Please...if you are requesting help, don't insult me by
expecting me to jump through these idiotic processes
that say, in effect, that your time is more valuable
than mine.
I'm normally one who doesn't put up with a lot of crap. I just got a call
from a company asking me to make sure I've
Craig,
Sorry, but I beg to differ with you. If someone asks me for my help, I do
not expect to fill out any forms to provide that assistance - and I will
not.
There are many very good and effective spam filters out there - I use
Spambayes, and after a very short period of training, I have no
. :-)
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Mark Bayern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 9:29 AM
To: Craig Rairdin
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Simple-minded SPAM filters vs. list participation
When someone asks a question, they should be open
on our
end) there are much better solutions than the authentication spam programs.
73,
Rich
kd0zv
- Original Message -
From: Don Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 9:25 AM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Simple-minded SPAM filters vs. list
16, 2006 9:29 AM
To: Craig Rairdin
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Simple-minded SPAM filters vs. list
participation
When someone asks a question, they should be open to receiving the
answers.
There is something very wrong about asking a question and then in
effect
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:25 -0500, Don Wilhelm wrote:
Sorry, but I beg to differ with you. If someone asks me for my help, I do
not expect to fill out any forms to provide that assistance - and I will
not.
I agree completely. Those challenge emails are generally considered to
be poor
on FB and everyone will be happy.
73 Jack KZ5A
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Don Wilhelm
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 9:25 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Simple-minded SPAM filters vs. list
participation
Craig
Craig Rairdin wrote:
However, your logic in this post is self-defeating. By refusing to go
through the process of being whitelisted, you are saying, in effect, that
your time is more valuable than the person to whom you sent the email -- the
same accusation you make of him or her.
Bad
Craig Rairdin wrote:
It's truly bizarre to me to have people volunteer to join a list the purpose
of which is to help people do something they know about, then complain about
doing the very thing they voluntarily chose to do.
Well, I agree with those who think it is bizarre, as well as
The problem doesn't arise when only replying to the list.
The problem is that far too many list users don't bother to delete the
previous senders addresses in the REPLY TO list
and therefore send out several replies to each message.
Invariably, if someone replies to my post, I get the reply to
I wonder if I'm the only one who finds it aggravating to respond to a request
on this list, and get in return a message with a link I have to fill out for
the honor of passing the information to the requestee?
Please...if you are requesting help, don't insult me by expecting me to jump
through
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 15:29, Mike Morrow wrote:
Please...if you are requesting help, don't insult me by expecting me to jump
through these idiotic processes that say, in effect, that your time is more
valuable than mine.
Mike,
You have a 'Reply To' in your postings' headers that
Mike KK5F wrote:
I wonder if I'm the only one who finds it aggravating to respond to a
request on this list, and get in return a message with a link I have to fill
out for the honor of passing the information to the requestee?
Please...if you are requesting help, don't insult me by expecting me
13 matches
Mail list logo
