[Elecraft] Receiver comparison K2 v FT1000mp

2006-03-08 Thread David Douglass
I've recently completed my second K2 and have been running some side by side trials with my FT1000mp. My first time around, the K2 was my only rig and having nothing to compare it against I had an element of self doubt that something I put together could perform as well as an off the shelf radio.

[Elecraft] Receiver comparison K2 v FT1000mp

2006-03-08 Thread Bill Tippett
VK2NU: It's hard to describe, but when comparing the 2 radios using 500hz filter settings, it almost sounded as if the filters on the K2 were much narrower. I belive the K2's filters are much narrower thanthe nominal indication. KI6WX measured around 350 Hz for both the 400 and 700

RE: [Elecraft] Receiver comparison

2006-01-19 Thread Don Wilhelm
Dale, You will not be disappointed in the K2 receiver - it is better than the K1. More selectivity control, greater sensitivity, greater dynamic range, and many other pluses. Both hear very well - in fact the test numbers place the K2 in a class with $3K transceivers. 73, Don W3FPR

[Elecraft] Receiver comparison

2006-01-18 Thread Dale Kretzer
As mentioned in my earlier posting today, I'm on the verge of taking the next step up the Elecraft ladder by purchasing a K2 kit. I have a question, however, that I know many of you are in a position to answer. I'm extremely impressed with the receiving characteristics of the K1, loving

[Elecraft] receiver comparison

2006-01-18 Thread MICHAEL DORE
Hi Dale. I have both the k1 k2+ssb fitted the k2 has a better rx than the k1 you have no worries if you enjoy the k1 you will love the k2 hope that helps Mick M1MGD K2#4785 K1#1532 G-qrp 11355Arci 12343 ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: