04 AM
> To: g...@ka1j.com
> Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 M
Hi,
in case of such amount of bucks is planned to be spent for "ready to go"
unit then Leo Bodnar is the very good choice but I preffer this "Low Jitter
/ Low Phase Noise" model:
read ?
73, Dick, W1KSZ
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David
Anderson
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 9:04 AM
To: g...@ka1j.com
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 MHz external reference - GPSDO
You may want to h
You may want to have a look at this for some background on real world frequency
stability, and remember that the K3 isn't phase locked to the external
reference and is only going to be within 2Hz.
https://www.febo.com/pages/stability/
73 from David GM4JJJ
>
Hi Gary,
Because the K3 only -frequency- locks the frequency to within about 2Hz you
won't notice any difference between them. Similarly because the K3 TCXO isn't
-phase- locked to the external reference any phase noise on the reference won't
affect low phase noise of the synthesiser in the
I appreciate the replies to my question about sourcing a 10 MHz
external reference for my K3s. I didn't realize I needed more than
the K3EXREF to gain this accuracy and thanks to these replies, I now
better understand what will and what will not work. While I would
prefer to be able to buy a
27 matches
Mail list logo