: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 with 144Mhz transverter - phase noise
it would be quite interesting to know where is the culprit - if K2 or
the transverter
73 Martin OK1RR
Fraser Robertson napsal(a):
Adi, I've compared two latest spec. K2/100's with a FT1KMP, TS870
PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 with 144Mhz transverter
Hi Adi,
There must be something wrong with your K2 or measurement set up. As can
be seen
from the phase noise plot on our web page (under radio comparisons) the K2
TX
signal is better than -130 dBc when you get 10-20 kHz away from
Hi Adi,
When I take a look at
http://hft.fh-pforzheim.de/trxtest/Messergebnis/TRX_Messung_2_2005.xls
and not the PDF, I wonder which transverter was used with the K2. The
pictures http://hft.fh-pforzheim.de/trxtest/Photos_DK9IP/page_01.htm
would seem to indicate that the transverter was from
PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 2:04 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] K2 with 144Mhz transverter
Please some comments:
I had information that DK8SG measured some HF transcievers K2 included
with 2m transverter and got this data for K2:
NF 6dB, IP3 -26 dBm
Hi Adi,
There must be something wrong with your K2 or measurement set up. As can be seen
from the phase noise plot on our web page (under radio comparisons) the K2 TX
signal is better than -130 dBc when you get 10-20 kHz away from the carrier.
Also, what b/w and span were you using on your
, March 10, 2005 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 with 144Mhz transverter
Hi Adi,
There must be something wrong with your K2 or measurement set up. As can
be seen
from the phase noise plot on our web page (under radio comparisons) the K2
TX
signal is better than -130 dBc when you get 10-20 kHz
6 matches
Mail list logo
