Reflector <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [Elecraft] What technical similarity do HRO receivers and Elecraft
receivers share that is unique? - Answer
Hi Don and others- Ok.Here is my answer- I don't think I am far off by
saying that the unique similarity it is in using switched comp
ity do HRO receivers and Elecraft
receivers share that is unique? - Answer
Hi Don and others- Ok.Here is my answer- I don't think I am far off by
saying that the unique similarity it is in using switched components to effect
frequency coverage of the same tuning coil. In the HRO they had clips you coul
Hi Don and others- Ok.Here is my answer- I don't think I am far off by
saying that the unique similarity it is in using switched components to effect
frequency coverage of the same tuning coil. In the HRO they had clips you could
change over to go to "bandspread" mode on each coil assembly,
The West Valley Amateur Radio Association (WVARA) Field Day
operation, using the K6EI call, has been using a mixture of
mostly K3s with some K2s and KX3s. We run QRP and last year
entered as 11AB. We have very little difficulty with mutual
interference, even when we are running SSB, digital,
ft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: 12/11/2015 6:23:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Receivers?
Scott,
I agree with all that Ron says -- and have the
K2, K3 and KX3 .. and like them all.
Re "I am considering the KX3": The one caveat I
would add, and others can expand on (or
disagree with) this,
Thanks Bill your description is really helpful. Thanks for taking the time to
send tha info along.
73
Scott
N0HOK / ZL1CHM
Auckland New Zealandx
Sent from my iPhone
On 12/12/2015, at 3:25 PM, Bill Frantz wrote:
> I have both a K3 and a KX3 and have used a K2. The
I don't think these descriptions are accurate, particularly the K2
versus K3 one.
The K2 is a fairly conventional, single conversion, analogue design. As
stated, it uses the crystal filter for primary selectivity. It
typically has up to two crystal filter options, one hard wired, and the
Hi,
the block diagram of the K2 can be found in the owners manual page 148.
http://www.elecraft.com/manual/E740001_K2%20Owner's%20Manual%20Rev%20I.pdf
73 de Hajo DL1SDZ
Gruss
Hajo
---
Cela est bien dit, mais il faut cultiver notre jardin.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:55 PM, David Woolley
I believe Ron had that at the tail end of his very
first reply, Brian.
Phil
On 12/12/15 7:21 AM, Brian Hunt wrote:
This has been an excellent discussion but I'm surprised there hasn't been a
reference to Rob Sherwood's chart which has a quantitative comparison of the
three receivers. Here
This has been an excellent discussion but I'm surprised there hasn't been a
reference to Rob Sherwood's chart which has a quantitative comparison of the
three receivers. Here it is: http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
73,
Brian, K0DTJ
-- Original Message --
From: "Phil Wheeler" <w...@socal.rr.com>
To: "Elecraft Reflector" <Elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: 12/12/2015 3:18:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Receivers?
Barry,
You said "Our Field Day operation uses all KX3s, QRP ... ".
In the K3 schematic, I don’t see any quadrature path starting from the second
mixer in the RX path — the two signals lines coming out of that 2nd RX mixer
are a balanced (differential) output, not in-phase and quadrature signals. On
the TX side, the DSP seems to produce I outputs, but it seems
Sorry guys, my bad. Comes from reading email on an iPod.
Brian, K0DTJ
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This
Matt,
You will not see analog I/Q signals in the K3 - the 2nd mixer's 15kHz
output feeds an Analog to Digital converter and the I and Q signals only
exist in the digital realm.
In transmit, the same thing happens in reverse - the mixer sees the 15
kHz output of a DAC.
73,
Don W3FPR
On
man.qth.net] On Behalf Of Scott
Gillen ZL1CHM
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 1:09 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Receivers?
Can anyone compare the receivers in the KX3 versus K3 versus K2? Is there a
significant difference? I am considering the KX3.
73
Scott
N0HOK /
Can anyone compare the receivers in the KX3 versus K3 versus K2? Is there a
significant difference? I am considering the KX3.
73
Scott
N0HOK / ZL1CHM
Auckland New Zealandx
Sent from my iPhone
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
--
From: "Phil Wheeler" <w...@socal.rr.com>
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: 12/11/2015 6:23:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Receivers?
Scott,
I agree with all that Ron says -- and have the K2, K3 and KX3 .. and
like them all.
Re "I am considering the KX3":
ering on their web site:
http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Scott
Gillen ZL1CHM
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 1:09 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Receivers?
Can anyone compare the recei
quot;Barry LaZar" <k3...@comcast.net>
Sent: 12/11/2015 7:10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Receivers?
Barry,
Re-read your note carefully. It doesn't make sense. You first say you
will not know he is there, then you say you will know he is there but
you can work through him? What does
I have both a K3 and a KX3 and have used a K2. The principle
reason I would consider buying a K2 is for the joy of assembling
the kit.
When I compare the KX3 and the K3, I think of the KX3 as being
about 90% of the K3, but many options are standard on the KX3
but extra cost on the K3. (Note
Regarding induced voltages, my K3's serial port and line audio ports were
damaged by induced voltages. The receiver was fine - the antennas had been
disconnected, but not the connecting cables. I now disconnect everything,
including the ground wire, during lightning storms and have had no
One dry, windy winter's day (with no lightning that I was aware of, so I assume
static build up) I had such a visitor come running down my antenna to meet my
K2. I had used the rig with no issues and then later in the day turned it on
and hit tune - that's when the smoke came out. In the end it
I can give my own first-hand, real-world take on this. Exactly a year ago, my
house took a direct hit with several shingles needing to be replaced. My one
only antenna (between roof sky) was vaporized, as was the feedline.
We lost a lot of electronic stuff to the strike as well as some
I have not heard of many incidents with diode damage with the K3, but
with the K2, we hear of this problem frequently. I do not know why the
K3 has escaped damage to the wattmeter diodes, since its power control
mechanism is similar to the K2. from W3FPR
Not quite. My early K3 developed
/question-about-Elecraft-receivers-tp6770258p6770258.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post
I believe you have been hearing about the wattmeter diodes in the KPA100.
That has nothing to do with the receiver at all. The receiver will
withstand quite an excessive surge.
The situation is that the K2/100 power control circuits depend on
measuring the transmitted power right at the
about something burning out due to close by
lightning.
I have not heard of this many before.
My question is because of the high sensitivity of the receivers are the
elecraft's prone to this?
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/question-about-Elecraft
On 9/7/2011 7:13 PM, KC6CNN wrote:
I have read several post about something burning out due to close by
lightning.
I have not heard of this many before.
My question is because of the high sensitivity of the receivers are the
elecraft's prone to this?
No. You hear about Elecraft lightning
There are some exceptions like communication towers where it is known
in advance that they will receive multiple hits over the years, and
need to be engineered to survive. And I can't even think about what
it must have been like in a fire lookout tower during a storm. I have
seen the
here is something I found on the net that will help others to understand better
the performance data tables:
Here a few measurements of receivers, using 500Hz filters.
MDS is a measure of sensitivity. -135dBm is 10dB more sensitive than -125dBm.
This number doesn't matter very much in
30 matches
Mail list logo