This, and others that may come along, could become a terrific booklet and a
standard of procedure for all of us.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 1:11 PM Fred wrote:
> That's worked for me twice in the last several years. First answer will
> be "What?" Just persist ... perhaps asking to speak to
That's worked for me twice in the last several years. First answer will
be "What?" Just persist ... perhaps asking to speak to someone who
knows what a Registered Agent for Service of Process is. We had a
problem in the ice maker of a new fridge, the warranty service company
kept sending
The bulk of consumer electronics, like wi-fi routers, is covered under Part
15, and it is therefore the responsibility of the operator of the Part 15
gear to deal with interference issues, NOT a neighborhood ham. Hams are not
responsible for interference to Part 15 gear. In fact, Part 15 gear has
On 10/20/2021 5:19 PM, Steve Stutman wrote:
Write a certified letter, return receipt requested, to the CEO or president
of the involved entity and cc: via the same method to head of your Public
Utilities Commission, or whatever you have in 6, as suggested by Ken.
Eric --
Before you do that,
Hi,
When needing to get a result from anything publicly regulated, consider
using something other than the interwebs or 800 number.
K6MR points in the right direction.
Specifically:
Write a certified letter, return receipt requested, to the CEO or president
of the involved entity and cc: via
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gary Smith
> Sent: 01 November 2019 19:56
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Elecraft] Suggestion for the K4
>
> Something I'd mentioned earlier that would
> be good for the K3 will also apply on the
> K4 as well
...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gary Smith
Sent: 01 November 2019 19:56
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Suggestion for the K4
Something I'd mentioned earlier that would
be good for the K3 will also apply on the
K4 as well: Operating permissions per
band. Perhaps an option for license
Something I'd mentioned earlier that would
be good for the K3 will also apply on the
K4 as well: Operating permissions per
band. Perhaps an option for license class
operating permissions. Select to engage
the option for General and you will always
be 100% operating properly as a General.
An
Ok.. this is brief, and to the point.
There is, and has been a whole LOT of trouble shooting wisdom shared on this
reflector.
I'm not picking out any one person, but Don would be a great start, add in
others too,
with a publication of all that is offered by Don, on a product. Then one would
Dale,
Thank you for that vote of confidence. I have made several attempts to
create a book of K2 (K1 or KX1) troubleshooting that is more than what
is in the Elecraft manuals. I have failed due to the specifics of the
possible failures. I can relate a solution to a specific set of
My K3 (#3873) has better transmit and receive audio than my Mark V, which I
thought was awesome. (Except the Mark V had a MUCH better internal speaker).
One disadvantage I have found with My K3 transmit audio is that you must choose
between 2.7kHz or lower bandwidth or 3.3kHz bandwidth or
Dean44 wrote:
when the ESSB mode is engaged, you can turn the menu bandwidth down to
3.0kHz but it is really about 3.3kHz wide on the transmitted signal. This
has been my experience on my K3 and watching other K3s on the air in the
band scope.
Actually, I measure 3.0Khz transmitted
Elecrew: As you roll out new products in the K3 line (P3, amp, etc.), is
there any chance you'll offer a bare matching enclosure for sale separately,
as you do with the K1 and K2 product lines?
It could be the perfect size for a homebrewed matching power supply and/or
speaker, etc.
--Andrew
NV1B
I would echo Andrew's request. Althought I know you have said there is
adequate room in the P3 enclosure for a homebrewed power supply, I have
several things I would like to build into an enclosure matching the K3. I
would buy one (or two) today
73.
Don, WB5HAK
I know you have said there is adequate room in the P3 enclosure for a
homebrewed power supply
Something the supply inside P3 wouldn't accommodate is a forward-facing
speaker (in my case, the top-mounted speaker will be covered by a low shelf)
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Don Cunningham
I now have the spring fever for building...Thinking of putting the
KPA100 together for my K2.
Any suggestion for a suitable (cheap!) power supply?
--
Yves Dussault-VE2ATD
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
, February 14, 2009 11:54 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Suggestion for power supply
I now have the spring fever for building...Thinking of putting the
KPA100 together for my K2.
Any suggestion for a suitable (cheap!) power supply?
--
Yves Dussault-VE2ATD
If you know what caused the problem, it's fairly simple to undo
anything in
the K3 (e.g. tapping METER while in CONFIG gives you the default
setting for
most parameters). I believe the question was how to recover if you get
yourself into an unknown state and don't know how you got there.
Good point. The Utility will let you snap a baseline of your rig
settings, today.
What may be easier to use also is, upon finalizing your settings on the
K3, you snap the baseline of the config via the Utility.
Time passes and you screw up your K3 config.. you get it out of wack and
want to
Adam Koczarski wrote:
Virtually every software application has an undo key. Backups are for
major
restores, not for a mistaken edit. When's the last time you used a backup
to
restore a document you mistakenly delete a word from?? Not quite the same
thing.
Adam - ka7ark
If
Adam Koczarski wrote:
Virtually every software application has an undo key. Backups are for major
restores, not for a mistaken edit. When's the last time you used a backup to
restore a document you mistakenly delete a word from?? Not quite the same
thing.
Adam - ka7ark
Every day.
...Ah the [UNDO] button. Such a simple elegant idea. Where it is
available I use it without any thinking, and with great relief.
Some developers of software for the MACINTOSH, where the 'undo' feature
is explicitly defined and encouraged, say that fully 50% of total
development effort
Richard Davis-5 wrote:
...Ah the [UNDO] button. Such a simple elegant idea. Where it is
available I use it without any thinking, and with great relief.
There is an UNDO button of sorts. It's called Restore K3 Configuration
From... in the K3 Utility Configuration Menu. This
Bill W4ZV wrote:
There is an UNDO button of sorts. It's called Restore K3 Configuration
From... in the K3 Utility Configuration Menu. This presumes you stored
the default configuration and/or changes you've made. Of course, if you
try this, you'll see it's not instantaneous by any
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-
boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Julian, G4ILO
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 3:26 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Suggestion
And all computers have an undo function
Hi Eric and Wayne,
Since you asked, may I suggest something which may be silly.
We all know the VFO B knob changes the menu items and the main tuning knob
does the changing within the menu. I make the mistake all the time getting
them reversed.. my problem which I can live with, but wonder if
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-
boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Lynn Lamb, W4NL
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 1:25 PM
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: [Elecraft] Suggestion
We all know the VFO B knob changes the menu items
Hi Lynn,
It helps to think of it in this way:
- the large knob on the left controls what's on the large display
that's shifted to the left
- the small knob on the right controls what's on the small display
that's shifted the right
To change it now would cause a huge amount of turmoil,
: [Elecraft] Suggestion
Hi Lynn,
It helps to think of it in this way:
- the large knob on the left controls what's on the large display
that's shifted to the left
- the small knob on the right controls what's on the small display
that's shifted the right
To change it now would cause a huge amount
On the Elecraft reflector, you wrote:
Can you make the TX symbol bigger when we take the radio off air to test
the audio? When the TX is blinking fast it's hard to see and I have to
look twice to see if I am not transmitting.
Unfortunately, this can not be done. The display is not changeable
An alternate method may be to make the blink longer on than off and give
more chance to read it.
73, Jim KG0KP
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Beford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 10:26 AM
Subject: [Elecraft
TX is blinking hard to see
Unfortunately, this can not be done. The display...Don't expect this to
happen.
IF elecraft decided it is a real issue.. they COULD make the
FREQUENCY OR all of the elements flashing on off to remind us
that IT AIN'T GONNA XMIT YOU TURNED IT
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Beford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 10:26 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] Suggestion To Elecraft
On the Elecraft reflector, you wrote:
Can you make the TX symbol bigger when we take the radio
Bruce Beford wrote:
On the Elecraft reflector, you wrote:
Can you make the TX symbol bigger when we take the radio off air to
test
the audio? When the TX is blinking fast it's hard to see and I have to
look twice to see if I am not transmitting.
Look at the power meter. It won't
Can you make the TX symbol bigger when we take the radio off air to test
the audio? When the TX is blinking fast it's hard to see and I have to
look twice to see if I am not transmitting.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Suggestion-To-Elecraft-tp1475544p1475544.html
Sent
Here's another suggestion for the K3.
When using Spot on CW, the tuning appears to switch automatically to fine
from coarse mode. That makes sense, at least temporarily.
But then it stays in fine mode, even if one started in coarse mode.
It would be better, I think, if it switched back
Les:
Here's another suggestion for the K3.
When using Spot on CW, the tuning appears to switch automatically to fine
from coarse mode. That makes sense, at least temporarily.
But then it stays in fine mode, even if one started in coarse mode.
It would be better, I think, if it switched back
If I may dare to make a suggestion. There are going to be a LOT of questions.
May I suggest a 'K3 FAQ on the web page with the most Frequently Asked
(hence, FAQ ;-) on it? Save answering the same one here several times.
--
---
_____
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ John L. Sielke
This is in the works. Stay tuned.
Wayne
On Apr 28, 2007, at 10:29 AM, W2AGN wrote:
If I may dare to make a suggestion. There are going to be a LOT of
questions. May I suggest a 'K3 FAQ on the web page with the most
Frequently Asked (hence, FAQ ;-) on it? Save answering the same one
here
What I would _really_ love to build or buy from elecraft would be some
sort of bandscope for K2 ... my life would be complete if this were to
come to pass!
Joseph J. Sanger, M.D.
Associate Professor of Radiology
Director, Radiology Informatics
Director, Database Application Development, SoM
Joseph,
You may want to check out the N4PY software http://www.ralabs.com/n4py/. It
does include a bandscan if you activate it. Much less expensive than a
hardware bandscaning device.
73,
Don W3FPR
-Original Message-
What I would _really_ love to build or buy from elecraft would be
41 matches
Mail list logo
